Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Adoption narrative essay setup
An essay on character development
An essay on character development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Adoption narrative essay setup
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is a children’s book written by Rudyard Kipling, about a mongoose that was adopted into by an English family in India. The story begins with a little boy, Teddy, finding a mongoose washed up after a flood. The mongoose was friendly and would protect the house from venomous snakes; they named him Rikki-Tikki-Tavi because it is onomatopoeia for the sound that Rikki makes.
The story explains that mongooses are curious, so Rikki spent his time exploring everything in the house. When exploring outside, Rikki meets a bird that explains to him that one of his babies fell out of the nest and was eaten by Nag, the cobra. That night, Rikki overhears the cobras’ plans to kill the family, so that Rikki would leave and they could take over the garden. Nag sleeps in the bathroom overnight, planning to kill Teddy’s dad in the morning; Rikki attacks him, causing the father to wake up and shoot Nag, saving the family. Rikki also helps save the family by distracting Nag’s widow, Nagaina, as she was about to attack, eventually killing her as well. The family was very thankful, as he had saved all of their lives.
The story is written in a moralistic tone. After defeating the first snake, Karait, he could indulge and eat his kill or all the food offered that night as a reward, but he instead ate a light dinner because he knew there were more cobras to fight so he didn’t want to be slowed down. “That bite paralyzed Karait, and Rikki-tikki was just going to eat him up from the tail to the head, after the custom of his family, when he remembered that a big meal makes a slow mongoose” (Kippling 16). The tone of that passage suggests that this anti-gluttony attitude is one the reader should also take up when necessary. Many asp...
... middle of paper ...
...d use Rikki as a weapon to control snakes. “‘Teddy is safer with that little animal in his room than with a watchdog. If a snake came into his room-’ But Teddy’s mother wouldn’t think of anything so awful” (Kipling 5). In addition to keeping Rikki as a pet and companion for his son, he sees how it may benefit and protect his family. Teddy’s father sees Karait as a threat to Teddy so he beats the snake with a stick, and shoots Nag when he hears him fighting with Rikki. Instead of trying to rearrange the garden so the snakes can’t hide in the tall grass, he just uses his human power to remove the threat permanently.
This book could be seen as a reversal of the Garden of Eden allegory. Teddy is an innocent boy in a garden, threated by a snake. Instead of getting kicked out of the garden, the snake is defeated, his innocence is preserved, and he remains in the garden.
The idea that man's relationship with good and evil is not predestined is a central idea in this novel. The conflict between good and evil is a universal battle. Many characters in the novel, East of Eden, struggle both internally and externally with Good versus evil.
Rikki-tikki is proud of himself because he helps the animals and the humans by killing the snakes or dangerous animals. The humans first find him after the flood washes him out of his berrow. Teddy wants to give him a funeral but his mom seas that maybe he isn't dead. He helps a bird and he helps the humans. On Page 16 “Teddy shouted to the house: “Oh look here! Our mongoose is killing a snake.“ On Page 18 and 19 Rikki-tikki killed Nag, “The big man picked up Rikki-tikki and he had said it's the mongoose again, Alice: the little chap has saved our lives now.” Teddy's father, the big man beats the snakes after Rikki bites the snakes to make sure the snakes are dead. Rikki kills the eggs in the melon bead so that there aren't little Cobras around
The effect the reader perceives in the passage of Rattler is attained from the usage of the author¡¯s imagery. The author describes the pre-action of the battle between the man and the snake as a ¡°furious signal, quite sportingly warning [the man] that [he] had made an unprovoked attack, attempted to take [the snake¡¯s] life... ¡± The warning signal is portrayed in order to reveal the significance of both the man¡¯s and the snake¡¯s value of life. The author sets an image of how one of their lives must end in order to keep the world in peace. In addition, the author describes how ¡°there was blood in [snake¡¯s] mouth and poison dripping from his fangs; it was all a nasty sight, pitiful now that it was done.¡± This bloody image of snake¡¯s impending death shows the significance of the man¡¯s acceptance toward the snake. In a sense, the reader can interpret the man¡¯s sympathy toward the snake because of the possibility that he should have let him go instead of killing him.
Without love there is no loyalty, and without loyalty, there is no bravery. In the book and movie of the story Rikki- Tikki- Tavi, they were neck and neck. Snake against mongoose, though one must surely die, neither will back down just yet. The book, Written By Rudyard Kipling, and the movie, produced by Julie Ross, generally both carry the same plot and main idea: After being washed out of his home, and cared for by a loving family of three, he wants to repay them, and in the process does an unforgettable act of service. Though both the mediums were exciting, there were also numerous similarities and differences between the book, and the movie, such as the banana scene, the scene where the family first found him, and the resolution.
Mongooses can kill cobras in one single bite There once was a mongoose named Rikki-Tikki-tavi. He lived in the jungles of India. One day, Rikki was washed up to a house by a big storm. The family that lived there thought that Rikki had died but decided to wrap him in a warm cloth anyway. A little while later, Rikki woke up, ate some food, and wandered off to explore the garden outside the house. There he met a tailorbird named Darzee, and a muskrat named Chuchundra. They were sad because Nag, a cobra, ate a baby bird. Just then, Nag and his wife Nagaina showed up and introduced themselves to Rikki. They knew that Rikki-Tikki-tavi would eventually save the garden and they would then be forced to leave. Both the printed copy and video show the same plot but also have some differences.
The author of the short story, Rikki-tikki-tavi, is Rudyard Kipling. Rikki-tikki is a mongoose. A mongoose is like a little in in his features, but like a weasel with their habits. Throughout the story, Rikki-tikki defends the family from predators. Rikki also defends his new animal friends. He, though he was scared, fought heroically two cobras and a snakeling. Rikki had some help, but otherwise he faced the predators alone. Rikki-tikki has the right to be proud.
First, Nagaina shows great stealth when she tries to kill Rikki at the beginning of the short story, “...just under him whizzed by the head of Nagaina, Nag’s wicked wife” (19). Darzee, the foolish bird, warned Rikki Tikki just in time to jump. If he hadn’t, Nagaina probably would’ve had success with her stealthy plan. Rikki could’ve bitten her back but, “He came down almost across her back, and if he had been an old mongoose, he would have known that then was the time to break her back with one bite; but he was afraid of the terrible lashing return stroke of the cobra...” (19). After that, Nagaina and Nag slither off steaming knowing that they could have gotten rid of Rikki Tikki if it weren’t for the crazed bird.
Many people may or may not have heard of or read, the fictional short story called "Rikki Tikki Tavi", by Rudyard Kipling. Within this story, there are six main characters which include, Rikki Tikki Tavi, a mongoose, who is written as the protagonist. Nag, Nagaina, and Kurait, who are snakes, and the antagonists of the story. Teddy, Teddy's parents, and tailorbirds, Darzee and his wife, are all minor characters. This short story is about a small mongoose that was found by Teddy and his parents, a British family. Rikki Tikki Tavi protects his newfound family from three snakes trying to cause them harm. This story reveals Rikki Tikki Tavi's courage, wittiness, and love for this family.
Rikki could have tried to create a friendship with the snakes (even though his business in life was to fight and eat snakes), but he did not. He chose to go after the cobras to
The story of Rikki-tikki-tavi is a short fictional story by Rudyard Kipling.It is about a mongoose that is washed up from a summer flood. He is than found by a family and he is than revived. He fights two cobras that want to kill the family that saved Rikki-tikki-tavi. The two cobras are Nag and his wife Nagaina. Rikki-tikki-tavi than fights the two cobras and defeats them, saves the family. The narrators point of view influence the reader's conflict between Rikki-tikki-tavi and Nag by telling the story very descriptive.
The comparison of the rattlesnake to a bigger, more frightening, and yet less deadly creature makes the former seem dangerous. While a blacksnake would “flee at the sight of a man”, the rattler proved its fearlessness with the way he “held his ground”. The rattler is cocky, and for good reason, because his poison could kill the man much easier than the theoretical blacksnake could. The man is in a life-threatening situation and the reader is likely to sympathize with his fear and worry. The author uses violent diction when describing the snake to make us see him as a vicious creature, in need of killing to keep others safe. Even dead, the rattler “may still bite”. He needs to be kept as far as possible from people - especially vulnerable people, such as young children - in order to protect them. The author includes this hostile wording to bring awareness to the fact that the snake is remorseless, even in death, and that taking its life is noble and just. Finally, the snake’s “little song of death” is personified negatively by the man to show that the snake is the villain in the story. Life is, according to the rattlesnake, “dear and would be dearly sold”. It comes to light in this phrase that the snake is looking for revenge from the man’s actions. The rattler is not as innocent as he may have initially seemed. As he attempts at the man’s life to bring
the man had to remove the snake from the farm, but can't understand why he had to kill the
Does being the antagonist always mean you are evil? In AELA this year, we read a short story called Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, by Rudyard Kipling. In the story, the main character, a mongoose named Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, is washed out of his home, and taken in by a family of people. In the backyard, there are two snakes, Nag, and his wife Nagaina. Rikki has to fight the snakes in order to ‘save’ himself, and the other creatures in the backyard. That is, however, only Rikki’s side of the story. This essay is about Nagaina, and how she may be more than just an evil antagonist. In the story, Nagaina is not only sly, but also intelligent and caring. Almost everything Nagaina did was for her children, still eggs at the time.
In many ways I think the woods can be seen as the Garden of Eden. When they are sold, they are sold to a man called Tilman, and he is represented as a serpent:
Next, the mongoose has many different defenses that could be used to find food, and much more. According to Grolier Online (2015) “Mongooses are almost always victorious because of their speed, agility, and timing, and also because of their thick coat.” By being quick, and by having great timing the mongoose could easily avert the King Cobra’s strikes. Also, According to Funk and Wagnall’s (2014) “to whose poison they are not immune-by agile avoidance of their strikes.” By being agile (which means quick and well-coordinated in movement.) the mongoose can move swiftly to avoid the cobra’s