Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Terror's Purse Strings'

1041 Words3 Pages

In “Terror’s Purse Strings”, Dana Thomas successfully persuades her target audience of general consumers to not purchase counterfeit products. Thomas’s purpose is to inform her audience that the notion of consuming counterfeit products being a victimless crime is completely false and the true harmful effects of consuming counterfeit products. In “Sweatshop Oppression”, Rajeev Ravisankar successfully persuades his target audience of general college students that they should take measures against corporations who knowingly use inhumane sweatshops to produce their products. Through the analysis of each writer's rhetorical strategies, the establishment of credibility, and stylistic techniques, I am going to compare and contrast Dana Thomas’s “Terror's …show more content…

Ravisankar concludes his expository essay by informing his audience about organizations like the University Students Against Sweatshops who are forcing corporations to source their clothes from respectful factories or they will not purchase their products. In ” Sweatshop Oppression”, there is a great emphasis on inhumane and harsh work environments known as sweatshops. Likewise, In “ Terror’s Purse Strings”, sweatshops are greatly emphasized to show the audience that purchasing counterfeit products negatively affects the livelihood of the sweatshop workers. The difference between these two emphases is the perpetrators behind the sweatshops. In Thomas’s essay, the perpetrators are various crime syndicates and in Ravisankar’s the perpetrators are major …show more content…

Throughout “ Sweatshop Oppression”, Rajeev Ravisankar utilizes various vocabulary words such as disregard, neglect, abhorrent, discouraged, and intimidated to invoke sympathetic emotions from his audience. Instead of using strong vocabulary words, Dana Thomas uses the stylistic device anecdote to emotionally appeal to her audience. Dana Thomas describes her experience partaking in a police raid of an illegal sweatshop that was populated by a dozen children between the ages 8 to 13 (Thomas 104). This anecdote causes a greater emotional response from the audience and the audience can emotionally relate to the issue with Dana Thomas. In her persuasive essay, Thomas stated this allusion “It was Oliver Twist in the 21st century” to invoke an image of cruel and inhumane work conditions on children

Open Document