In the article I read today called No food is healthy. Not even kale. The author Michael Ruhlman, indulges his thoughts about the food industry in the US and what is considered “healthy” and “unhealthy”. The language he uses is very modern and simple, as if you were actually having a conversation with him in person. The language he used was informal, I enjoyed this because I could really grasp his feelings about common misconceptions about “healthy” foods. Ruhlman’s rhetoric in the piece was to persuade readers to know more about the foods they were purchasing then just throwing it in the basket. In the article he mentions that he asked the lady if she knew what was replaced in her fat-free milk and she had no clue. He says “The woman apparently
Kingsolver asserts that this lack of a food culture is the cause of America’s obesity epidemic, supporting her assertion with statistics that state that we produce twice as many calories as we need. Kingsolver also describes the process by which almost all of the produce, such as corn and soy, are turned into oils or fed to livestock in factory farms. Those high calorie oils make their way into all of our foods, especially into junk foods. Junk food ads specifically target children, and yet when the children become obese, it is portrayed as a “failure of personal resolve”, leaving the companies producing the
Many in the U.S., today, try to eat well,balanced, meals to order to maintain a healthy lifestyle. They do so by purchasing their food at farmers markets or making their own meals, so their food isn’t processed or genetically modified. Even though people are trying to maintain health in order to live long lives, without medical complications, many don’t have the opportunity to pursue life like this. In “Research shows food deserts more abundant in minority neighborhoods,” the author, Kelly Brooks, portrays an anecdote and logical reasoning, from Kelly Bower’s research, to thoroughly describe the food deserts in poor minority neighborhoods and how this issue needs to be repaired.
This is an essay written in the MIT Sloan Management Review that presents the correlation between businesses and the issue of obesity in order to persuade businesses to take action in regards to preventing the issue. Therefore, its target audience is anyone who currently works in business or plans to do so in the future. In this review, the author begins by citing four internal and external reasons for which businesses should care about obesity: self-preservation, public criticism, employee productivity, and opportunity. The author proceeds by providing an idea as to how businesses can assist in reversing the trend. In order to do so, he analyzes what he considers to be the two sides of the obesity problem: physical activity and food consumption.
I am responding to the request to analyze Radley Balko’s article, “What You Eat Is Your Business” and make a recommendation for or against publication in The Shorthorn at University of Texas at Arlington. In order to respond, I have examined the rhetorical appeals of Balko’s piece and determined why this article should be posted in the next edition of The Shorthorn. I believe that the Shorthorn audience would be interested in what is being discussed regarding of obesity, things that could potentially affect their lifestyle as well as the professors. In “What You Eat Is Your Business”, Balko claims that obesity is the responsibility of the individual not the government, and how our government is allowing American to live an unhealthy lifestyle
In the speech “Teach Every Child about Food,” given at a TedTalk conference by Jamie Oliver, born in Essex, England. Oliver mentions he’s no upper class worker, but a middle class chef, who uses information and education as his weapon. Oliver’s objective in the TedTalk conference is to present people with children, nephews, grandchildren, etc., about their eating habits and our ignorance of food. Thus Oliver wants his audience to help make a sustainable movement, educate kids about food, inspire families to cook, and to allow people everywhere to fight obesity. Oliver creates credibility throughout his whole presentation with testimony, facts, accurate statistic,
Published In his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, David Freedman begins by talking about how misinformed people are about wholefood restaurants and stores. These stores are run by so-called health food experts. Freedman makes himself distinguishable himself from the position of Michael Pollan and his adherents. His adherents are known as Pollanites. They are the people who believe that processed food is the reason we have health and obesity issues.
Healthier food choices are hard to make because fast food chains are easier to come by, than a farmer’s market or a restaurant that gives healthy options. David Zinczenko’s purpose of creating this piece, is to inform the reader of the results of long term fast food eating and to persuade the reader to select healthier food choices over what they have been exposed to. Zinczenko’s article does both an effective and ineffective job of convincing the audience of his purpose because he does not address the counter argument, but it is harder on your wallet to eat healthy.
In February 2010, a remarkable chef and speaker, Jamie Oliver, presented himself to a TED (Technology, Education, Design) audience as ruthlessly real and charismatic. In his speech, “Teach Every Child about Food” he shares powerful stories of his anti-obesity project and makes the case for an all-out assault on our ignorance of food. Jaime Oliver’s speech aims to alter the perspective of Americans and their decisions about food and its effects. Since then, Oliver’s TED talk has been viewed across the nation and brought a reality to the issue with food education. Jamie Oliver successfully utilizes ethos, logos, and pathos to portray his belief that without the use of food education, America and its children will fall under the weight of its own obesity.
In Wendell Berry’s “The Pleasures of Eating,” this farmer tells eaters how their separation from food production has turned them into “passive consumers” who know nothing about the food they eat, or their part in the agricultural process (3). They are blindsided by a food industry that does not help them understand. Berry argues that the average consumer buys available food without any questions. He states consumers that think they are distanced from agriculture because they can easily buy food, making them ignorant of cruel conditions it went through to get on the shelf. Humans have become controlled by the food industry, and regard eating as just something required for their survival. Berry wants this to change as people realize they should get an enjoyment from eating that can only come from becoming responsible for their food choices and learning more about what they eat. While describing the average consumer’s ignorance and the food industry’s deceit, he effectively uses appeals to emotion, logic, and values to persuade people to take charge, and change how they think about eating.
Burgers, shakes, and fries. The lines at fast-food restaurants are absurdly long. There have been bountiful instances of families suing these businesses for selling unhealthy meals to the youths whose parents are outrageously angry. “Isn 't that like middle-aged men suing Porsche for making them get speeding tickets?” Stated Zinczenko in his published essay “Don 't Blame the Eater.” The youth still continues buying these toxic Happy Meals even after the prices increase. These unhealthy meals are the only way to consuming something affordable. Zinczenko’s words appeal to his audience, the youth or young adults, by explaining why nutrition facts are important, moreover, when informed of the facts it can prevent diseases, alike Diabetes.
Many people believe that the restaurant foods are healthy, but they still make the food with oil and seasonings. On the passage, "We Don't Need Labels" the story says, "The words "Lite", "Low fat", and "Heart Smart" do attract buyers. Restaurants are free to group selections according to reasonable health standards. This would probably mean more to the average consumer than trying to sort through the difference between 1350 and 1375 calories." This statement helps me to understand that "healthy" words does not always mean that the
When we think of our national health we wonder why Americans end up obese, heart disease filled, and diabetic. Michael Pollan’s “ Escape from the Western Diet” suggest that everything we eat has been processed some food to the point where most of could not tell what went into what we ate. Pollan thinks that if America thought more about our “Western diets” of constantly modified foods and begin to shift away from it to a more home grown of mostly plant based diet it could create a more pleasing eating culture. He calls for us to “Eat food, Not too much, Mostly plants.” However, Mary Maxfield’s “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, argues differently she has the point of view that people simply eat in the wrong amounts. She recommends for others to “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.” The skewed perception of eating will cause you all kinds of health issues, while not eating at all and going skinny will mean that you will remain healthy rather than be anorexic. Then, as Maxfield points out, “We hear go out and Cram your face with Twinkies!”(Maxfield 446) when all that was said was eating as much as you need.
David Robson unites chocolate lovers and ecologists alike with his article asking if junk food is better than healthy food for the environment. He researches the carbon footprint for the production of one hundred calories of food. He doesn’t include any macromolecules in his research, his research is aimed purely at measuring the ratio between carbon dioxide production and calories. Regrettably he reminds readers that this is not an excuse for a root canal, but a thought to keep in the back of our minds when we consider a well-balanced diet (Robson, David). The general field of study his article best represents is Ecology. It relates to the information covered in the textbook and this course through metabolism and ecosystems.
While the public fears murder or natural disasters, Jaime Oliver highlights the real American killer: heart disease, in his TED Talk presentation. He explains that he is not a doctor; rather he is a chef and activist for a healthier society. For the last seven years, he has worked to bring awareness to the issue of poor diets in America. Oliver says that people are living in a society in which they are accustomed to having fast foods and eating without the knowledge of what is being put into their bodies. He explains that two thirds of Americans are overweight or obese. The screen shows a statistic about the most popular killers of American people. While homicide,
Many people in America, from toddlers to the elderly, have shown numerous signs of bad health. People have the desire to keep on eating due to more, new things being merchandised as “new and improved items” from the producers. For example, nowadays, people are eating pure junk that they find satisfying on the grocery food shelf. As, stated by Michael Pollan, in his article, “Eat Food: Food Defined” he affirmed that “real food is the type of things that our