preview

Research

opinion Essay
1495 words
1495 words
bookmark

Article Review/Questions #2 Everyday scale errors 1. What were the theoretical background and findings from previous research for this article? This research came about from previous researchers observing scale error behaviors within their homes, labs and anecdotal accounts from parents and other researchers. The results from previous research showed that children do try to fit their bodies into miniature size toys. All previous research has been done within a laboratory setting, and used procedures that increased the chance that children would make scale errors. 2. What were the aims/goals of the present study? The goal of the present study was to show that children make scale errors in everyday environments and not just in a lab setting. 3. How was the present study conducted? There were two studies which were conducted with internet surveys. Study 1 was to document everyday occurrence of scale errors. Participants were asked if they ever saw a child make a scale error and if they did, they were asked to describe what they saw. In Study 2, a different group of participants were asked to complete the survey and then a follow-up phone interview was conducted to provide any additional details about what the participants had reported in the survey. 4. What were the results/findings of the present study? In the first study, there were 221 participants and 40 reported one event that was counted as a scale error. Six participants reported two scale errors, which made a total of 46 examples of scale errors. Almost all of these scale errors were reported by parents who observed their children making scale errors. Study 2 had 84 participants that completed the survey with 41 of them completed a follow-up phone interview. The 41 participan... ... middle of paper ... ...eoperational, operational, and concrete operational. Piaget’s stages must be completed before going on to the next stage. Piaget’s stages imply that children cognitively develop on their own, without help from the outside. Both Piaget and Vygotsky believed that young children are curious and actively involved in their own learning. Vygotsky, however, placed more emphasis on social contributions to the process of development and Piaget emphasized self-initiated discovery. Vygotsky’s theory best matches my perspective. I agree that a child’s development is influenced by peers and adults. I also agree that culture influences how a child thinks and learns. I believe that God created us as social creatures and the source of cognition comes from the social environment. It is the interaction with other peers and adults that play a critical role in children’s cognition.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the research came about from previous researchers observing scale error behaviors within their homes, labs, and anecdotal accounts from parents and other researchers.
  • Explains the goal of the present study was to show that children make scale errors in everyday environments and not just in a lab setting.
  • Explains that two studies were conducted with internet surveys. study 1 was to document everyday occurrence of scale errors and a follow-up phone interview was conducted.
Continue ReadingCheck Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

  • Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Continue Reading