Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership in a Crisis
Overview of the Bosnian war
Leadership in a Crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership in a Crisis
Legacy of the War
Another good point made by Osland is lack of interconnectedness between people in dealing with challenges which are forming the legacy of the war such as corruption, organized crime and hardliner nationalism (p. 553). So, main challenge for the EU is instability of the state. If we add that the judiciary system is weak, it is clear that this mission could not be successful without the contribution of local people and officials. Osland gives some observations about local people but mostly about leaders. She may have looked at from the point of local people also. The citizens of BiH seem to suffer lethargy and a reluctance to take on the government and elites. After the war, they would have serious problem with “trust” which would make the job harder for the EU despite the strong legitimacy.
General Assessment
Osland has authority over the issue. As it is noted before she was a doctoral candidate when she wrote this article but it can be easily noticed that many authors cited this article. And also she was working in Norwegian Institute of International Affairs that also makes her credible. Author uses vast theoretical and empirical resources including high officials and experts such as Javier Solana, Susan L. Woodward. All these increase the accuracy of the article. I also found her article quite comprehensible that is anyone can understand her thesis since she provides historical and theoretical background and also mentions current organization. I criticized her by not including low politics however her main point is about high politics. Although her decisive thesis makes author more tended to security policies and claiming ESS is the main way for state building I do not found Euro-centric or western-centric, ar...
... middle of paper ...
...y Assessment of the European Union Police Mission to Date”, Paper presented at the 50th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New York City 15-18 February, p. 21, http://www.ifsh.de/pdf/aktuelles/ISAPaper2009Maras.pdf
Merlingen, Michael, “Everything Is Dangerous: A Critique of `Normative Power Europe'”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 38, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 435-453, http://sdi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/38/4/435
Quielle, Gerrard, “The European Security Strategy: A Framework for EU Security Interests?”, International Peacekeeping, Vol.11, No.3, Autumn 2004, pp.1–16
Vainio, Liisa, (2008), “Policing missions: the case of EUPM”, ISIS Europe – European Security Review no.41, November, pp. 1-6, http://isis-europe.eu/sites/default/files/programmes-downloads/2008_artrel_205_esr41-eupm.pdf
Weber, Max, (1922), “Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft”, Tübingen
In a recent White House brief, President Obama called the Russian invasion of Crimea a clear violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and international law. When assessing the Russo-Ukrainian crises in Crimea, the commander of European Command (EUCOM) and the Supreme Allied Commander of European Forces (SACUER) must account for U.S. interests in the region before deciding a proper course of action. This essay aims to assess four of the United States’ national interests through the perspective of EUCOM and SACUER. The first section will outline the role of EUCOM and SACUER in the European region and assess the overall problem of Russia invading Crimea. The second section will outline four of the United States’ national interests at stake: international order, trade and economic prosperity, energy supply, and freedom of the seas. In doing so, this assessment of U.S. interests in Crimea supports the options of non-intervention and a non-provocative stance in order to maintain long-term stability because the Russian invasion has only violated peripheral interests of EUCOM and SACUER.
...Territo, L., & Taylor, R. W. (2012). Intelligence, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. Police administration: structures, processes, and behavior (8th ed., pp. 90-99). Boston: Pearson.
International organizations such as NATO and the UN are essential not only for global peace, but also as a place where middle powers can exert their influence. It is understandable that since the inception of such organizations that many crises have been averted, resolved, or dealt with in some way thro...
The formation of the United Nations in 1945 marked a monumental success in the international political realm. It was founded to foster relations with its member and non-member states, encourage the respect of human rights, and fight to solve social, economic, and humanitarian issues. However, of all of these motives, its foundation was based primarily on creating peace and preventing conflict between members. The idea of collective security in the UN has become the heart of peace keeping within the union and all members vow to preserve peace and eliminate identified aggressors. Chapter VII of the UN charter is the impetus behind collective security and provides the legal foundation for the UN to eradicate all threats to the peace.
Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of international politics. 9. printing. ed. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. Print.
Tiersky, Ronald, and Oudenaren John. Van. European Foreign Policies: Does Europe Still Matter? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010. Print.
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. 71-81. Print.
This paper attempts to address two questions that are at the heart of this dispute: Do TSMs and INGOs have any real power in today's international political arena against the traditional view of state dominance? And, if the answer to the previous question is yes, then does such a change merit a fundamental revision of the state-centric model of international relations?
Bristol, Nellie. “Foreign Aid and National Security.” CQ Researcher by CQ Press. SAGE Publications, 17 June 2011. Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has been called the most complicated country in the world and rightfully so. Over the years, it has been the center of conflict for many different wars of several different nations, which have left the country scarred and bitter. To understand the complex country of Bosnia fully, one must study its basic history, culture, and government.
Theorin, B. (1999, January 14). Report on the environment, security and foreign policy (Hughes procedure) - Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy - A4-0005/1999. European Parliament. Retrieved March 28, 2011, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
The focus is on the issues of police accountability in modern society, and in particular why their accountability is more important than other professions. This is not surprising considering the amount of power and discretion police officers have, and the level of trust that the public holds with these civil servants. Police officers accountability is the biggest thing in their profession which has been an issue of concern they have to be accountable to the police department who want the officer to be an effective and responsible person, to people in the community who have best expectation from an officer and being accountable to themselves for their acts. An ordinary citizen of a country cannot obtain the powers that police officer’s have.
Europe has been militarily weak since World War II, but it remained unnoticed because of the unique geopolitical context of the Cold War: it was the strategic pivot between the United States and the Soviet Union. With the "new Europe", in 1990s, everybody agreed that Europe will rest...
Europe has a history of war and conflict that predates living memory and the idea of a united Europe is something that appears repeatedly in that history. Hitler, Napoleon, and the many Roman Emperors all sought a united Europe. Their quests although in many ways motivated by a horrifying desire for power sparked the minds of philosophers and other political thinkers to imagine Europe united in harmony and peace despite national differences. Today we have the European Union which is quite unique. After the horrors, bloodshed, and economic disaster of the twentieth century, in a desire for peace and harmony and economic and political prosperity twenty-seven states have limited their national sovereignty.2 With national interests and ambition still in mind these countries see the European Union and supranational governance and the benefits of peace and prosperity therein as something worthwhile. However, in the history of European integration there has been much conflict and Euroskepticism. Some see unity in diversity and diversity in unity as impossible, and the existence of differentiation in the EU as highly problematic. However, differentiation in the European Union’s integration process is not the hindrance it is often defined as, rather it creates further cooperation in Europe bringing the European Union closer to its objectives of peace, and economic and political growth, resulting in a more effective and efficient bureaucracy. Differentiation in the EU’s integration process has created more successful integration as it allows the nations who wish t...
Layne, Christopher 1994 “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2, Autumn