Research Article Analysis: Juveniles in Prison

2016 Words5 Pages

Research Article Analysis

This research analysis is meant to measure the effects of this particular program against the goals it set out to accomplish as a means of contributing to subsequent decision making about the program and improving future programming. This applied research study is an evaluation research project of social science that is intended to supply scientifically valid information with which to guide public policy. The goals of this evaluation research are to provide feedback to policy makers in concrete and measurable terms.

In 1994, Oregon voters passed Measure 11, which imposed long mandatory prison terms for 16 designated violent and sex-related offenses, prohibited “earned time,” and provided for mandatory waiver of juveniles to adult court. This measure, initially drafted by an Oregon legislator, was designed to set mandatory minimum sentences for a series of 16 violent and sex offenses. When put before the voters in 1994, the measure passed by 65% of the voters. Additional action by the legislature in the 1990s added five more crimes to Measure 11, bringing the number of crimes covered by the measure to 21. In general, Measure 11 penalties are longer than those imposed under sentencing guide lines. With the exceptions of some circumstances for some second-degree offenses, if someone is found guilty of a Measure 11 offense, these penalties may not be reduced, the minimum sentences are the same for all offenders, regardless of the circumstances of the crime, and regardless of their criminal histories. Sentences range from 70 months for second-degree assault, kidnapping, robbery, and certain sex offenses, to 300 months for homicide.

Juveniles aged 15 years or older are also subject to the measure. Measure...

... middle of paper ...

...reported a comprehensive aspect of Oregon’s sentencing policy, and the Misguided Measures study revealed a thorough assessment of Measure 11’s impact on youth. The report found that while there is much about Oregon’s approach to juvenile justice that is smart and effective, Measure 11 has not provided the effective sentencing voters were promised nor helped youth lead successful lives, free of crime.

References

Wight, S. (2011). New report analyzes 15 years of Measure 11 data and questions current policy of trying kids as adults. Retrieved from, http://www.safetyandjustice.org/files/Misguided%20Measures%20Press%20Release.doc.pdf

Wight, S., Ahmad, I., & Ziedenberg, J. (2011). Misguided measures: The outcomes and impacts of Measure 11 on Oregon’s youth. Retrieved from, http://www.campaignforyouthjustice.org/documents/Misguided_Measures_July_2011.pdf

.

More about Research Article Analysis: Juveniles in Prison

Open Document