Religious Prosecution

1126 Words5 Pages
All throughout the seventeenth-century, there was a continuous influx of religious individuals into North America. This inflow of settlers was primarily the result of the persecution of their denominations in their home by the established churches. The region with the most persecuted settlers was Massachusetts, which was to become the new residence of the Puritans. These ascetic folks based their theology on different grounds, praising simplicity in a very difficult way. Their views are dark, not as in the color black, but as inflexibility by all means, restraint. Their severity is depicted in their way of thinking, proceeding, and even in their decision “to deny any other sect its freedom.”(Miller, 5) Puritans, as the name correctly clarifies their intentions to purify their new home from the corruption brought by wrong ways and deceitful ideas, which contradicted theirs. Therefore, there is only one method of attaining this position. Unfortunately, they must force all the divergent beliefs to follow the supposedly righteous path by erasing their cultures, there upon accommodating to a new religion against their will, only if they are to stay in puritan towns. But again there is nothing more than the puritan establishments and the unknown wilderness. Enforcing this new set of laws which apparently are very similar to those of their persecutors back in England, a stern religious devotion ought to be implemented. As a result truth will be erroneously appraised. Upon this institution ascends the masterpiece by Arthur Miller, The Crucible. In the marvelous pamphlet, the unavoidable religious austerity of the time is clearly depicted, as Miller is proving “an argument in favour of moral flexibility.”(Miller Budick, 537) This religious misapprehension steers humanity in the town of Salem to an entire misperception of truth, as it wrongfully incriminates innocent human beings. The court and their heretic foolishness stubbornly proceed with these enforcing the false instead of the true.

In the first act of the play, the incident that occurred in the forest is introduced as well as the mysterious illness of Betty. A well known minister is immediately called upon this severe complication. His name is John Hale of Beverly and he has come to unravel this obscure matter. Hale strongly believes that “they cannot look to superstition in this.”(Miller, 38) To him the De...

... middle of paper ...

...e courtroom and bravely die just so that the following generations can learn from this unjust cruelty. John Proctor exemplifies the total opposite of religious austerity, therefore he does achieve the correct interpretation of truth.
The Crucible, to conclude, is a perfect example of how lack of flexibility is noticed in the absolutism of the Puritan elders. Over the course of the trials, the moral rigidity protruded from the judges’ souls, only to be seen by those willing to open up their hearts to defy this cruelty. In an attempt to moralize Salem and to discard any social disturbances, sinful institutions overwhelmed sanctity. The Puritans have purified their towns from every possible Anglican perspective, yet they have accomplished nothing since the power was placed in the corrupt hands. The religious absolutism that flourished during the oblivious aspects of these trials, clearly intensifies the importance of moral flexibility, of truthfulness. Truth, only to be clear in souls of those who deliberately accepted it, “thus to point the direction to correcting our moral optics.”(Miller Budick, 537) As for the others, a disgraceful misperception due to their religious austerity.
Open Document