Stratford Caldecott Analysis

766 Words2 Pages

Stratford Caldecott’s “Remembering: Grammar-Mythos-Imagining the Real” is from his book Beauty in the Word, published in 2012. In this chapter, he argues that naming, as the beginning of grammar, is an integral part of our humanity. He goes on to connect grammar to the arts of remembering, tradition, and storytelling, as well as commenting on the danger of becoming too reliant on technology. Caldecott believes that grammar, and thereby Remembering, brings us into a greater community of human thought which transcends time; as a result, ‘Grammar’ is “the remembrance of Being” (Caldecott 59). This, he argues, is why it is so important to teach grammar; losing the art of grammar would mean losing our very humanity. Caldecott holds grammar to be a fundamental part of who we are. He argues that the very first task given to man by God was that of naming; this is significant because names are the very cornerstone of grammar. Naming, through grammar, allows us to define and understand the world around us. This is why we can name neither God nor ourselves - we can only name that which we …show more content…

To evidence this, he uses Adam – the first name-giver. Adam’s role has been passed on to all of humanity; we are called to connect our world to the Divine, to connect “the Ideas in God and the things in the world” (Caldecott 41). Caldecott uses this comparison between our mission and Adam’s mission to great effect, underscoring his argument that naming (and thereby grammar) is core to who we are. Names, he argues, are so precious, so important, that we cannot even name ourselves. As counter-intuitive as this may see at first, one soon realizes that naming is equivalent to knowing; we can never truly know ourselves. One can then infer that grammar is simply an expansion of this knowledge; grammar allows us to connect names in such a way that we can better understand and know

Open Document