Men across the thirteen colonies fought against the British Army with many different reasons which allowed for a new country to develop. Mark Lender, Charles Royster, Gregory Knouff, and Gordon Wood each show reasons for why men chose to enlist in the Revolutionary War. Of the four historians, Gregory Knouff’s interpretation is the most convincing of why the people decided to join the revolution. Knouff’s argument explained why economic and patriotic reasoning was not the strongest motive. He also looks deeper into the internal conflicts occurring in communities and how their social conflicts and political desires for change in their community triggered enlistment. Gregory Knouff stated that the men’s main motive to fight was based off …show more content…
According to Charles Royster (claimed that the men who enlisted fought out of patriotism and self-sacrifice for a free country), the majority of men that joined the army were in their late teens early twenties. Since the majority were young they did not have as high of economic need as others: “most soldiers were under the age of twenty-three years old and owned little or no property” (83-84), which means that economics was not their main motive for joining. Gregory Knouff agreed that there was a motive for economics. He, however, asserted that economics and bounty money was only a reason for enlistment for a small sum of people. Even though there were men who joined only for financial gain many enlistments were not for these reasons. Those who enlisted for economics were commonly poor rural men, and many went for other reasons that were not based on self-interest: “poor men who served in the place of others…often received bounty money. Many… went in place of their fathers and brothers” (91), because they went as substitutes, they went the desire to allow their fathers and brothers to stay behind and keep businesses open to help their families continue to gain …show more content…
According to Charles Royster, patriotism, and the willingness to sacrifice yourself for the new country was the key motive to men entering the continental army in the war. Mark Lender, however, proved that specific motive while existent was not the main reason. Mark Lender started his essay by outlining that the near beginning of the war men did patriotically enlist. He does this by informing his readers of a Captain’s response to his new company: “for they had enlisted, he assured himself, not out of hopes of personal gain, but ‘from motives purely to serve their country” (75). Patriotism as the main purpose lasted only a few months as men became discouraged: “defeats…had demonstrated the harsher aspects of soldiering, the cause alone would no longer keep men in the field” (76). Men needed more than the building of a new country to be at war for as hard as conditions were. Along with Lender, Knouff also shows that there are flaws in Royster’s argument. Royster’s points are passive as well, making it hard to convince someone that self-sacrifice is the reason men enlisted. Knouff noted that his information is more opinionated thought than actual evidence: “he assumes comparable motives” (88). Royster made many assumptions, whether that was his intention. Even though Knouff believes nationalism was a compelling cause for enlistment, Royster’s way of formulating his ideas led to being unsuccessful in his
Click here to unlock this and over one million essays
Show MoreOverall McPherson’s reasons for the soldiers motivations were clear and concise, easy to follow and understand allowing for easy interpretation of the book. McPherson also includes multiple quotes from various letters and diary entries to support his statements which gives his statements credibility. The reasons for motivation presented in the book were convincing and were supported by numerous quotes.
The book ‘For Cause and Comrades’ is a journey to comprehend why the soldiers in the Civil War fought, why they fought so passionately, and why they fought for the long period of time. Men were pulling guns against other men who they had known their whole lives. McPherson’s main source of evidence was the many letters from the soldiers writing to home. One of the many significant influences was how the men fought to prove their masculinity and courage. To fight would prove they were a man to their community and country. Fighting also had to do with a duty to their family. Ideology was also a major motivating factor; each side thought they were fighting for their liberty. The soldier’s reputations were created and demolished on the battlefield, where men who showed the most courage were the most honored. Religion also played an important role because the second Great Awakening had just occurred. Their religion caused the men who thought of themselves as saved to be fearless of death, “Religion was the only thing that kept this soldier going; even in the trenches…” (McPherson, p. 76) R...
More confederates than unions were illiterate due to the fact that most held professional or white-collard jobs (36). To make the Union soldiers sample fair sense most blacks couldn’t read or write, 2 who could were included in the sample (36). The levels of patriotism differed from the upper and lower south given to the fact that the upper south were mainly cotton states. The confederates felt as if it was a “rich mans woar but the poor man has to do the fifting” (16). The confederates were mainly fighting for “independence, property and way of life” (27). Some characteristics the soldiers had in common were McPherson’s calculations for the Union. He came to seeing that out of 562 Union soldier’s letters read only 67 percent voice strong patriotic motives. This is the same as the two-thirds of Confederates. As a result from reading McPherson’s book, research showed that the Union and Confederate soldiers expressed about the same degree of patriotic and ideological convictions. Even though they both had different reasons for fighting the levels of sincerity and dedication in their notes were
There were several proposals for conscription in the War of 1812. Conscription was close to being enacted when the war ended. The plans essentially involved shifting some of the burden of financing the military to individual classes of twenty-five men. If a member of a class could not be induced to volunteer, the class would pay a tax based on its members' wealth.
During the majority of the war, men were guided into civilian and military positions through a policy that the Selective Service Director Lewis B. Hershey called "channeling." The draft system used induction as a threat to "channel" people into more desirable pursuits that were in the interests of the nation. For instance, an engineer earned a deferment from the war because he was needed at home while a person who did not have a deferment could be inducted into the army. For every solider in combat, there were many other positions that needed to be filled...
The Conscription Act delivered the final straw in the long list of discrepancies, the catalyst that turned that small forest fire into a raging inferno of hate and fear. The white working class (mostly Irish immigrants) were infuriated, they couldn’t understand how they, white, hard-working voters were being punished. The government was forcing them to fight a war they didn’t support and the only way they could avoid it was to pay 300 dollars (a years wages for most), yet they would pay African Americans 1,000 dollars for volunteering. The new federal draft conditions also expanded to include a wider age range of men it would take. “The conscription law targeted men between the ages of 20 and 35, and all unmarried men up to age 45.” Adding to the already high tensions of laborers, since the enactment of the Emancipation Proclamation they ...
The new acts of the Colonial Era sparked a controversy between the American colonies, the British Government, and the British Parliament. The British felt that the colonists should be held responsible for the debt owed by the British armies while they were protecting the colonies during the French and Indian War. The colonies strongly disagreed and upon hearing this the British devised a strategy against its relations with the colonists that would continue to make things worse between the two nations.
sacrifices along is journey of being captain of Continental Army. He had to watch as many of
Creating a nation out of the remains of a war is never an easy job. There were many different debates involved, along with treaties, and even more battles. Even a hint of jealousy can turn tables on countries.
Before the American revolution began, people were unhappy about how Great Britain, has acted towards them, and a lot spoke out such as Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, and Patrick Henry. These men were influential orators or writers in the 1700s. These writers opened the people’s eyes to how Britain was treating them, inspiring people to have a revolution. They made the war a necessity for the colonists to have. Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, and Patrick Henry made the American Revolution morally justifiable because the colonists were being unfairly treated, they tried everything in their power to make peace, and they were constantly being ignored by Great Britain; a war was the last resort.
The American Revolutionary War caused the widely accepted written and unwritten laws of society to be called into question. Many groups of people who had been deprived of freedom prior to the Revolution are some of the elite in modern society. Because a small group of colonists called out for liberty and stood up to the biggest military power of the time, many minorities were given the spark to do the same. People began using the “language of liberty” that was used in the Declaration of Independence to try to gain freedoms and rights in religion, economic situations, and in equality.
represented in Britain, and yet they were being taxed on things that those living in Britain
The conclusion of the American Revolution caused social and political change for America, but varied little change for economics. When the revolution ended, America wanted to change the political aspects and make them different than Britain's old government system. Because Americans were full of poor people and slaves, it was very difficult for them to construct a government. One of the reasons is lack of education. Social changes took a long time to occur, but women started to gain independence, which leads to gender equality. Slaves were set free but still experienced racism. Due to the war, there was a lot of debt, which took a tremendous amount of
A major motivator that got men to enlist in the Civil War was “rage militarie,” (McPherson, 16). In the beginning of the war, around 1861and 1862 (McPherson, 16), many chose to enlist; the draft had not started yet. With so many men enlisting, many others wanted to do so as well. It was a craze, and very excited phase of the war. “…the feeling runs mountains high, and thousands of men are offering their services where hundreds only are required,” (McPherson, 16). Many men felt obligated to enlist and defend their beloved country, or even just their hometowns, homes, women and families, because so many others had. The peer pressure on a man was to love their nation as much as their neighbor, which greatly influenced men to enlist in the war. This mania died down but would burst into life again when later points of crisis would become present, (McPherson, 17). The idea of “rage militarie” was present in both the Union and the Confederate.
A soldier, conscripted or not, will face many stresses during their career. Serving for any amount of time is a trial, but some are more suited to the military than others. A drafted soldier may go through their entire mandatory term feeling miserable and insufficient, completely overwhelmed by the tasks that military professionals easily complete. These pressures and the denial of a choice of career should not be placed on any person. The idea of a two-year term of mandatory military service being implanted has been brought up. Military service should not be mandatory not only because it violates fundamental individual rights of humans, but also due to the fact that a military based on volunteers would operate much more impressively than one comprised of conscripted soldiers who would not have chosen to serve otherwise.