Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Westward expansion in the 1800s
Westward expansion in the 1800s
Westward expansion in the 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Westward expansion in the 1800s
During the 19th century, westward expansion was becoming a possibility for the North and South regions of the United States. The North and South’s economy relied on two completely different industries: manufacturing and agriculture. Their work force was made up of two different people groups: immigrants and slaves. Both regions wanted to expand westward for different reasons. The South wanted to expand their economic power west. Northerners feared the expansion of southern agriculture west would bring more slave states. However, neither side knew whether or not slavery would be allowed in the western territories. As events like the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854, and “Bleeding Kansas” and John Brown’s raid took place, …show more content…
The North dominated the manufacturing industry and the South dominated the agricultural industry. The North contained half of the “manufacturing establishments in the country in 1860” and “produced more than two-thirds of the manufactured goods.” The South had “cotton production [booming] in the lower South” and “cotton constituted nearly two-thirds of the total export of trade in the United States.” The amount of labor required to keep up with southern agriculture would require a continuous workforce. The North had a continuous cheap workforce themselves: immigrants. About 2.5 million immigrants from Europe came to America in the 1850s. Because “few immigrants settled in the South,” the South didn’t have a continuous workforce. The South had to depend on slaves for their workforce. Even though the South had a great advantage of agricultural economic control, they had to depend greatly on the North for manufacturing because of their poor transportation. When the option of westward expansion came to be, the South could see it as an opportunity to expand their agricultural economy to make up for their dependence on northern manufacturing. However, the North realized the danger of the South wanting to expand westward. The South’s economic power could grow and with their agriculture, would also come their slaves, but would slavery be allowed …show more content…
Both regions wanted to try and gain another state, so both sides took to create a government within the territory. Pro-slavery southern settlers held an election that legalized slavery, but anti-slavery northern settlers wouldn’t have it and held their own election, abolishing slavery and then petitioned for statehood. However, they were denied statehood by Congress and were seen as traitors. Federal marshals were sent to arrest them, but they fought back causing both sides to fire at each other. This event was known as “Bleeding Kansas” and showed that either side was willing to kill and die for their cause. This awakened the eyes of Americans and showed the true separation of the North and South. There was no going back. These two regions were no longer fighting for the preservation of the United States, they were fighting to tear their own people apart. There was a clear distinction between the goals of the North and the goals of the South. They did not want to work together. They only wanted political domination for their
Throughout most of the nineteenth century, the United States expanded its territory westward through purchase and annexation. At the end of the century, however, expansion became imperialism, as America acquired several territories overseas. This policy shift from expansionism to imperialism came about as a result of American's experience in the Spanish American War and the Congressional debates that followed the American victory.
...l, cultural and financial institutions led to fierce reactions. Bloody Kansas, Sumner’s caning, and Brown’s raid all happened because Northerners and Southerners felt that opposing faction was encroaching on their beliefs. Northerners felt that the Kansas- Nebraska Act would lead to slavery being extended to Northern states. Southerners felt that Northerners (abolitionists and republicans) would try to abolish slavery and destroy their livelihood. The age of compromise ended when the Kansas- Nebraska act was introduced because it made past compromises void. If previous compromises could be void then compromises were no longer useful to the Union and chaos and violence took its place. The increasing violence that plague sectional tension during the 1850s closed off all hope for compromise by the end of the decade and led to the bloodiest war in the country’s history.
As the North was going through many economic changes and continued to advance in other issues as well the South became stagnant. The North developed factors and made major advancements in the textile industry; new jobs were created and women began to take a more active role in society. Where as the South stayed mostly the same. Besides a few inventions such as the cotton gin, slavery still dominated the South and women had very little to almost no say in any aspect of life. The difference in economy’s brought about great amounts of tension between the North and the South, and because of territorial expansion there was a significant amount of controversy over whether slavery would be legal in this new territory or
Secondly, the demand for cotton grew tremendously as cotton became an important raw material for the then developing cotton industries in the North and Britain. The growing of cotton revived the Southern economy and the plantations spread across the south, and by 1850 the southern U.S produced more than 80% of cotton all over the world. As this cotton based economy of the south grew so did the slave labor to work in these large scale plantations since they were more labor-intensive...
How do you see progress, as a process that is beneficial or in contrast, that it´s a hurtful process that everyone at one point of their lives has to pass through it? At the time, progress was beneficial for the United States, but those benefits came with a cost, such cost that instead of advancements and developments being advantageous factors for humanity, it also became a harmful process in which numerous people were affected in many facets of life. This all means that progress is awsome to achieve, but when achieved, people have to realize the process they had to do to achieve it, which was stepping on other people to get there.
The North and South were forming completely different economies, and therefore completely different geographies, from one another during the period of the Industrial Revolution and right before the Civil War. The North’s economy was based mainly upon industrialization from the formation of the American System, which was producing large quantities of goods in factories. The North was becoming much more urbanized due to factories being located in cities, near the major railroad systems for transportation of the goods, along with the movement of large groups of factory workers to the cities to be closer to their jobs. With the North’s increased rate of job opportunities, many different people of different ethnic groups and classes ended up working together. This ignited the demise of the North’s social order. The South was not as rapidly urbanizing as the North, and therefore social order was still in existence; the South’s economy was based upon the production of cotton after Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin. Large cotton plantations’ production made up the bulk of America’s...
America was expanding at such a rapid pace that those who were in America before us had no time to anticipate what was happening. This change in lifestyle affected not only Americans but everyone who lived in the land. Changing traditions, the get rich quick idea and other things were the leading causes of westward expansion. But whatever happened to those who were caught in the middle, those who were here before us?
...h and the South wanted the territory for themselves. The North wanted to expand its industrial fingers to better their economy, but the South wanted more land for plantations to also better their economy. First, the Wilmot Proviso established popular sovereignty as the new factor that decided what side was going to obtain the land. This angered the South because they were frightened that their voice would be lost, and subsequently slavery would be demolished. However, the North felt anger after Stephen Douglass proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and allowed any white male settler to decide if the new territory would be slave or free. With Southern white men trying to make the territories slave territories, the North were furious and started bleeding Kansas, which arguably was the spark that ignited the Civil War.
There were many people responsible for the westward expansion of the US. Meriwether Lewis and William Clark were one of the first Americans to precisely explore and map the western Territories. During their expeditions they were aided by a Shoshone woman named Sacagawea and her French-Canadian husband Toussaint Charbonneau, during which they served as translators. Their expedition helped path a way for thousands of settlers to move west.
The South exploited slavery to maintain its culture and to grow cotton on plantations. In comparison, the North thrived during the Industrial revolution, and they became the heart of industry in the U.S. The North developed into a major metropolis due to the inflow of immigrants. Therefore, with willing and cheap workforce, the North did not require slaves. With the purchase of the Louisiana territory,
Those who were against the expansion feared that it would heighten the slavery issue and threaten the Union. Mainly, the North was known for its anti-slavery movements and chose not to cooperate until slavery was finished. However, the South encouraged the practice of slavery by stating that it was a “white southerners” source of a labor force. Nevertheless, on the upside of...
During the period between 1815 and 1861 the political issues that occurred within the states caused separation and Unity at the same time. With the mass movement of people out west into Texas and California many of the disputes occurred because of slavery. The southern states wanted the new states to be slave states, while the northern states believed they should be free states. This argument continued to rage until 1850, when Henry Clay formed the Compromise of 1850. The compromise essentially decided that the disputed land of New Mexico was not part of Texas, and that California was not to be split into a slave and free state, it was to remain as just a free state. With this new compromise, and the Missouri Compromise that split the slave and free states at the 35th Parallel, the nation was split down the middle, creating two distinct sides of the country. This set the stage for the two sides of the Civil war. However the expansion west also created some unity between the states. For the most part, both the northern and southern states wanted to expand the United States boundaries to the Pacific Ocean. This led both sides to support the Mexican war and to accept the annexation of Texas. Westward expansion caused both ...
The North is characterized as a cold rocky place, largely unsuitable for the farming lifestyle. Whereas the South had huge swaths of farmable land and a warm climate. These realities led to vastly different economies. The framework of the North’s economy being factories and the South’s stemming from manual labor. As the North modernized itself, through the building of railroads and automation of factories, its Southern counterpart remained stagnant as the result of an agrarian economy driven by slave labor. With these immutable environments forcing the North to industrialize and the South to farm, a division was created. The division was the need for slaves. A place built around factories is not in such dire need for free labor as the huge farms of the South are. The South lost the second they decided to continue on the abominable path of slavery while refusing the alternate option of industry. Physical realities soon transformed into political ones and the game of prolonging the Armageddon of our country
The Southern and Northern states varied on many issues, which eventually led them to the Civil War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than slavery for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many: utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian resistance (Norton 234). America was a divided land in need reform with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main cash crop and many Southerners knew that heavy reliance on slave labor would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were not heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.
In the years 1800-1850 the North and South of the United States were very different but they clashed head on as people expanded west. As people from both sides of the US moved Westward they took there beliefs, traditions and attitudes with them. Due to the West being nearly empty it was a blank slate for the people moving there to paint with their own beliefs, economies and ways of life. However this was not easy, because there was such a deep riff in the lives of people from clashing sides of the US. Both the North and South of the Early United States had different economies, social structures, ways of life and ideas on the issue of Slavery.