Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology's negative effect on interpersonal communication
Effect of social media on employee performance
Importance of interpersonal relationships in a workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction: Thoughts from the Breakroom The coffee has gotten cold, the soggy sandwich you brought for lunch is suddenly unappealing, and the conversation has run stale. The clock could not possibly be moving any slower. Your cubicle buddy is busy working on his customer reports, your boss is locked away in his office, and the creepy dude that sits that stares at you from his desk so happens to be taking his lunch break at the same time as you. Relationships in the workplace are a struggle because some of them act as positive motivators such as your favorite co-worker or maybe the nice desk manager who is always willing to greet you with a smile and hello in the morning. However, others such as the creepy dude who stares, the employee who …show more content…
The workplace is one of the various places where this theory can come into play. This paper will explore the external dialectics such as inclusion and seclusion, as well as conventionality and uniqueness of an office and the employees within it. Furthermore, internal dialectics such as connection and autonomy, and impartiality and favoritism will be examined for the close personal relationships of co-workers with their colleagues. Each of these specifics dialectical tensions play a role in how people communicate and collaborate in an office setting. Specifically looking at friendship and romantic relationships in the show The Office these tensions will be explored and compared to real life scenarios, along with the role of technology in the modern …show more content…
As previously mentioned Relational Dialectics looks at dialectical tensions. There are two different categories of dialectical tensions. Internal dialectics simply means the ongoing tension within a relationship versus external dialectics, which means the tensions between a couple and a community (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks, 2015). Often times, these scholars pick a particular focus to analyze such as workplace, college, social media, or other types of settings and platforms where relationships are built and nurtured. In the article Relationships as dialogues Baxter (2004) says, “In being open to another person, one is willing to listen to him or her from that person’s perspective to display the receptivity to what the person has to say to be open to change in one’s own beliefs and attitudes” (p. 5-6). Meaning that when communicating with others an individual is willing to consider others opinions and in the workplace this can be seen happening effectively and ineffectively during team related assignments. External dialectics play a role in how businesses have to think of themselves outside of just their company they have to look at their relationship with the community. In regards to this Baxter (2004) states, “Relationship parties are also involved in ongoing negotiation with outsiders on the ways in which the relationship’s
Relational Dialectics concerns itself with trying to explain the intricacies of close interpersonal relationships such as those with a lover, close friend, or family. Written by two women, Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery, it comes across a little more "touchy-feely" than other theories. This Humanist quality in the way it iw presented allows myself to critique Relational Dialectics in the following fashion. According to Griffin, there are five standards that are reliable to the critique of Humanist theories, and they are: New understanding of people; clarification of values; aestetic appeal; community agreement; reform society. Taking a closer look.
There's a lot going on with the captain—we can't forget, on top of being stuck in a lifeboat, he just lost his entire ship to the sea. Since the story is told from the correspondent's perspective, we only get a glimpse at the sheer magnitude of how he has been affected by the sinking of the ship. The narrator describes his voice as being "deep with mourning, and of a quality beyond oration or tears" (1.6). Yep, you heard that right: he's in mourning for his ship. For most of these guys—psychologically, at least—their ordeal starts when they get into the lifeboat, but we have to remember, for the captain, the ship was his responsibility. And now it's sunk. Talk about a heavy load to bear.
Pluralism, on the other hand, states that the usual conflict arising from the different opinions of employees and management is not seen negative. Therefore the theory describes how the different viewpoints should be combined in order to achieve a compromise. (CIPD, 2008, p. 10-11)
The Palestine and Israel conflict has been carrying on for the better part of the last century. This is a conflict that seemingly has no end in sight. Multiple wars between Palestine and Israel have only complicated things for the inhabitants of the land they are fighting over. Due to the second war in 1967, Israel is now in control of the West Bank and the Gaza strip. This is particularly important to the conflict and how the dialectical perspective plays a part of it because these are two areas that many Palestinians call home, leaving them under Israel rule.
Being a nurse and belonging to nursing society is not easy and it requires a lot of hard work and also for individuals to have some outstanding characters in order to be successful. As for me, the thing I find in common with me and nursing is that I’m compassionate, Honest, and have self-confidence; To me those are some key elements one need to have in order to fit in the nursing society and in this essay I will be explaining how those key elements relate me to the nursing society.
Discussions now turn into debates, where inflexible standpoints collide. The growing mistrust creates a sense of insecurity and loss of control. Efforts to control the counterpart belong to later escalation stages.
In the chapter Welcome to Turm-Oil Inc, the writer has presented a factious company to show how conflicts rises among go-workers even in those workplaces in employees consider themselves a family. Due to changing millennium company is facing downsizing which provides every room for conflict to occur. The writer has mentioned different employees of the company. Clyde S.Dale, General Manager has been in the company for 22 years. He ignores his problems until they boil over, at which time he takes charge and straighten things out. Vic Tom, Salesman thinks customer are easy to deal with but co-workers are not and are often found on the golf course and consider it a networking. Perry Noyd, Controller has seen in company for 22 years, life has taught him that everything is not as good as it appears and he often raises the ‘devils advocate’ point of view during meetings. He seems himself a realist and is patient about gardening. Dough Right, Manager of Distribution and thinks that everything run so better if people would do things his way. He was brought into company two years ago to shape up the distribution ...
This activity is to understand how our conflict style can impact our relationships and to reflect on how we can improve our relationships by managing these conflicts. “Friend ship is a voluntary relationship that provides social support” (Adler, Rosenfeld & Proctor II, 2012, p. 384). Friendships we create, are managed and maintained through communication. Our level of communication depends on the level and depth of the friendship. There are different types of friendships, some last for short period, some last for years or life time. All friendships are not created equal. Gender of the friend plays a significant role in communication.
Work Effectively with Others Working relationships can be fragile- especially in the workplace where they are often built and destroyed by the actions we take. Building healthy, secure and harmonious relationships is important not only to us personally, but also to underpin the success of the organisation we work for. We need to build effective relationships for a number of reasons: The health of people depends on what happens in organisations and what they do. Overwork, stress, being subjected to harassment or bullying all impact on a person's health and therefore on their ability to fulfil their role within the organisation.
Dealing with conflict may enable the development and maintenance of satisfactory level in a relationship. ( Canary & Cupach, 1988) According to Brehm, Miller, Perlman & Campbell (2002), conflicts are common in most close relationships. Whether conflict assist in intimacy or distress depend on individual differences in the way they interpret and respond to the conflict. Different responses to conflict depends on different
To begin with, Relational dialectics theory is a relational correspondence hypothesis which clarifies correspondence designs that emerge between
Relational Dialectics is defined as “ a dynamic knot of contradictions in personal relationships; a ceaseless interplay between contradictory or opposing tendencies” (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks 137) such as integration-separation, stability-change, and expression-non expression. Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery coined the phrase “opposites attract” to make it simple in understanding Relational Dialectics. This theory is rooted in phenomenological tradition.The theory utilizes an interpretive approach.
The pattern of work over the years seems to change from one era to another. With the advent of ever-growing technologies and innovation, the workforce environment and nature is moving from the traditional ways of working, thus creating a drastic change and a new revolution in it. This paper presents a critical reflection on how the nature of the workplace has been changing over the past years. The work life today completely contrasts with that of the past. The norms and dedication towards a company have moved on and work people are now distributed in multiple companies.
Conflict is a natural part of human interaction and occurs as a result of our individualistic nature (Porter-O-Grady & Malloch, 2015). Relationship-based conflicts are a a sub-type of interest-based conflicts and are common in any environment where two or more persons interact. In relationship-based conflicts, personality differences make communication and interaction challenging which result in frequent misunderstandings (Porter-O’ Grady & Malloch, 2015). Emotional tension creates a breading ground for altercations between parties which can lead to an endless cycle of animosity and hurt feelings (Porter-O’ Grady & Malloch, 2015). When ignored, the situation results in crippiling polarization between parties that ultimately effects the productivity
With these freedoms you have choices to make. You can either continue blindly merely surviving or choose to see the workplace in a different light. By seeing everything in a different way, you are now free of everything that is fundamentally meaningless. The book is also useful in facilitating the reader’s ability to change their perceptions of normally negative aspects of life.