Review of the Study Progress of Infants/Toddlers With Severe Disabilities by Salisbury, C. L., & Copeland, C. G.

1165 Words3 Pages

Salisbury, C. L., & Copeland, C. G. (2013). Progress of Infants/Toddlers With Severe Disabilities: Perceived and Measured Change. Topics In Early Childhood Special Education, 33(2), 68-77. doi:10.1177/0271121412474104

Purpose and Hypotheses of the Study

The study by Salisbury and Copeland (2013) had one purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine child and caregiver outcomes in a diverse sample of 21 infants/toddlers with severe disabilities who received services from an urban, Part C program where caregiver-focused intervention was emphasized.

Sample

For this particular study, the identification of all infants and toddlers who met certain requirements. The participants would consist of infants and toddlers who had severe disabilities and their primary caregivers. After going through to see which infants and toddlers met the criteria, 11 boys and 10 girls averaging the age of 10.76 months participated in the study. Out of the sample in this study, a little more than half of the children received their EI services in centered-based setting, while the remaining 9 were served at home. The selected caregivers that were in this sample reflected the economic, cultural/linguistic, and ethnic diversity. The study consisted of 21 caregivers. Salisbury C. & Copeland C. (2013)

Methods and Procedures

Salisbury C. & Copeland C. (2013) Due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of this study, a case study was designed that used a single program site. From this, three questions guided their work. Question 1 was to what extent did infants/toddlers with severe disabilities evidence improvement in key developmental areas during interventions. Question 2 was what child and personal changes were reported by caregivers base...

... middle of paper ...

...d its effects might vary from culture to culture and so it would be good for me to get a handle on it and get the help that is out there.

This particular study would have been great for the Chenkus and Higgs family to read as they battled with their son on his heart disability at 5 months. In 2013 CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/30/health/disabled-transplants/, wrote a report entitled, “Disabled baby denied heart transplant.” The family struggled when dealing with this and I think that knowing about this study would have been good for them. I think this would have been a good program for them to participate in so they could work together to get Maverick better. This is a study and program that needs to be heard about because I think it is very useful and will definitely be a help to the infants/toddlers and caregivers that require the assistance of the program.

Open Document