This leads to protest, revolts, and mutinies such as it did in the scenario. Therefore, while security is imperative, undermining citizen’s liberties threatens the structure of democracy by restricting freedom, creating chaos and generating disloyalty in citizens. Giving citizens individual liberties is perhaps one of the most important aspects of a democracy because it differentiates it from other forms of government. Democracy is ... ... middle of paper ... ... press, and assembly. By doing so, they will create a secure environment within the state and have loyal citizens that are willing to fight for the security of country, regardless if it is right or wrong.
The source agrees with government intervention in crisis but allowing the government to intercede completely would allows them to surpass laws (taking away rights and freedoms), inevitably breaking rule of law. It would support the patriot act because it protects society from crisis but the patriot act allows for the confiscation of property and the suspension of rights and freedoms. By embracing the source, we would be embracing a society where the government can take away our rights and use their power to accomplish their own selfish means. Because of their negative consequences that result from the ideas in the source, society should not embrace it.
Therefore, while security is imperative, undermining citizen’s liberties threatens the structure of the democracy by creating chaos and disloyal citizens. In a society where freedom of speech, assembly, and press is highly valued, passing a law prohibiting “willfully cause or attempt to cause insubordin... ... middle of paper ... ...it was founded. This means that the country must not forget to give its citizens freedom of speech, press, and assembly. By doing so, they will create a secure environment within the state and have loyal citizens that are willing to fight for the security of the country as a whole, regardless if it is right or wrong. When a democracy finds itself in a problematic decision, it should choose to put liberty above the security of the people.
Even though justice acts as a way to loosely control the acts of citizens, it doesn't affect their liberty. Liberty is freedom. No one would want to live under a government under which they have no freedom and are controlled. Defense is also very important in a government. The protection of the people should be in high priority of the government.
By looking freedom of speech, democratic government is not that important to have it without these rights. People prefer democracy to avoid tyranny or suppression of others. The citizens of the United States need to protect these rights because they are fundamental to the human being to be free, have liberty. What Founding Fathers did is not enough, however, United States’ citizens has to work together for a better place, a better country, a better government.
In order to keep leaders from doing the wrong things, he says to just give them good advice and to trust them to rule and defend the state as they see fit. To be a good citizen in a Machiavellian government, isn’t too hard. Factionalism weakens the state so being involved in conspiracies and mobs would be the actions of a bad
In order to do that, a democratic government is better because the government’s decisions would reflect the thoughts and desires of the people, while dissent would be not only permitted, but considered. In order for a nation to become successful and satisfy its government and people, a democracy is the best choice. It allows freedom of thought and belief, personal rights, raises their standard of living, and allows their concerns and opinions to affect political decisions. However, in times of crisis, the government’s decisions and actions must be quick, and should assume what would be the best in the people, in order to do what is best for the entire nation. This mean temporarily suspending people’s rights and freedoms and controlling their thoughts in order to keep the nation secure.
And the government in other regions of the worlds, such as the Middle East, and countries that don't have a democratic government. These reasons are important for keeping our democratic government stable, and preserving it. The first indication of why our rights can help stabilize the government is due to the fact that without a certain right, it may show our government as corrupt, and from there it could lead to the fall of our government. Rights such as freedom to express yourself, freedom to worship as you wish, and freedom to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness can be important to set the role of how the citizens will approach future positions. If these rights were to be revoked from our citizens, this leads into a national problem, for our government, and eventually the downfall of it, as a whole.
The first one is connected with the respect and consideration people should live with. If the citizens of a country do not have the chance of giving voice to their discontent, they feel furstrated and inhibited. Freedom of expression is extremely important inthis case. People must have the opportunity of saying what the think in order to improve the conditions of living, without governmental censorship. Unfortunately, this freedom is sometimes exercised in a wrong way obliging the Government to use its power to censor demonstrators, because they behave violently and irrationally.
Nevertheless, the government should uphold fairness and not abuse its power unless it is necessary. Power is something that is earned; it is not something that is granted by default. The proper qualities, such as integrity, assertiveness and truth, in government or person can benefit its leadership skill set. Sometimes truth can be manipulated by the government to influence its people so that they will always have faith in their government. This should only happen if the nation is in great peril.