An Analysis Of Richard Lovelace's Poetry

1922 Words4 Pages

In the 17th century Britain a ’new wave’ of poets emerged, the one that would later be labelled the metaphysical poets. They had a very unique style that is very energetic, paradoxical, often enough to completely boggle the reader, and in a way entertaining for the way they hid their real point at times. How many times have we thought of them innocent, often thinking them to be saints and such? Certainly, in a way they are, but to enjoy reading them we have to be fully aware of the possible peiorativeness of their poems. But it’s not the only thing they wrote about. They also criticized the society although less likely. In my contrastive analysis I chose to analyse Richard Lovelace’s works, and make an attempt to assess what he was. Richard Lovelace’s personality is just as unique as his works are. He was a royalist until death, and while others preferred ’liberty and freedom’, the Parliament, Lovelace still …show more content…

First he talks about liberty as something that is birthright property, and then asks the question if there is anything that’s your own. Either this is a mark that some, like him, were robbed in the Civil War, robbed of something that was important for them. If Lucasta is both Liberty ,in its allegoric meaning, and Lucy then it is a moment of of life. Lucy was probably wedded by the time Lovelace wrote the poem in the prison. Reformation is shown like it was a two-edged sword, both as one that protects, and as one that strikes its foes. First Reformation, and just the religious one, even more a political one, is something that it had its time right then. But a Reformation given by the wrong man, is ’Like Watches by unskilfull men Disjoynted, and set ill againe.’ The reformation of his era is strongly critized in this poem even in the preceeding line: ’As to reforme were to ore'throw ;’ And then the Public Faith (Public opinion) is critized being ’banke-rupt of her

Open Document