Reconstruction of Fish Passages

1793 Words4 Pages

Introduction
The assignment of this study is to understand the fish passage failure, to give informed information to design or manage operational changes that can increase fish pass efficiency and the sustainability of fish species. Mechanisms of fish pass failure, such as structure, environment and behavior factors can be a detriment in aiding passage structures as well as a benefit. Without the reconstruction of a fish pass, the juvenile elves become isolation in turn imposes elves’ distinction. It is therefore very important that the objective in re constructing a fish pass is clear, of the aquatic changes being made, to the enhancement of elves migration, produce sustainability. This can include to policy makers and efficiency cost to perform criteria for ranking severity to priorities fish passage, therefore prioritizing the re constructing of a fish passage structure, in allowance to enable fish to pass barriers that reflect obstacles.
Method
The study conducted a literature search for peer reviewed articles pertaining directly to evaluation of the fish passage. The review articles included, re construction of the fish passage, prioritizing the severity of fish passage remodeling and reconstruction, and preventing the extinction of fish species. The student reviewed four studies based on the sustainability of juvenile elves and the reconstruction.
The definition of a fish pass is also known as a dyke, waterway, cannel, dam, a fish passage in which the juvenile eels, fish, water species pass through, to travel up stream, or downstream.
Results
The four case studies that were reviewed in analysis the fish passage are as follows:
The first article titled “Enhancing immigration and recruitment of eels; the use of...

... middle of paper ...

...studies need to be made.

Works Cited

Bunt, C. M. (2001). Fishway entrance modifications enhance fish attraction. Fisheries Management & Ecology, 8(2), 95-105. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2400.2001.00238.x

Kemp, P. S., & O'Hanley, J. R. (2010). Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. Fisheries Management & Ecology, 17(4), 297-322. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x

Knights, B., & Whites, E. (1998). Enhancing immigration and recruitment of eels; the use of passes and association trapping systems. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 5, 459-471.

Prato, E. E., Comoglio, C. C., & Calles, O. O. (2011). A simple management tool for planning the restoration of river longitudinal connectivity at watershed level: priority indices for fish passes. Journal Of Applied Ichthyology, 2773-79. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01856.x

More about Reconstruction of Fish Passages

Open Document