In this passage, Ionesco creates a parallel conversation between Berenger and his friend Jean, and the Logician and an Old Gentleman in a bar in which the first two are discussing Berenger’s life and the latter are discussion a syllogism. This passage serves to exemplify how logic can be twisted, absurd and inexplicable beyond human rationality. With this passage, Ionesco goes far beyond the literary realm and into the world, commenting on the brutalities of fascism that can take hold of human emotions through simple misconstrued “logic”. He does this by creating a parallel conversation between two separate parties discussing two separate topics. Both, however, use circular reasoning and get nowhere: Ionesco exploits this to prove the absurdity of logic. He also has both characters use logic against itself in their arguments, showing its’ fragile and inconsistent nature. By the end of the passage, Ionesco proves the irrationality of logic with regard to human emotion and its ability to be completely abused and misunderstood by others.
The parallel conversations create a back and for...
At another point the Marquis de Sade brings up some objections that people may have and then proceeds to break them down. He aims to `... treat these two questions separately...' (p. 134). By breaking down the argument as such, the reader is perhaps forced to consider the possibility that there is some form of logic in de Sade's thinking. It is also possible that this technique was used to add shock value, fool the reader into thinking that he has a serious argument and then shocking them all with his ideas.
The Cask of Amontillado is a short tale of revenge, written by Edgar Allan Poe. The two main characters in the story are Montresor, who is the murderer, and Fortunato who plays a wine connoisseur and the victim. In this dark story, we can see a lot of irony, hate and revenge coming from the main character who has been planning this all along. In this essay I will analyze, examples of irony and foreshadowing used by the writer, symbols and themes, among other things. (Hasanbelliu)
Lorcher, Trent. "Symbolism and Irony in 'The Cask of Amontillado.'" SForsyth, 10 September 2013, web. 17 November 2013.
The four scenes that best illustrate the theme of selfishness and the realities of a self-centered life, and empathy are the first scene in which Juvencio begged his son to save him, the scene in which Juvencio describes the crime he committed with a total lack of empathy, the scene in which don lupe describes the viciousness with which Juvencio killed his father, and the scene in which don lupe’s son orders that Juvencio be killed. All of these factors add up to a very interesting work of
The pause unveils the self-awareness of the inadequacy to teach anybody by committing a crime and killing. This assumption is reinforced by the Don’s question, which encapsulates his ability to deviate the conversation from these terms and move forward to other issues. All in all, we can assert that Mamet strives to show what is hidden behind the language, therefore, he must get rid of the conventional language in order to grasp the essence of reality. In this account, the use of the inverted language stands as an attempt to grasp reality but at the same time, he is striving to unveil what is hidden behind it, that is, Mamet has a critical agenda towards the American society and capitalism, with the conventions of American society.
...reader to gain inside thought into how bad the mental condition is affecting him as his behavior allows for further indication of craziness as a result from the schizophrenia. The evidence presented in this play for the scientific explanation of this literary classic is quite prominent as it gives an insight into what a schizophrenic acts, thinks, and behaves like.
Nevi, Charles N. "Irony and ‘The Cask of Amontillado’.” The English Journal 56.3 (Mar 1967): 461-465. Literary Reference Center. Web. 11 May 2014.
In “The Cask of Amontillado,” Edgar Allan Poe uses irony to develop his theme of a man who seeks salvation through repression. The narrator begins by telling us that Fortunato has hurt him. Even worse, Fortunato has insulted him. Revenge is another reoccurring theme throughout the story. He meets Fortunato, who is all dressed in jester clothes for a carnival celebration and is already extremely drunk. The narrator mentions he has found a barrel of a rare brandy called Amontillado. Fortunato expresses a lot of interest in verifying the wine’s authenticity. The author, Edgar Allan Poe, writes of Fortunato and Montresor 's revenge. “Montresor is compliant with Fortunato, and they both are prideful, but they both downfall into a horrific ending. The use of language by Edgar Allan Poe supports the understanding of the relationship between the two men “(Poedecoder). Despite the two men sharing common characteristics, one desires
Edgar Allen Poe’s tale of murder and revenge, “The Cask of Amontillado”, offers a unique perspective into the mind of a deranged murderer. The effectiveness of the story is largely due to its first person point of view, which allows the reader a deeper involvement into the thoughts and motivations of the protagonist, Montresor. The first person narration results in an unbalanced viewpoint on the central conflict of the story, man versus man, because the reader knows very little about the thoughts of the antagonist, Fortunato. The setting of “The Cask of Amontillado”, in the dark catacombs of Montresor’s wine cellar, contributes to the story’s theme that some people will go to great lengths to fanatically defend their honor.
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor sets out on a vengeful mission that will end Fortunato’s life in an untimely fate. Montresor appeals to Fortunato’s love for wine to tempt the unsuspecting fellow to his impending doom. While Montresor tricks the foolish Fortunato frightfully, it is ultimately Fortunato’s pride that leads to his demise in the crypt. Poe uses several literary devices to foreshadow this murderous exploit of Montresor. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and imagery, the story entices readers to delve into the relationships and differences between Montresor and Fortunato.
In this theoretic play, Christopher Marlowe presents a man that is well educated, but is in search of more than what education can give to him. Dr. Faustus is a man possessed by himself, blown up in pride, and blinded by his own intellect. This blind, self- centered man challenges the ideals of death and the Devil. The first scene opens with Dr. Faustus in his study, he is seated, and then he begins to speak in depth of what he wants to do. He talks of his graduation from the different levels of education. With his words there is an air of hubris, he wants all to notice him, and what he has accomplished. He claims that logic has overcame him, more of a pun or a sarcastic reach on his audience. He goes on to say, should logic be disputed or is it the main thought in the end. And without logic then what is there? So he finally contends that he has read it all and that he knows all the logic that he needs to know.
The theatre of the absurd encompasses a form of drama that emphasizes the absurdity of human existence by employing repetitious, meaningless dialogues and confusing situations, breaking the logical development, giving way to irrational and illogical speeches. A godless universe, human existence has no meaning or purpose and therefore all communication breaks down. The theatre of the absurd is sometimes defined it as a “working hypothesis”, a device, instead of a real movement. Martin Esslin in his book the “Theatre of Absurd” quotes that absurdist theatre has renounced arguing about the absurdity of the human condition; it merely presents it in being- in terms of concrete stage images”. He indicated too, the influence of Camus’ Existentialism behind the absurd, with the idea that men are trapped in a hostile universe that was totally subjective, describing the nightmare that could follow when solitude and silence were taken to the ultimate degree.
The theme of madness is explored in depth in Act 3, as many forms of madness in different characters are found. King Lear in particular is driven to a mad state and is followed by others who have gone ...
The paper seeks to interrogate the motives of power as sought by the principal characters in Soyinka’s Madmen and Specialists, using psychoanalytic critical tools. Soyinka’s play highlights the challenges inherent in a system made dysfunctional by misguided leadership. The protagonist, Bero, appears to hanker after inordinate desires of power and omnipotence, and in the process orchestrates disruptive processes within the polity. So strange and inexplicable are his actions that they invite comparison to Freud’s idea of Oedipus complex, an unnatural phenomenon of predilection for domestic sexual crises and homicide. The renowned French psychoanalyst, Jacques Lacan, has extended the Freudian examination of this tendency to the wider spheres of social and political life, which helps to provide insight into Soyinka’s Faustian protagonist. By analyzing Dr Bero’s enigmatic behavior in the play as an Oedipal phenomenon, it is possible to make some sense out of what ordinarily is a confounding character. Moreover, it also helps to clarify the vexed question of leadership and power that so often recurs in Soyinka’s oeuvre.
Why would a Rhinoceros be so important to anybody? I mean all they are, is simply an animal. We see animal’s every day in our lifetime, maybe not as big as a Rhino but still. Animals are animals. Well apparently not so much to the Shang Dynasty. They were so much more than that. A Rhinoceros was a very sacred symbol that showed great power. Only the emperor was allowed to own them. The Shang Dynasty was the very beginning of the Bronze Age, they had made many food and wine vessels made of gold used for ancestral offerings. These traditions still continue in China, considering there is still and Emperor.