Have you ever wondered what would happen if you were to take out a new piece of equipment just to replace with one that is already old. Fortunately, there comes a time when this occurs. I am talking about “Replicating the Old in the New”. In this report, you will be given some cause and effects on the implementation issues, how misinformation can lead to internal sabotage, and what the outcome and lessons of what not to do. First, we will commence with the implementation issues of attempting to replicate the old in the new.
According to Steve Copley, IGCSE ICT, there are many ways that you an implement an old system with the new ones. One is by a direct changeover where you are able to simply switch off the old computer system and begin the new one. This means you are able to minimize the down time and you will start using the new system right away. But on the other hand, if you do start the new system and it does not work properly, or you are not able to use the backup data from the old system, all your data could be lost. Not only this, your staff will have not time to use the new system before projects or deadlines are due. Not only is it hard on your employees, it is extremely hard to revert back to the old system if you new one fails.
Another way to implement a new system, says Steve Copley, is to start the new system while you are still using the old system. This is called a parallel implementation. The advantages of having a parallel implementation is that you can use the old system to keep the old system as a back up to the new, but a disadvantage is that you will have to enter he information in the computer twice. This could be very time intensive and consume a lot of effort.
Reading from Fred Dews, Affordable Care ...
... middle of paper ...
...gcseict.info/theory/8/implem/ https://www.google.com/#q=disadvantages+of+direct+changeover http://www.informationweek.com/security/vulnerabilities-and-threats/internal-sabotage-security-risks-rising/d/d-id/1090550? http://billmoyers.com/2013/09/26/some-people-are-making-big-bucks-sabotaging-obamacare/ http://books.google.com/books?id=cWsLAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA152&lpg=PA152&dq=how+misinformation+can+lead+to+successful+internal+sabotage&source=bl&ots=HrLQ45I9zI&sig=4n51RVOG7ilWW4_aJfaB0Q4-DnI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=AaDxUvj5BOnjsATx74DoBg&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=how%20misinformation%20can%20lead%20to%20successful%20internal%20sabotage&f=false http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/info-management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225702436. http://www.crmsearch.com/data-conversion.php
http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/avoid-the-same-old-mistakes-by-focussing-on-lessons-learned.html
Providing effective training about ways to use the new technology is essential. Training helps employees perceive that they control the technology rather than being controlled by it. The training should be designed to match workers’ needs, and it should increase the workers’ sense of mastery of the new technology.
This article deals with the topic of how organizations should go about implementing new technology systems. The article is built around Murphy's Law that, "Whatever can go wrong, will." When organizations implement new system a lot of know problems cannot be avoided and unforeseen problems arise with even grater frequency. Chew outlines seven points to help launch a new system with greater success since they are essential for long-term survival.
The development (or iteration) of the new system was approved due to successful budgetary results over the previous two years and growth trends expected over the next two years. Additionally, ongoing maintenance on the system as problems began to arise was beginning to negatively influence production performance, and a need to iterate the system to incorporate evolving production goals was identified. The successful budget of the previous years encouraged the approval of replacing the current conversion system with a successor that promises to increase production performance while lowering the fixed costs of salaried programmers needed to maintain it.
...takes to set up information in the system. The level of understanding would improve through partaking or getting involved and henceforth could be adapted easily. All the bits and pieces of the project would rapidly increase or grow as per the workflow process. At the end, the overall CPOE system should be able to compare the manual method with the new electronic system and tell which is best and accurate to use and also tell how much time and money will be saved when using either system. At the end of the project the team should be able to come together and discuss whether or not the project met all of the company’s needs such as if it is reliable, efficient, safe and secure and also does it save time and money. Then, if the system has more advantages than disadvantages and it is worth all of the team’s time and effort it would be best to continue with the project.
Choosing which motherboard to use is important. It also is closely related to what processor is chosen. Because of cost saving factors, the AMD Athlon processor is the best choice. Therefore we can only provide a motherboard compatible with the AMD AthlonXP 1900. For our client, we decided on the motherboard Aopen K77-333. This motherboard is an excellent choice for our client because:
Training employees how to use the system is a significant step in ensuring that the organization realizes its goals. Employees need to master and understand the functionality of the system. It is noted that the training of the employees should be planned accordingly. The resources used in the training have to be identified and set. The professional should be aware of the objective of the training. In this case, ensuring that system runs effectively, as well as ensuring that information is safeguarded. Maintenance of the hardware is not only the responsibility of the information technology team in the organization, but also the employees of the organization. For this reason, all the stakeholders should be involved in ensuring that the system functions, as expected.
Modern day organizations have to constantly change to meet the demands of customers. Workers have to change with the organizations to be able to perform new functions and complete new sophisticated tasks.
While technological innovations can provide increased opportunities for organizations and give them a competitive advantage, not all employees respond well to changes in their everyday workflow. When an organization updates its systems, it can face some resistance from employees, especially when the employees do not feel properly trained and lack the confidence in using the new system. Employees may grow frustrated and become less productive and efficient. In some extreme cases, technology can also replace some of their duties and make their positions obsolete, leaving them out of a job. This ties back to the need for job security. Technology has come a long way in the past 50 years and the types of challenges just mentioned are a lot more common in this day and age than they were before. Therefore, managers need to adapt to this changes in the work environment and find a way to satisfy their employees’ needs while increasing work performance and
a difficult task and requires a lot of experiences and skills. Besides, a big number of legacy programs
Building a computer can be a useful skill in today's world. It allows you to
Even though other systems maybe automated it does not mean that they are easy to use. Users of the systems, administrative may have trouble with managing with the system. For instance they may have problems registering new students, or transferring everyone to the new system.
Provide Concurrency: A single computer can execute single task at a time. Hence when we want to do multiple task execution it is not possible with single computer and it is the requirement to move on Parallel Computing to solved multiple task at the same time.
Computers are very complex and have many different uses. This makes for a very complex system of parts that work together to do what the user wants from the computer. The purpose of this paper is to explain a few main components of the computer. The components covered are going to be system units, Motherboards, Central Processing Units, and Memory. Many people are not familiar with these terms and their meaning. These components are commonly mistaken for one and other.
Keeping up with technology is difficult, tiresome, and firms find it very costly to keep at pace with it. Technology rapidly and constantly keeps on changing. Being at par technologically requires extensive research and strategic analysis of acquiring new innovation. Enforcing new technology requires staff retraining and in some cases making employees redundant.
The central unit is the basic part of the computer and includes all the main computer parts. It is the heart of the computer system. It is responsible for executing, or running the software. The software programs are translated into a series of codes made up of 1s to 0s that the CPU can understand. Every code means a certain operation should take place.