Rhetorical Analysis Of Feminism By Audre Lorde

536 Words2 Pages

In her essay, Audre Lorde argued that feminism was not being equally represented since white woman represented the majority of attendees at the New York Institute conference. Since she was one of two African-American women invited to the conference last minute, the issue of unequal representation for all races of women was brought to her attention. Lorde saw that if there is no difference or better yet diversity amongst feminist how can they hope to overcome a patriarchal structure that oppresses women’s freedom. Lorde's argument is persuasive because she uses rhetorical methods such as author's identity and ethos to get her message about how she feels about feminism and how it should be represented.
Feminism isn’t being fairly represented in Audre Lorde’s eyes. She noted that women of color and in Third World Countries do not have as big of a presence in the feminist movements. Although If feminism is supposed to empower women, why don’t all women have a fair share of the voice that is being represented? The conference represents that not all women, mainly white women see women of color as equals enough to include them in conferences that discuss feminism and all the surrounding topics around it. To show division and separation only takes away power from feminist and the message they are trying to get across, which involves equality in every …show more content…

In her own words, "as a Black lesbian feminist, having been invited to comment within the only panel at this conference where the input of Black feminist and lesbians is represented"(Lorde). She felt women of color weren’t being represented properly so she argued on the fact by focusing on how "the vision of the conference is sad, in a country where racism, sexism, and homophobia are inseparable"(Lorde). In addition her background allows her to know first hand that feminism should allow differences to strengthen the cause of

Open Document