Religion And Science : The Scarlet Letter

1374 Words3 Pages

As said by Yale professor of psychology and cognitive science, "Religion and science will always clash." Science and religion are both avenues to explain how life came into existence. However, science uses evidence collected by people to explain the phenomenon while religion is usually based off a belief in a greater power which is responsible for the creation of life. The characters Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth in Nathaniel Hawthorne 's novel, The Scarlet Letter, represent religion and science, respectively, compared to the real world debate between science and religion. Roger Chillingworth is a physician who is associated with science. (ch. 9; page 107) "...made [Roger Chillingworth] extensively acquainted with the medical science of the day... Skillful men, of the medical and chirurgical profession, were of rare occurrence in the colony...They seldom... partook of the religious zeal that brought other emigrants across the Atlantic." The people of the Puritan community traveled across the Atlantic for religious reasons, and because men affiliated with medical science did not tend to practice religion, they rarely inhabited this community. Chillingworth, falling under the category of "skillful men of the medical and chirurgical profession," would not be expected to reside in this community. The narrator through emphasizes this with his rhetorical questioning, "Why, with such a rank in the learned world, had he come hither? What could he, whose sphere was in great cities, be seeking in the wilderness?" These questions demonstrate that it was so strange for Chillingworth to appear in this community because of his association with science. Perhaps, the phrase "with such rank in the learned world" could yield the narra...

... middle of paper ...

...wonderfully the community thought of Chillingworth and his skills. Therefore the Puritans, are similar to the Americans in the science vs. religion debate because the occupy the middle ground by supporting both Dimmesdale and Chillingworth. Essentially, the occupations, beliefs, and power imbalance between the two make them comparable to the modern science vs. religion debate.
In sum, Nathaniel Hawthorne, in The Scarlet Letter, contrasts science and religion is using Roger Chillingworth and Arthur Dimmesdale and this compares to the contrast between science and religion in the real world debate. Additionally, other characters such as the Puritan community holding a neutral territory in the debate, have a place in the dispute. Aspects of Dimmesdale, Chillingworth apply to the modern day arguments for science and religion and reveal a deeper meaning to their characters.

Open Document