The immigration system in our country is something that needs work, old ideas and older laws hurt the people who try to come into this country legally and for some here attempting to become legal, yet for some reason the topic is rarely brought up in hopes for change. Luis Gutierrez is a democratic representative for Illinois and the main goal for Luis’s political career is to change that system once and for all. Countless numbers of families have been broken up and many children of immigrants have been put into foster care. Representative Gutierrez knows that this will be a tough task but has pledged his loyalty to the latino population in the United States to make sure change comes.
Documentary filmmakers Shari Robertson and Michael Camerini followed Representative Luis Gutierrez while he worked to get a bill passed through the house of representatives for immigration reform. We see Gutierrez not only work with advocacy groups on the matter but he also starts to work with different politicians so this bill can get passed, a republican representative from Florida Mario Diaz Balart joins Gutierrez on his goal hoping to bring Republicans and Democrats together on the matter. Knowing
…show more content…
Gutierrez feels that president does want to help with the reform but the president also believes it is something that should go through congress. When President Obama let’s Gutierrez know that if the house can’t pass a bill by the end of June that he will take
a.This document was written for Nonfiction lovers. The article, “John Rollin Ridge and Joaquín Murieta” has life learning experience that you can implement in your life. Joaquín is an innocent and honest man which results being punished for his honesty. Being an honest individual doesn 't always get you far in life but instead you can be persecuted which result of turning into criminal in society.
The La Raza Unida Party began in the 1960’s as a social movement in the small South Texas town of Crystal City. Although Mexican Americans made up the majority of the population at 85% they had very little clout within the political landscape, which was dominated by Anglos. The Mexican Americans experienced no political representation and many were denied the right to vote because they didn’t speak or read English and many could not afford the poll taxes. The discrimination experienced by the Mexican Americans in this small town was comparable to the discrimination of African Americans in the Deep South, yet the brave Mexican’s in Crystal City, Texas chose to band together to generate change, awareness, and hope in creating new perspectives with respect to politics.
PBS Frontline’s documentary, Immigration Battle, produced and directed by Shari Robertson and Michael Camerini (2015), portrays the life and death of the immigration reform bill. The film initially follows Rep. Gutiérrez who advocates the immigration reform bill that would give millions of undocumented immigrants an opportunity to become U.S. citizens. It was believed that the re-election of the president, Barrack Obama, was due to the high voters of Latinos and immigrants. By the increase in the Latino and immigrant electoral voters both
The strong voices of Arizona’s new immigration law are, Governor Jan Brewer, State Senator Russell Pearce (R), and the infamous lawyer Kris Kobach. Legal Director of Southern Poverty Law Center {SPLC}, Mary Bauer, states that some of the personalities behind Arizona’s new immigration law are highly suspicious. State Senator Russell Pearce (R), in 2006 forwards an email to his neo-Nazi supporters d...
Obama Administration proposed what is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform. It is composed of six sections aimed at fixing the current immigration system. It includes enhanced border enforcement, interior enforcement and the most controversial section; an amnesty program to legalize undocumented immigrants. In other words, it creates a pathway to citizenship for unauthorized immigrants that is fair and feasible. Many argue that even though Comprehensive Immigration Reform is good for America because it addresses important issues like creating a committee to adopt the number of visas available to changing economic times, preventing people from working without permits and creating programs aimed at helping immigrants adjust to life in America. Yet it rewards violators of current U.S. laws who entered the country illegally, and those who entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. Opponents of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform proposal claim that immigrants have a negative impact on the economy; overwhelming social services of many states, and posing a threat to American workers as a result of big corporations exploiting immigrants with low wages and poor working conditions. With the recent economic downturn and the severe recession that hit the U.S, many individuals blame immigrants for their economic misfortune and lack of employment. For both the opponents and proponents of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Proposal, for the millions of the undocumented immigrants and their families, and lawmakers; immigration has become an emotional political issue. Despite the resistance of many, America should embrace comprehensive immigration reform.
...g steps in helping out with any evidence we might know to the official authorities and FBIs. In doing all this we secure our borders by stopping gun flow, any types of drugs, kidnappings, murders, and the criminals causing it before it gets to out of control and start doing it on our side of the border. “We must employ the full spectrum of our law enforcement agencies` resources, expertise, and statutory authorities by continuing to work together, building on what we have done well so far and developing new ideas to refresh our strategies, we can rise to the current challenge. Again, thank you for your recognition of this important issue and the opportunity to testify here today” (Odgen6). Together, we can help the U.S and Mexico to work together more often to build a better border and a strong army of men designed for a better future in favor of the both nations.
In conclusion, I believe that the current immigration system is broken. Millions of illegal immigrants are living undocumented in the United States. This leaves an unfair system for all current citizens that pay taxes and immigrants looking to migrate into the country legally. Clearly there is a dire need for reform, and the proposal presented offers many solutions that can boost our economy and create various new jobs. The national GDP will increase heavily over the years and tourism profits will skyrocket as well as boosting our economy upwards. This reform can create new opportunities for the betterment of this country and allow room for growth in a variety of different aspects.
“What makes someone American isn’t just blood or birth but allegiance to our founding principles and faith in the idea that anyone from anywhere can write the next chapter of our story.” - President Barack Obama. The United States is the melting pot of the world. The great country of American was built on immigration. Look around, so many people have ancestor that risked everything to come to the United States to make something of their lives, and the lives of their children. If it weren’t for immigration, we may not be where we are today. Immigration reform is the term used in political discussion regarding changes to current immigration policy of a country (Immigration Reform, para. 2). In 2013 the Senate passed the immigration reform bill that would give a path to citizenship to the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. If the government passed Immigration Reform there would be many benefits to our economy, and to the individuals looking for a better future. For example, immigration increases the efficiency of the U.S. economy, it enables entrepreneurs to come to America, it brings increased national security, and immigration reform can reduce the deficit (Furchtgott-Roth, 4
Ewing, Walter. "The Many Facets Of Effective Immigration Reform." Society 47.2 (2010): 110-117. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Fitz debunks the myth that the U.S. cannot afford to pass the bill by providing statistical and analytical facts. Based on an analysis conducted by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the DREAM Act would actually reduce the deficit by 2.2 billion dollars over the next 10 years. In addition, Fitz states that deporting over 700,000 eligible students would cost taxpayers a hefty price of $16.2 billion over the next five years. He provides three basic options to solving the immigration issue: deport them, preserve the status quo and ignore their efforts, or sign the bill that would grant them citizenship and endless opportunities. Fitz believes that the first two options are “morally bankrupt and fiscally irresponsible” (Fitz), and that they U.S. cannot afford to pass up on the opportunity to reduce the huge
For over ten years, efforts to make changes to the United States immigration system have been put aside due to wars, attacks within our homeland and even worldwide financial crisis but it seems as though this being brought up more and more often. The history of the US immigration policy was more concerned with immigration enforcement over immigration reform. It was not until a few years ago that the US citizens voted they were tired of enforcement-only immigration policies and the pain they caused on immigrant families. So most feel now is the time to draw up new immigration laws that reflect American values and beliefs, and it ne...
In July of 2013, Congress reached gridlock when the House of Representatives refused to give its approval to, “a bipartisan Senate bill that would increase border security while also offering a path to US citizenship for the nation’s approximately 11 million undocumented immigrants” (“Immigration reform hits gridlock”). The House of Representatives is largely controlled by the Republican Party, who disagreed with Democrats regarding how to resolve the issue. They see it as giving amnesty to
Hennessey, Kathleen and Brian Bennett. "Obama urged to reduce deportations; Immigration reform advocates push the president to take executive action, or risk losing Latino voters' support." Los Angeles Times 8 March 2014: A.7.
The study also took a close look at how the courts deal with the issue, the administrative interpretation of the law, and the application of the reform to be very critical and increasingly impossible. The author discovered that immigration reform has chronic problems, citizens’ disinterest to participate in the political process, government inefficacy, and centralized decision making away from the very communities imparted. The lack of enforcement is mounting pressure on states’ budgets (appropriation and allocations) of resources as the number of beneficiaries for social services increased. On the other hand, Dorsey and Diaz-Barriza (2007) studied President Barack Obama stands on immigration when he was then senator and compared them to conservative and liberal position. In the research, the author lamented that then senator Obama called for a comprehensive immigration reform that would deal with the issues of border security, employers sanction for hiring illegal individuals and a path to earned citizenship. Both sides agreed in part, but disagreed with the issue of path to citizenship which created gray lack. Today, the debate continues between the both political parties and the states leading the president executive action on immigration in recent