Persuasive Speech Rhetorical Analysis

928 Words2 Pages

A persuasive message tries to convince the audience to agree to the speaker’s position. For instance, the goal of persuasion is to lead. On account of this, persuasion is just a logical and well supported arguments; an argument is the enounce of the orator’s position with the aid of the rhetorical strategies (logos, ethos and pathos).But the question is how to be a successful persuasive speaker? The response is easy, convince the audience or change their behaviour without using any strategy that violate any of the ethical principles. Subsequently, is possible to persuade using any of the rhetorical strategies. The first rhetorical strategy is ethos, there are three approaches to achieve it and in the same time to understand our audience, it …show more content…

In addition, there are four ways to enhance the orator’s credibility is by competence, sources, nonverbal delivery and vocal expression. Competence is the ability to annex any comment in the appropriate place of the speech, it is important to let know the audience why they can trust the speaker and what he/she is saying. The second way to enhance credibility is to use evidence for respected sources. A non verbal delivery is important to enhance orator’s credibility, given that it comes from the audience’s observation. The last one is the vocal expression, credibility is compelling when using the correct volume and the sound of your …show more content…

The first argument is sign, it is about the characteristic or situations that accompany the phenomenon but does not create the claim; in other words the claim is the evidence of all the events that have occurred; however, in order to make an effective sign argument, a sufficient number of signs are necessary and the conclusions should be drawn from the signs cited.The second argument is example, examples are used as evidence in order to support your claim; in order to have a successful argument for example to keys are necessary, to have enough examples cited and must be similar to all within the category. Argument analogy is the third type of argument, in this classification the evidence used to support the claim with a single comparable example is significantly similar to the subject of the claim; the argument must have subjects compared similar in every important way, as well as more similarities than dissimilarities; with this being said the argument will be valid only if it follows the given descriptions. The last type of argument is causation, this argument supports the claim by citing events that occurred as a result of the claim; in order to make this argument valid, other events should not be more important in causing the events, and the most important characteristic for this argument is that the effect should follow the

Open Document