More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of religion on politics
Political decisions influenced by religion in America
Political decisions influenced by religion in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of religion on politics
KL> In fact, God allows even corrupt governments to exist (for a time) and uses them as instruments of judgment.
KH> Take your pick. The Apostle Paul's teaching is that any government, corrupt or not, is allowed to exist by God and is used by God for his good purposes.
KL> It's presumptuous to give specific examples because God is "behind the scenes" as such, accomplishing his plans via the existence and perhaps overthrow of governments.
KH> Again, take your pick among any government in history which has met it's demise.
JQ> Keven its not my responsibility to defend your argument. If you make the claim God overthrows a specific government you need to cite specific examples. The very fact you make this claim only suggests you have the evidence already in hand. But then again why kind of criteria would you use? What would be your methodology to identify what caused a nation's government to fail? If you don't have a set method of evaluating why nations / governments fail or collapse, then all you would have to say "God did it" without offering any proof. Which you hav...
... looking for a government which can devote God in coordination with the dictates of their own morality.
On top of the failure of the government, we also see the failure to act correctly in humans as well. For example, in World War Z, there were illegal organ trafficking actions being taken in China. These actions were carried out by Fernando Oliveira, a heart surgeon in China. Although his actions were selfish and unjust, one could trace the problem back to the government for not warning the public about the beginning of a plague. Dr. Oliveira saw no true harm in the human trafficking business as it was such a profit. This lead to the demise of the population when the disease was transported through the heart of an infected man. Once the doctors completed the heart t...
We hear about the murders, assaults, robberies, natural disasters and all other evil or natural destructive events in the world, we have to ask the question, how could God let such bad things happen to good people or to let these disastrous events happen at all. Now think about the world and its population if evil or natural disasters did not exist; the world population would be unimaginable. Natural disasters are beyond human control, but murders, assaults, robberies and all other evil or bad deeds committed by human beings is a matter of exercising bad choice or misuse of free will.
...s Germany’s time to be a world leader. On the contrary England believed that it was in the world’s best interests if it remained a world power. Both countries are very power hungry and manipulating words to best fit their interests not the wellbeing of other countries. Due to nationalism, countries see other countries as threats. An arms race begins and alliances are formed. So when one thing is added to another, a war explodes and the whole world is involved. Now as a Christian I am not trying to say that God isn’t in control, on the contrary, I find it hard to believe that God would take a step back and allow war to erupt among his entire creation. I believe, through past examples, that it seems more likely that man’s selfish, sinful nature caused preconditions to build up that finally enough was enough and the world found itself submerged in conflict.
Theocracy is a control with no separation between religion and state. Divine law regulates all aspects of individual relationships (Perry, 206). Under correct circumstances, theocracy could be the most superior form of government. However, in a world filled with sin, this form quickly collapses under man’s control. Only when God truly rules is a theocracy tolerable (Rev. 21:3).
Spoiler Alert: “We are the people that make sure things happen according to plan.” Is it outside the realm of likelihood to assume that free will is not ‘free’ at all? The Adjustment Bureau, a 2011 film starring Matt Damon and Emily Blunt, strikes this inquiry head-on to produce an exceedingly metaphorical understanding of Open Theistic theories. In addition, the film manages to portray a fresh take on divine intervention’s role in God’s blueprint for humanity. The picture’s director, George Nolfi, modernizes the story by putting it in terms of an ill-starred romance of an up-and-coming politician and contemporary ballet dancer who, upon meeting, alter each other’s priorities immensely. In line with the modernized plot, Case Workers at the Adjustment Bureau, those who make sure that all goes according to plan, are a loose representation of Angels. The one put in control of humankind’s complete destiny is called the “Chairman”, although we come to recognize him/her to be a God-like figure. The apex of the plot zeroes in on the idea that a deity, or Chairman, has some predetermined strategy for all of mankind, as we are incompetent of making mature judgments for ourselves. The film offers a variation of leitmotifs from that of freedom versus chance, to love conquering all, and even the outlandish assertion that God is simply a ruthless playmaker in the game of life, though that is to be interpreted with a grain of salt. A generalized Christian understanding of freedom and love in the framework of God both support and condemn the claims portrayed in The Adjustment Bureau. Provided is a link of the trailer to help supplement the sparse explanation given: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJ0TP4nTaE.
The Catholic Catechism instructs the faithful that good government has two duties, both of which must be carried out and neither of which can be ignored.
If that is the realm that the government controls, then what authority should the church practice over people? The answer is none over unbelievers (for that is God’s position to judge), but we are to hold those within the church accountable to God’s Word (1 Cor. 5:9-12). After all, will we not one day experience the perfect unity of religion and government in Christ’s perfect Kingdom? Stead aptly sums up what can bring about a true change in a society and a nation as he says “Believers need to be reminded that there can be no healthy or lasting change of social structures without a redemptive change in people, which is why Christ came two thousand years ago.” (52)
The government can be the root of all evil. In the novel “1984” by George Orwell, the government was indeed the root of all evil for the nation of Oceania. The government led a Revolution that ultimately took over humankind. Taking over humankind was easy for them to do. First, the government realized the weaknesses and strengths within the nation, such as, the hierarchy of social classes. Then, the government realized that society could be controlled by using fear to manipulate the nation into giving up control. Finally, the government realized that if they were to rewrite the past they could dehumanize humankind and make them not think for themselves. Therefore, the governing body in 1984 uses the separation of classes, fear, and the rewriting of the past to control and dehumanize humankind.
This idea is also portrayed in the story of Noah. The Lord God has seen that his beautiful creation has been corrupted, and decides that he will destroy all living things on Earth. However, God spares Noah and all of Noah’s descendants because, “Noah found this favor with the Lord” (Genesis 6:8). The Bible describes how Noah sought the approval of God. In the story it says he was, “a good man and blameless in that age, for he walked with God” (Genesis 6:9-10). God concludes to save Noah because he obeyed Him and became what God wanted him to be, without ever relinquishing his own convictions and personal identity.
Common misconceptions about God run rampant. Some believe He sins just as humans do. Others believe he craves the destruction of mankind. However, in reality, a righteous God exists, a Lord who tests His subjects' faith, a Ruler who controls all. People often contest that God holds no power over the earth. However, God's sovereignty remains evident in that countries fall when He decides to disestablish them. The fact that He disciplines the profane and prospers the deserving displays His uprightness. Though afflictions will come, people must persevere and continue to look towards God. Even though life appears hopeless at times, God remains all-powerful. His love for His followers remains everlasting. His control over the earth endures forever.
The monstrous nature of government is evident to the everyday citizen. It is monstrous to oppress the poor and minorities and it is certainly monstrous to declare war on another country and inflict pain and suffering on its people. Yet it is also obvious to the every day citizen that government is necessary to preserve order. Without law or law enforcement, criminals would roam the streets and wreak havoc. Without a military, other countries would invade us violently. Thus, government is a monstrous institution that preserves order in a potentially horrific manner.
The saying that “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” seems to fit some accounts of the Catholic Church in Latin America. Far away from the authority and watchful eye of the Vatican, atrocities in the name of the Church had taken place. Though I believe it was not the norm but the exception.
The stability of the state is based upon the foundation of the government. Shaky foundations lead to short-lived or miserable nations. Governments based upon religion, birthrights, or one man generally do not have solid foundations. The greatest foundation a government can have is the support of its citizens. Governments which cater to their citizen’s will and needs receive their support. This is the basis of the social contract. When a population feels that their needs are being met, they feel they must honor their social contract. Honoring this contract may be paying taxes, supporting the military, voting, performing community service, or anything the government requires of its citizen. The opposite is true for when the government fails to meet these needs. Historically, in the absence of a stable government, citizens initially begin to stop supporting the government, start calling for a new government, and eventually revolt. A current example of this is the ongoing situation in Libya. Because the current government there, headed by Muammar Gaddafi, has placed the welfare and will of its citizens below that of the politicians that run the country, unrest amongst the citizens has paved the way to calls for democracy, a type of government in which the people are given a voice. Since these calls have gone unanswered, the situati...
My definition of religion has mostly stayed the same, but my perception of it has changed. At the beginning of the class, I assumed religion was something you believed based on your moral principles. I now believe that those moral principles are based on the religion that you believe in. Your religion changes your perception of the world and how to go about in it. Your religion tells you what is right and wrong in the world and answers all of the big questions one asks. Religion according to our book is, “A pattern of beliefs and practices that expresses and enacts what a community regards as sacred and/or ultimate about life” (Van Voorst 6). That definition was one thing that really got me thinking about my own personal idea of what religion