Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criticisms of amnesty international
Importance of human rights
Importance of human rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Human rights have only been around since the 20th century. The issue raised is whether or not these rights belong to every person. Amnesty International provides a brochure arguing that not everyone has access to human rights. Amnesty International believes many people in third world countries are not given basic and fair human rights and they believe the Australian public should ‘speak out’ for these people. The front page of the brochure presents an image depicting a zip tie with writing over it. It states “You have the right to remain silent” with the zip being opened a small amount. This suggests that the zip is the lips of a person and they are not speaking out. Behind this image is another image with the same concept but the zip is more open and has the words “You also have the right to speak out”. The repetition of “right” shows the audience of the issue surrounding. Above this image, the writer of the brochure lists anecdotes of numerous ways of how human rights are breached. The writer does in an attempt to get the audience to feel empathetic for the people involved. Each of these anecdotes is used to also draw the feeling of empathy from the audience. The use of words such as “death”, “no justice” and “tortured” appeals to our sense of fear and fairness, with fear in the way these people are treated and the unfairness that they are …show more content…
They do this to make the audience feel that they can become someone who is of authority and thus gives them the ability to influence a change. Statistics are also presented to keep the interested and aware of the issue. The brochure told us that we had the right to remain silent but as we go on they ask the audience to “please don’t remain silent”. They do this to show the audience that they have a choice to do what’s “right”. It is also done to not make it feel like the audience is forced to donate but to be eased into doing
The All Lives Matter supporters believe that black people who were killed recently showed violence against the policemen and they were not innocents. The president of Amherst College Republicans Robert Lucido responses, “First, the Black Lives Matter group was originally titled ‘F--- the Police.’ The organizers of the Awareness week claimed that every 28 hours a black man is killed by a law enforcement officer, but they never mentioned that a law enforcement officer is killed every 48 hours in the line of duty. The organizers may have thought it clever, but such a title is utterly shameful” (Lucido). The author uses ethos by showing facts in his response that illustrates the opposite of what Black Lives Matter group claimed; however, these
I, along with many other people believe that as a human we deserve Human Rights, regardless of who we are of what our background is, where we live, what we look like, what we think or what we believe in. However this is not the case. In Australia we are believed to be a multicultural community and a diverse society. Nevertheless the way Asylum Seeker and Refugees are being treated is
“All machines have their friction―and possibly this does enough good to counterbalance the evil… But when the friction comes to have its machine… I say, let us not have such a machine any longer” (Thoreau 8). In Henry David Thoreau’s essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” the author compares government to a machine, and its friction to inequity. He believes that when injustice overcomes a nation, it is time for that nation’s government to end. Thoreau is ashamed of his government, and says that civil disobedience can fight the system that is bringing his country down. Alas, his philosophy is defective: he does not identify the benefits of organized government, and fails to recognize the danger of a country without it. When looked into, Thoreau’s contempt for the government does not justify his argument against organized democracy.
In “Four Human Rights Myths” Susan Marks discusses several conceptions (or misconceptions according to her) about human rights. She begins her paper with a case study of the 2011 London riots and how distinctively different is their coverage by the British prime minister and two scholars.
Law Foundation, L.F. 1997. A Bill of Rights for Australia - But do we need it? [Online]. [20th December 2016]. Available from:
Although, asylum seekers and refugees are given a few options if they feel as though their rights are being breached, like they can apply to tribunals and courts to view their visa related decisions, they can also make a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about their human rights being breached in immigration detention centres, yet they do not have control over who enters the country, the government is not obliged to comply with the recommendations that are made. Although the government has made few attempts to comply with the human rights obligations towards asylum seekers and refugees by introducing new policies and prioritising the safety of the children in these detention camps, there are currently still many breaches towards their rights that the government continues to adapt, therefore they are still constituting a breach of international law.
Human rights abuse exist all over the world. It affects millions of children, women and men every day. These victims endured abuses such like slavery, discrimination, torture and oppression. Amnesty International is an organization who fights for injustice and human rights worldwide. In this ad for the campaign, “Ignore us, Ignore human rights” Amnesty International uses different colors to show humanity. The appeal to fear is used to urge people to speak out for the tortured and oppressed. The appeal to help the helpless is used to move people to feel the need to defend human rights abuse. The appeal to belong is used to show the human need to be part of something, and an impacting image to create awareness of the abused of innocent humans. Human rights abuse is something we can’t ignore.
Throughout Thoreau’s essay, he expressed his opinions and beliefs on the importance of civil disobedience in a society. He talked about how one must use his or her moral sense, conscience, to decide what is just and unjust. From here, Thoreau urged his readers to take action, to stop the machine from continuing its lifeless duty. His call to action is if a system is prone to corruption, the people must disobey it. This means that personal endangerment may be needed to do what is right. Going against the status quo to uphold justice and ethics is the basic message behind Thoreau’s essay.
• Amnesty International: Australia- governments dismissal of UN criticism undermines hard earned credibility in human rights diplomacy.
Overall Australia’s human rights record is of high-quality but is blemished by few human rights violations. Australia has freedom of speech, a corruption-free legal system, legal protection against discrimination, access to secondary education, the right to vote in elections, access to clean water, privacy protection, freedo...
Globalisation has increased modern technology all over the world enabling more people, such as globally separated families, to maintain contact. Increased media coverage also draws the attention of the world to human rights violation which can lead to an improvement in human rights. This is not a reflection of all marginalised groups. In Australia, the detention of unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) contravenes the United Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), however the media are prohibited to enter detention centres and report on this issue (Cemlyn and Briskman, 2003).
The “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” is a human right charter that Amnesty International focuses on. The articles in the declarations states the rights every human being in the world should have. An important article the freedom of expression, permits every citizen to speak without censorship and/or limitation. It is a basic human right that every citizen in the world should have but many don’t. In countries such as Burma and North Korea, citizens got beaten up or imprisoned when anything negative were said about the government. Even in developed countries, workers aren’t allowed to complain about their poor working conditions. To raise awareness and aide people about the situations, Amnesty Internati...
The role that globalization plays in spreading and promoting human rights and democracy is a subject that is capable spurring great debate. Human rights are to be seen as the standards that gives any human walking the earth regardless of any differences equal privileges. The United Nations goes a step further and defines human rights as,
Human rights have been defined as “basic moral guarantees that people all countries and cultures allegedly have simply because they are people. Calling these guarantees “rights” suggests that they attach to particular individuals who can invoke them, that they are of high priority, and that compliance with them is mandatory rather than discretionary. Human rights are also international norms that help to protect all people everywhere from severe political, legal, and social abuses.
Over the past 100 years, the world has changed significantly regarding its freedom and human rights. However, some countries still to this day are experiencing the lack to express those “rights”.