Richard Hoggart's The Uses of Literacy

1139 Words3 Pages

In 1957 Richard Hoggart wrote The Uses of Literacy. His book was split

into two parts, the first looking at the era in which he grew up, the

1930’s and the second looking at the contemporary time, which was of

course the 1950’s. the aim of the book was to analyse what Hoggart saw

as the decline of the popular culture of the working class. He

discussed what was ‘good’ and ‘bad’ popular culture and what part they

played in the two times. These things are obviously a matter of

opinion and Hoggart puts his case to argue against the changes which

were occurring in the 1950’s, particularly with regards the moral

standards of the mass entertainment. In this essay Hoggart’s book and

arguments will be considered and then they will be evaluated.

In the first part of his book Hoggart looks at the popular culture of

the English working class of the 1930’s. He depicts the distinct

characteristics of the working class at that time and outlines in

detail a typical wedding and an example of a recreational activity of

them. He claims that the pastimes of the 1930’s working class were

generally group activities with everyone taking part at the same time.

The popular culture was therefore a reflection of this. As such

activities were a communal event they relied heavily on conventions

and everybody knowing what was expected of them and doing it.

The second part of the book looks at the contemporary (to the 1950’s)

working class. This part looks more at the popular culture of the time

rather than relaying the norms of it. It considers two sub cultures

and the popular cultures of them, one he critiques in detail, that of

the Teddy boys, who he calls th...

... middle of paper ...

...o enjoy one’s self

all the time causing a numbing of senses is one I am very interested

in. I feel it is a curious notion, it at first consideration makes

sense to me; over stimulate something and you will deaden it. However

after further consideration I began to contemplate what else is one to

consider if not how much one wants to do something and how enjoyable

it will, what other point to something could there be. I think though

Hoggart’s line of reasoning was that the constant need for instant

gratification will have this negative effect.

Bibliography

Storey J (2001): Culural Theory and Popular Culture An Introduction,

Dorchester: Prentice Hall

Storey J (1998): Cultural Theory and Popular Culture A Reader,

Dorchester: Prentice Hall

www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/HIShoggart.htm

en.wikipedia.org

Open Document