Life course theory in my opinion, displays a better explanation on women’s criminality and their reasoning behind their offenses. Drawing from the structure of social theory by Gottfredson and Hirschi’s, Laub’s formed this theory, which speculates life events in one’s life. Not only does life course theory look at the importance of what initiate these women criminal behaviors but it also explore existences patterns that may have caused a change. Following this theory, life course is an interview process that interviews incarcerated women at the adolescent stage and then interviewed again in their adulthood stage. Peggy, Giordano, Deines, and Cernkovich main focus in respect to women offending, is to get a better study of female to date.
The defendant is a woman. In our era of equal rights and civil liberties women have made great strides in their advancement and role in society, yet it seems that gender segregates when it comes to crime. There have been countless cases where women and men have been tried for the same crime, yet when it comes to verdict and sentencing, the results don’t necessarily match. If one commits a crime one should be punished accordingly regardless of gender. In our society we seem to have two separate rules for our criminals, one for men and one for women.
This is excellently shown in books written by Freda Adler and Rita Simon as they generally state that once female emancipation became a large part of society, it allowed for women to create many opportunities for themselves that made them just as likely to be subject to crime as men. It was also predicted that men and women would ultimately be treated equally within the criminal justice system based on this fact. However history shows that men and women commit different crimes allowing for them to receive different punishments in regards to those crimes. Often when a man commits theft he is seen as greedy; however, when a women commits theft she is seen as needy. This allows sentencing to follow many different variables based on the interpretation of the crime and the criminal.
Even though these women were or had been working women in a least salary occupation, and expected numerous inordinate lengths of time as an underprivileged woman, they fought to make dissertations about financial requirement that would be suitable for the involvement they had in crimes. From the interviews and youth justice specialists’ views about the reasons of young women’s criminal, several subjects were acknowledged as existence of unlimited significance and having a permanent effect on females who commit crimes. The subjects were based on: family backgrounds, peer and local relationship among personal dysfunction and childhood criminal actions, parenting was thought to also have a great part in the process of a set mind of whether to convert to crime or not, stressed family associations and family failure were commonly handled as to have correspondingly undesirable concerns for young people of mutually genders. An important different issue to be considered is low self-confidence which is a threat for female youth criminals, mainly in the situation of alcohol ingestion. These participants deprived of the idea that erotic persecution has any
It gives an insight on a woman’s thoughts and feelings on why the crimes were committed in the first place. The reason I say this topic is intense because as I was reading books and articles and watching documentaries, I came across some very interesting facts and stories on why women do these types of things. There are many facts for what causes women to commit a crime and what happens to them once they are incarcerated. In some cases when women are incarcerated they want to transform their lives around for the better, and sometimes they don’t. Many people judge women and believe that they are the most precious people on earth because they’re so feminine, but honestly women can be found guilty as well.
Gender violence is a huge predicament in today 's society. In part, the subordination of women is a long lasting legacy that colonialism has left in the America’s. The book Violence Against Latina Immigrants by Roberta Villalon is closely linked to my practical experience at the Woman 's Building because we both have been able to witness first hand while volunteering at nonprofit organizations the vulnerability that women, especially undocumented women, have with abuse. Villalon worked in a non profit organization that offered free legal assistance to undocumented immigrants who had been victims of abuse. It was through this experience that she learns about the constant obstacles that victims of abuse face primarily due to their legal standing
Labeling is very important when discussing female criminality because women incarcerated for drug offenses are not major players but maintain a very minimal role in process. Most women are innocent by standers to their intimate partners who actually deserves to be labeled and punished. Thus, women should not have the same labels as men. Also labeling mechanisms also effect a woman’s reentry into society. Since women are usually the bread winners for their homes, it is vital that the crimes that they commit are adequately given names that support their role in a criminal act.
In an article about The Criminal Justice System and Woman both Freda Alder and Rita Simons talk about theories and facts about the woman committing crimes that we see on TV’s, newspapers, and interviews. They discuss in depth about the reasoning on why woman are now starting to do crimes and murders as bad as men have done over the past years. Women have gained self-esteem, confidence, and self-sufficiency. Reason this has happened is because now women work and back then most women would be stay at home wives now many more women work and have built confidence that they won’t be controlled by their husbands. The female rate has increased throughout the years as well as the growth in the type of violent crimes committed.
By keeping them “caged” it is easier to control the woman 's behavior, morality, beliefs and roles within their lives. Later on in the article it begins to talk about the Indians new economy and the females slowly growing more independance. Women begin to confront the issues by protesting and creating campaigns. Lastly, the author Srila Roy relates India female issues in the past that are similar to the matters that occur now. I was interested in this article because female violence and danger occurs across the world just as it does in the United States.
This attitude resulted in the use of privately led rehabilitation programs for women as opposed to the strictly controlled environments encouraged for male offenders. While use of rehabilitative efforts might make it appear that female offenders have a more hopeful future in comparison to male offenders, McCorkel intends to prove that these privately run programs perpetuate a control over women by "breaking them down." McCorkel identifies this process as the feminine version of the "get tough" crusade. The author explains her theory through the examination of influential decisions made by state actors, the prison resource crisis, and psychical dilemmas within prisons. A careful evaluation of damaging "habilitative" control strategies and the consequences of this new correction method exposes a mechanism that continues the insubordination of women.