Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison essays
Compare and contrast essays
Comparison essays example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Committee of Public Safety’s main goal was to “Protect” the country from its outside enemies; yet the C.P.S had no idea if there were any real enemies within the country. Maximilian Robespierre, as leader of the committee of public safety in a way too much control in hands in a bad very bad way. If Robespierre would’ve not use too much terror among the people of France… the people would not have been stealing, killing, hoarding, and/or monopolizing. On another hand, the committee of public safety passed good laws to help the people and to help protect outside forces from attacking or intruding. Although, the fact that the leading of Robespierre was in bad condition as an almost “ Dictator “ as well did Not Protect the Revolution from
In this essay I shall try to find whether the Terror was inherent from the French revolutions outset or was it the product of exceptional circumstances. The French revolution is the dividing line between the Ancien Regime and the modern world. After France the hierarchy that societies of the time had been founded on began to change and they began to sweep away the intricate political structures of absolute monarchy, but however to achieve this was the Terror absolutely necessary? And was it planned/ or was it just the extraordinary circumstances, which the French had lead themselves into once they had deposed of Louis the sixteenth. Whatever way it is looked at, the political ideology of the rest of the world was going to change after the French revolution. The conflicting ideology's of the French revolution from socialism to nationalism would now be mainstream words and spearhead many political parties in years to come. The French revolution had been in high hopes that a peaceful transition could be made from absolutist to parliamentary monarchy, but what went wrong? Surely the terror could not have been in their minds at this time? Surely it was not inherent from the start.
First, the Jacobin leader Robespierre’s tried to protect the revolution but this plan backfired. It backfired because immediately after the publication of this decree, all suspected persons within the territory
Toussaint L’Ouverture was born in 1743 in Saint Domingue on a plantation in Cap-Haïtien. He was quite prodigious as a young child: rather than working as a field slave and toiling in the hot sun, he began his slave existence as a herder. Later on, he became a coach driver and waiter for his owner. Ultimately, his owner saw such promise in him that he appointed L’Ouverture as an overseer of fellow slaves who were working in the field. Throughout his tenure, being a more “upscale” slave, he was given access to the plantation library. It was in that library that L’Ouverture’s godfather taught him how to read and write, and the seeds of his future were sown.
The goal of the Committee of the Public Safety was to protect the revolution from its enemies because they didn't want people to invade so they wouldn't be attacked. But, over time many things changed due to the Committee of Public Safety. For instance, they considered monopoly a series crime because the profiter inherited of selling items daily, and they wouldn't hoard it which means to keep for themselves. Also, The Committee of Public Safety passed the Decree Against Profiteers because the profiteers were ripping the people off by raising the price and the profiteers wanted to make everything to themselves.
During the summer of 1793, the radical phase of the French Revolution was intensified by the Terror, created by The Committee of Public Safety. The Terror successfully preserved the Revolution by weeding out counter-revolutionaries to eliminate corruption within the government and giving equality to all social classes which untied France under one government. However, these successes were undermined by the many failures of the Terror due to the oppression of citizens which would lead to many executions and the paranoid slaughtering of citizens from all social classes which led to the changes in support of the Revolution.
“Europe cannot conceive of life without Kings and nobles; and we cannot conceive of it with them. Europe is lavishing her blood to preserve her chains, whereas we are lavishing ours to destroy them”(Maximilien Robespierre). For centuries upon centuries, the monarchal system had dominated European life. The very nature of this method of rule incited rebellious feelings, as a definite imbalance of power was present. Understandably, people under this system had risen against authority. The glorious nation of France was no exception. The eighteenth century brought about a great deal of economic and social turmoil. By the end of this one hundred year period, rebellion had been talked about by many citizens for quite some time. However, no definitive action was taken until one man stepped to the forefront; Maximilien Robespierre. Born in Arras, France about thirty years prior to the French Revolution, Robespierre was an immensely intelligent man as is seen from his ability to read and write fluently from the age of eight (the Force of 10). Robespierre rose from fairly humble origins to become a provincial lawyer, advancing further to become a representative in the Estates General, and eventually ascending to the leader of the French Revolution itself. For its sake he sent thousands to the guillotine, overthrew a monarchy, declared a new national religion, and invigorated the will of a nation. “No individual of the French Revolutionary era, with the exception of Napolean Bonaparte, has excited more passion in his time than the…dedicated provincial lawyer, Maximilien Robespierre”(Maximilien 1). During this era, Robespierre led France’s world inspiring cry for the liberation of mankind and petrified the world with its relentle...
Although protecting their people from enemies was their goal, they did not do it very effectively. Robespierre became the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, but he was more like a dictator. During his time of ruling the French it became known as the reign of terror. To “protect” the French Revolution against its enemies they guillotined about 40,000 people. Some that they killed weren’t even committing serious crimes, not serious enough to die anyways. One18 year old girl was killed for cutting down a tree that represented liberty. The ideals of the French revolution were life,liberty, and property, but Robespierre wasn’t honoring that like he
Napoleon's military strength and commanding authority led to numerous victories in battles, such as Napoleon's success with defending the National Convention on October 5, 1795 against the royalists. The French people needed his strong leadership because the French Revolution and Maximilien Robespierre's Reign of Terror made France extremely unstable. In addition to Napoleon's wise military strategies, he had his charismatic speeches. He could rally France and instill courage and nationalism into his soldiers so they fought harder. Napoleon made the French people want to do their parts in civilization so that they could make France the superior power in Europe. Despite Napoleon's reputation on the battlefield, he had a soft spot for his wife, Josephine. He wrote love letters and he later proposed in January 1796. He truly loved her, but Josephine could not bear children because of her age and Napoleon needed an heir to continue his legacy. Napoleon later divorced Josephine and married Marie-Louise of Austria in 1809. Most prominent of Napoleon's attributes is his ambition and persistence. He still held onto his dream of ruling over a united Europe even after the European powers exiled him to Elba on April 11, 1814. He escaped and returned to France, and Napoleon once again ruled which is
I would argue that Napoleon is a tyrant and not a hero because of the way the ruled France. Napoleon is responsible for the deaths of countless amounts of people through wars and battles that he put France through. Wars and battles such as the Battle of Waterloo, the Battle of Austerlitz and the Battle of Borodino had a big impact on France's population and the economy. Speaking about battles, even though people can argue that he was a fantastic military leader, he wasn't very great when he fled and abandoned his fellow troops in Egypt and Russia. Not only is Napoleon responsible for the deaths of hundreds of troops and for fleeing a war because things got too bad, he is also to blame for pushing France into a deeper bankruptcy. He agreed to
In his book Twelve Who Ruled, Palmer eloquently writes this narrative, "weaving the biographies of the twelve into the history of their time," and provides a coherent and convincing explanation of the terror. The book is not only educational for someone interested in the time period when these twelve men ruled the nation of France, but it is also enjoyable from the perspective of a person reading the book solely for interest in revolutions and how they affect the people who are involved in them. The book deals with a brief period of time during the French Revolution, namely the year of terror. The book ventures to interpret the foundations and rationale for the terror and Palmer illustrates his speculations on the subject through gracious, flowing writing.
Napoleon Bonaparte: Hero or Tyrant? The Napoleonic Era and the French Revolution were times of fast social and political transforms and France situated in the centre of the way of incidents in Europe. The French mutiny and the consequent time of Napoleonic conflicts transported about philosophical transforms that produced new Europe. The French mutiny divided the church from the state and stopped human rights of the dignified class and in 1793 the French Republic was recognized. These transforms essentially forced response from older European kingdom that was mainly scared of innovative thoughts would being “exported” from France.
He favored giving the vote to all men, not just property owners, and he also opposed slavery. Robespierre was popular at meetings in a Paris club called the Jacobins, whose members admired him and referred to him as "the Incorruptible" because of his honesty and firm sense of right and wrong. Later in life, in July 1973 Robespierre was elected to the Committee of Public Safety, which acted to protect the republic during the dual problems of foreign war, which later became known as the Reign of Terror. Robespierre and his supporters claimed that they wanted to create a Republic of Virtue in which citizens would live honest, moral lives and serve the
The main question this essay sets out to answer is whether the Terror was a necessary, justifiable stage in ensuring success for the Revolution, or was it a brutal Jacobin policy put in place for the ruling faction to keep power? This essay argues that while violence and terror are by no means a positive, Maximilien Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety’s actions were justified. In this paper I critically discuss how Robespierre has been misrepresented by a number of historians, and although he did engage in Terror during the French Revolution, he was not a “bloodthirsty tyrant” as many historians have made him out to be. His actions were constantly underpinned by Enlightenment ideals such as virtue and liberty and he believed he was
“There were two main groups that contributed to government during the Reign of Terror. One was the committee of Public Safety. They were established to ensure the progress of the revolution. It consisted of twelve members including "Bertrand Barère de Vieuzac, Lazare Carnot, Georges Couthon, M. J. Hérault de Séchelles, Maximilian Robespierre, and Louis de Saint-Just and the Hébertists, J. N. Billaud-Varenne and J. N. Collot d’Herbois". They established order by preventing and eliminating anti-revolutionary activity. They began the terror due to the necessity of public participation in their precautionary measures.” (www.public.gettysburg.edu). The main goal of the committee was to handle what was going on during the war and report it to the National Convention. Although the Committee of Public Safety barely had power, if the committee made any rules or changes it would have to go through the convention first. Some decisions that the committee made was not shown to the convention and therefore it was secretly accepted.
In many senses, the French Revolution, created a whole new belief system (Gamble, 1981). Those at the forefront of the revolution set out to develop a system of checks and balances that would promote liberty, control royal power, abolish privilege and achieve this within the confines of the law – enshrined within