Republicanism and Direct Democracy

895 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: direct democracy v representative democracy

Republicanism and direct democracy, these are two ways that a people can be governed. There is a major difference between these two systems. In a republican system the government represents the people. The representatives are chosen by popular vote and are given the power to make decisions on behalf of the people. The people do not get to voice their own opinions, the best they can do is vote for their representative and hope he wins. This can also be referred to as indirect democracy. Direct democracy which was exemplified in the ancient Athenian city-state, or the New England town meeting in modern times, is a government based solely on the people. The governmental decisions are passed only if the majority of the people vote for it. "People", that is the key word, the people themselves are included in making political decisions.

Race: the descendants of a common ancestor; distinct variety of human beings; lineage. These are the definitions the dictionary gives for race. However, what really is race? And what causes human beings to dislike a specific race? There are many who disagree as to what the answers to these questions are. I would like to discuss two specific writers that argue about this issue, W.E.B. Du Bois and Manning Marable.

According to Du Bois there are two aspects that differentiates one race from another. Firstly, all humans differ in regard to their physical attributes (hair color, skin color), plus language also differs widely among humans. These differences, says Du Bois, plays a great part in diminishing one's ability to better himself in society; " Any striving, no matter how intense and earnest, which is against the constitution of the world is in vain." The constitution of the world ...

... middle of paper ...

...with this issue, continues Madison, is to have a republic. The republic will control and stabilize the effects of a faction. By having political decisions passed through a chosen body of people, whose true interests are only to benefit the country, the decisions will be more consonant to the public good. Madison agrees that certain things have to be worked out in a republic; however, this type of government is the ideal.

In conclusion, I, myself agree with Madison's view, as to what type of government is ideal. Secondly, I feel, that Madison and Du Bois go " hand in hand" with one another, they both agree that a republic is the only way that the minority will be protected from the majority. Manning Marable stands alone, that no matter what type of government you have, you will never win. The minority will always be on the bottom and the majority on top.

Show More
Related

  • Fahrenheit 451 Federalist 10 Analysis

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison believed the ways to eliminate factions by removing its causes and to control the effects. Even though factions cannot simply be eliminated, Madison believed that the destruction of liberty or to give every individual the same opinion. Direct democracy is not strong enough to protect its personnel, property rights, and have been characterized by conflict. It is surprising, but Madison recommended a strong and large Republic. He believed that there would be more factions, but much weaker than in small, direct democracies where it would be easier to consolidate stronger factions. Madison concluded his argument by saying, “according to the degree of ple...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The New Federal Constitution A Radical Experiment

    809 Words  | 2 Pages

    He discusses how Madison noticed the problem of each of the 134 states having its own agenda. Madison even thought that people were interested in their local politics. They don’t think of the whole state or even the whole country (Wood, 2012). He wanted to change this and create a stronger government that would override certain state powers like money printing and the ability to pass tariffs. He suggested that democracy was not a solution, but a problem (Wood, 2012). Basically, on a state level, he wanted to elevate decision making to limit democracy which was actually causing more harm than

    Read More

  • Federalist Paper 51 Summary

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    The republic should be able to, “guard the society against the oppression of its rulers,” but also “guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part.” If a nation is not primarily run by the people, then the government has the ability to oppress them by implementing taxes and laws and revoking basic rights without their consent (as witnessed in the events preceding the Revolutionary War). The separate state governments did not allow every person to have a voice for their country even though “A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government.” However, if too much authority is in the hands of the citizens, then, “the rights of the minority will be insecure,” because majority groups will be, “united by a common interest.” One analysis of these rights states that the “community will” (good intention of the government) is, “independent of the simple majority,” and that a government placing “power behind a group in society working against the public good” would be detrimental. Madison’s intention discussing factions is that we must strike a balance between representing the common interests of the people while not excluding minorities and placing trust in an unjust popular interest. The government of today takes into account Madison’s extensive concept of factionalism which includes the Republican, Democratic, and

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Analysis

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Federalist 10 James Madison argued that while factions are inevitable, they might have interests adverse to the rights of other citizens. Madison’s solution was the implementation of a Democratic form of government. He felt that majority rule would not eliminate factions, but it would not allow them to be as powerful as they were. With majority rule this would force all parties affiliate and all social classes from the rich white to the poor minorities to work together and for everyone’s opinion and views to be heard.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Federalist Papers 10 and 51

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison does not wish to reach the True, the Good, or the Beautiful in Article 10. He simply wishes to establish a system in which the detrimental effects of factions on the whole government are reduced and kept in check. The form of government he proposes himself is not entirely just, as the formation of factions within the government can be seen through political parties. If there are two groups of politicians with differing ideals concerning the rights of property holders, one for the large property owners and the other for the small property owners, we see here the development of a more refined faction under the guise of the label ‘party.’ Madison is not adopting a view of the True, the Good, and the Beautiful; he is simply offering a pragmatic solution, the ratification of a new constitution, to the problems caused by factions and does not present actual solutions to the specific problems.

    Read More

  • Federalist #10

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: one, to remove its causes and the second to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence.

    Read More

  • James Madison on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

    1007 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Madison, an American statesman and political theorist that was present at the constitutional convention. Many of the ideas proposed by Madison are part of the reason that the Constitution has withstood the test of time. Madison was ultimately prepared to deal with one of the biggest problems this new government would face in his eyes, factions. Factions, which as defined by Madison are “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community” (Madison 156). Madison addresses various ways that he sees factions can be cured of its mischiefs such as removing a faction’s causes and also controlling their effects. Madison points out that this is would potentially create an even bigger problem than the factions themselves by stating, “Liberty is to faction, what air is to fire, an ailment, without which it instantly expires” (Madison 156) Madison also stated that the way for a government to remove the cause of faction was either to destroy the liberty that causes factions to exist in the first place or to give every citizen the same beliefs and opinions. Madison deemed this impractical, because it is nearly impossible to give everyone in a given place the same opinions and destroying the liberty would take away the very thing that the colonies fought for 4 years earlier. The fact is Madison knew that the country wouldn’t be able to count on a well-educated statesman to be there any time a faction gets out of hand. Madison knew the only viable way to keep factions under control is not to get rid of factions entirely but to set a r...

    Read More

  • Essay On Federalist No. 10

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... party. Madison states that a republic, an indirect democracy, solves the problem of majority factions by introducing a filter in the form of an elected legislative, executive and judicial branch between the public and public policy.

    Read More

  • Essay On Federalist 10

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    The primary problem Madison addresses in this essay is that Madison felt that factions could be dangerous, meaning violent and could cause damage. One of the stronger arguments favoring the Constitution establishes a government very capable of controlling these factions.

    Read More

  • Federalists

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    The latter idea of Madison is to basically have everyone think in a homogenous manner, which of course is impracticable. As Madison puts it “As long as the reason of man continues fallible, and he is at liberty to exercise it, different opinions will be formed” (pg. A22) Men will always have a difference of opinion because we are always influenced by reason and self-love. Madison continues saying that the causes of factions are “thus sown in the nature of man” (pg. A22) and all we can do is try to control factions but it is impossible to rid of them completely. The federalist paper continues on to Madison’s feelings about having a democracy versus a republic and which he feels is a better decision.

    Read More

  • Pluralism

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Federalist No. 10, James Madison stresses that “measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Madison philosophized that a large republic, composed of numerous factions capable of competing with each other and the majority must exist in order to avoid tyranny of majority rule.# When Federalist No. 10 was published, the concept of pluralism was not widely used. However, the political theory that is the foundation for United States government was the influential force behind pluralism and its doctrines.

    Read More

  • Factions and the Constitution

    419 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Madison's Federalist 10, it is evident that he was not in favor of the formation of factions. He states, "…The public good is often disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties…" Madison made the point that the dangers of factions can only be limited by controlling its effects. He recognized that in order to abolish political parties from the government completely, liberty would have to be abolished or limited as well. For this reason, the government had to accept political parties, but it did not have to incorporate them into being a major part of the government. He says that the inclination to form factions is inherent, however the parties effectiveness can be regulated. If the party is not majority than it can be controlled by majority vote. Madison believed that in the government established by the Constitution, political parties were to be tolerated and checked by the government, however the parties were never to control the government. Madison was absolutely convinced that parties were unhealthy to the government, but his basic point was to control parties as to prevent them from being dangerous.

    Read More

  • Federalists and Anti-Federalists

    1659 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...he other hand, Madison discusses the topic of liberty in that it is what fuels factions. He says that removing liberty is one of the only ways to destroy a faction. He proceeds to state that this is not probable, and that factions can not be destroyed, but we must control their consequences in order to have a stable government. Madison believes that the Constitution preserves man's liberty by fairly representing them in a central government.

    Read More

  • James Madison and the Federalist Papers

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison, who glorified the benefits of the system of government outlined in the Constitution, wrote the tenth essay in the Federalist Papers. In his essay, Madison advocated a republic system of government instead of a democracy because it “promises the cure for which [they are] seeking.” According to Madison, in a republic, unlike in a democracy, a “small number of citizens [are] elected by the rest.” In other words, one difference between a republic and a democracy is the fact that a republic is based on representation, while a democracy is based on the rule of the majority (mob rule). Madison favors the republic form of government because representation (republic) recognized the inalienable rights of all individuals, while democracy is only concerned with the views or needs of the majority. Therefore, in Madison’s mind, a democracy is an unsuitable government, especially for the United States; Madison thought democracy is just handing power over to the ...

    Read More

  • Unequal Distribution Of Property And Factions

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Madison thinks the human nature is ambitious, and the fixed outcome of human ambitions is people create factions to promote their own interests. In the case of preventing corrupt or mischief by factions, he believes majority and pure democracy is not a solution. The method he advocated is a large republic with checking system. He converts human ambition to provide internal checks and balances in government. His point of view stimulated the approval of the proposal of the United States Constitution.

    Read More

More about Republicanism and Direct Democracy

Open Document