Rhetorical Analysis of "Gays Have an Equal Right to the Folly of a Las Vegas Wedding"

611 Words3 Pages
With his political cartoon, David Horsey provides an effective counter-argument to a common anti-gay claim through the use of irony and comedy. Horsey addresses the argument that gay marriage would ruin the sanctity of marriage. The cartoon was made around April, at the same time as Supreme Court rulings on the Defense Of Marriage Act and Proposition 8. By addressing the argument, Horsey is using pathos to allow the reader to make their own conclusion that this claim is incorrect. Rather than stating right out that the claim is incorrect, he proves this to the reader through ironic and comedic imagery and still allows the reader to come to their own conclusion. Horsey places his comic in a 24-hour Las Vegas chapel to prove his point, pointing out a major flaw in the anti-gay argument, which is that not all current heterosexual marriage is sacred. Rather, a large portion of the weddings that take place in Las Vegas are down under the influence of alcohol, not love, like with the intoxicated couple waiting in the window in the cartoon. He also promotes the idea that spontaneous Las V...

    More about Rhetorical Analysis of "Gays Have an Equal Right to the Folly of a Las Vegas Wedding"

      Open Document