Rotten Apple Theory Of Police Corruption

There are four principle theories for the clarification of police corruption; the rotten apple theory, the deviant subculture theory, the opportunity theory and the social structure theory. The rotten apple theory expresses that rotten apples are powerless people who have snuck past the screening methodology or deviant people who proceed with their abnormality in a domain that issues them more opportunity. The premise of the rotten apple theory is a couple ethically week singular's vicinity adulterates others. The rotten apple theory is most prominent with police officers and directors on the grounds that it accuses the entire issue for one very deceptive individual, thus a rotten one. The rotten apple theory minimizes the general population's

Police officers make a police subculture, where they can identify with one another, being police officers. The premise of the deviant subculture is that the police subculture itself causes corruption. The opportunity theory is in view of the thought that police work by and large, causes corruption. Police work is unsupervised. A police officer can seize liquor or medications from adolescents and not capture them and not compose a report but rather keep the seized things for himself/herself. Not just are police seizing liquor and medications, police likewise seize cash from medications. The opportunity theory best clarifies police corruption in light of the fact that officers are unsupervised with medications, liquor, and cash every day of their employment. Social learning theory, control balance theory, opportunity theory, deterrence theory, theories on self-control, organizational theories, the life course perspective, and developmental approaches have all been used and tested to explain misconduct and corruption (White & Kane, 2013, pp.