Roman and Spartan Warriors

1280 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: ancient greek and roman military

Introduction
Ancient Greece, Sparta especially, and Ancient Rome were best known for their military tactics and strategies. In the Greek city-state Sparta, military went as far as making every male citizen a hoplite, warriors of Ancient Greece, and go through a mandatory training program, agoge, or put through public humiliation (Park and Love). It is impossible to say that both Rome and Sparta neglected the idea of implementing warfare into their daily lives.
Ancient Sparta was the head of the Greek military, at one point the only Greek military. Genius tactics at the time led Sparta to become famous throughout the Mediterranean region as the strongest military force. The hoplites were known for their round shield and carried long spears with short swords (Sidebottom). During times of war, a military formation known as the phalanx, in which was essentially warriors standing in a box formation supporting one another, was used to essentially “push” the other side, striking down the other side by either being trampled or stabbed by the short swords of the opposing side. This basic formation was the very heart and soul of Greek warfare.
Rome, on the other hand, was improving upon their military as well. Rome’s military was not as original, as they used the same formation of the phalanx at one point in time and even modified tactics used by their enemies; eventually though, Rome developed new tactics and different fighters, including cavalry or alae (Watson). The Roman military system was basically tripartite, or in a three-part system with each part focused on a specific area or spread out amongst the empire (Watson). This military system helped lead Rome to eventually become the largest empire the world had not previ...

... middle of paper ...

...nt Warfare: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, GBR. Ebook. 21 Nov. 2013
Rice, Rob S. Ancient Roman Warfare. Gareth Stevens, 2009. Web. 11 May. 2014
Sidebottom, Harry. Ancient Warfare: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, GBR. Ebook. 21 Nov. 2013
Sidnell, Phillib. Warhorse: Cavalry in Ancient Warfare. London: Hambledon Continuum, Ebook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 10 Dec. 2013
Tucci, Jim. “Warfare in the Ancient World” The Journal of Military History. 74.3 (2010): 879-99. Proquest. Web. 22 Nov. 2013
Warnock, Michael T., Jr. “The American Hoplite: Evolution of the Infrantryman” Infantry 97.6 (2008): 43-6. Proquest. Web. 22 Nov. 2013
Watson, George Ronald. The Roman Soldier. Cornell University Press, 1985. Web. 1 Apr. 2014
W.G. Runciman. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Vol. 4. No. 4 (Dec. 1998) p. 731-751 Great Britain and Ireland. 3 Nov. 2013

Show More
Related

  • Augustus Military Power Essay

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    During his reign, Augustus made a number of changes how the Roman military operated. As Rome shifted from a Republic to Empire and the ideas of what Rome was to be was carefully being crafted by Augustus to fit his own narrative, the army went through a number of changes to support the new dynamic of Empire and Emperor. These changes to the army allowed the army to grow to fit its new role, and helped Rome to become a true military power.

    Read More

  • Methods of Political Control for the Roman and Gupta/Mauryan Empires

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since the beginning, Rome had been a military state it was central to its life and they had excelled in the technique of organization and technology. Since the Romans had established a formal language they were able to communicate with one another. The Romans had conquered anything that they had seen weakness in and this had eventually made their Empire as large as 60 million people. Their strategy for milita...

    Read More

  • Roman Military Case Study

    818 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the video BC Battles: Caesar Super Siege the Roman military was so successful because they were a nearly professional, very large army consisting of more than 50,000 soldiers, between 10 legions. The Roman military used their technological advances to forge innovative armor and weapons, such as the gladius, a small stabbing sword. They had siege weapons, ballistae, which fires a lead shot, and used catapults to pummel the enemy from afar. They created obstacles for their enemies like sharpened sticks that acted as barbed wire on their walls. They utilized booby traps, such as wooden spikes, and placed them at the bottom of the trenches. They had cavalry, mounted troops, which was very effective against ground soldiers. In the battle of Alesia, Caesar decided to build a 12-foot wall around the

    Read More

  • Sparta: Infrastructure, Social Structure, and Superstructure

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Spartan culture is a great example of how a society’s infrastructure will directly affect both, its social structure and superstructure. It also serves as a warning that any society that becomes too rigid in its structure and too static in its values will not last long when confronted with more agile and adaptable cultures. This paper will explore why Sparta became the Hellenic army par excellence, how this worked to create a very specific social structure founded on martial values, and, finally, how that social structure would ultimately be the undoing of the culture.

    Read More

  • The Spartan Economy

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unlike the Spartan Agrarian based, exclusive economy, the Athenians practiced vast and complex external trade. This is reflected in the very make-up of the Athenian and Spartan militaries. Sparta was a primarily land based military with focus lying on Hoplite formations of infantry, whereas Athens had an extensive naval tradition in their military affairs. Attica had a considerable coastline on the south and east

    Read More

  • Gladiator and the Roman Army

    361 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Roman Army was a masterpiece in itself. There was no other army like it, and was impenentrable. This was probably because of the extreme patriotism and pride in battling for Rome, and maintaining their superiority. Gladiator, "RomanArmy.com", and The History of the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire all portray this patriotism in many aspects.

    Read More

  • The Battle of Marathon

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...rated the superiority of the Greek long spear and armor over the weapons of the Persians, as well as the superior tactics of Miltiades and the military training of the Greek hoplites. The choice of weapons, training of warriors, selection of battle site, and timing had all worked together to help the Athenians prove that size doesn’t always matter.

    Read More

  • The Roman Empire and Risk

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simkin, John. “ Military Tactics of the Roman Army.” spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk. Spartacus Educational, Sept. 1997- June 2013. Web. 9 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • The Roman Military

    463 Words  | 1 Pages

    The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.

    Read More

  • Success of the Roman Army

    1634 Words  | 4 Pages

    During their time, the strategy the Roman’s employed was second to none. The success of their strategy started with the Roman’s separating their armies into smaller, more specific types. They used many different types of infantry throughout the years, but the main types they used were the velites, hastati, principes, triarii, and later the famous Legionaries were introduced (Roman Empire Wars). These infantry worked together on the battlefield to effectively eliminate the enemy and win the battle.

    Read More

  • Sparta: The Elite Military Power of Ancient Greece

    2282 Words  | 5 Pages

    In ancient Greece during the 7th and 8th centuries, different armies and cities were fighting for control of land and power. During this time period, it was very gruesome and many people died because different states wanted to expand their control over new territories so they could gain more power. With all the different armies and militaries fighting for control, there was one that stood out as the elite of all militaries, Sparta. Quickly Sparta became known throughout Greece as the most highly disciplined and coordinated militaries in the world.

    Read More

  • Aspects of Spartan Culture

    1595 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sparta, an ancient Greek city-state, was most well-known for its militaristic lifestyle and its soldiers’ prowess in battle. Though war was an essential part of life in Sparta, many other aspects contributed to its society. Sparta’s origin, unique government, slaves, bold women, and elite warriors all shaped the legendary city-state and defined its culture.

    Read More

  • Rise of the Roman Republic

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many political, economic, sociological causes to the growth and expansion of the Roman republic and later the Roman Empire, but one major factor of expansion that the Romans are most famous for is there Army. There Army was famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and there mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. According to our text Roman warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the Roman pursuit of victory was relentless. The Romans had a pragmatic view towards atrocity and massacre that viewed almost any act as justifiable if it eased the path of victory (Goldsworthy 2000) p. 24. The hoplite phalanx which originated by the Greeks and later adopted by the Roman army, demanded great discipline and adherence to orders in order for this group of soldiers...

    Read More

  • Acquisitive Vs. Satisfied Powers

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both had strong tactics and soldiers. However, Roman troops and tactics were far superior to the Greeks.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Greek and Roman Warfare

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    The main difference between Greek and Roman warfare was the formations that they fought in. The Grecian armies all used the phalanx as a fighting formation while the Romans used the maniple. The phalanx was one mass formation that consisted of infantry eight deep. The maniple formation was actually a group of formations in a checkerboard pattern. Each maniple consisted of about 120 men and when employed in Italy, the Romans used thirty maniples. The maniple proved to be a better formation, because the phalanx left no room for maneuvering after engagement.

    Read More

More about Roman and Spartan Warriors

Open Document