Reanalyze the Relationship of the West and Islamic Civilization Future
1154 Words5 Pages
Samuel P. Huntington thesis has been in center of debates for many years. Moreover, his prediction that main conflicts in near future is between the West (the United States and allies) versus Islamic Civilization has triggered controversy among International Relations scholars. This paper tries to analyze three main supportive arguments from Huntington thesis in the West v. Islam conflict.
Democracy System v. Islamic Laws
Samuel P. Huntington stated that Muslims unable to accept democracy because of the nature of Islamic law and this situation potentially lead to the virulent clash between the West and Islamic countries. He argued that Islam is the exclusive religion which is not flexible to adopt another political idea. This situation is occurred due to Islam basic system which integrates religion principle to political system. For Muslims, Islam is not only a religion. Koran has a set of rules to guide Muslims in forming a good government. Most of Muslims believe that Koran is the righteous guide because it imposed by God (Allah) himself. In contrary, the democratic system was formed by human and therefore makes democracy less trustable than Koran. However, in the Western perspective, democracy values like human rights, freedom of speech and the separation of religion and country able to support the West future vision; global peace. Thus, spreading democracy is an important agenda for the West. Islamic countries in the Middle East, which is affected by this policy, response this policy as a threat for their traditional belief and counter it by containing the Western influence by all means necessary.
Even though it is impossible for Muslim to separate religion principles and national laws, Samuel P. Huntington’s prediction tha...
... middle of paper ...
...to, J. L. (1998). Chapter 2 : Revival and Reform. Islam and politics (4th ed.). Syracuse, New York : Syracuse University Press.
Armstrong, K. (2000). Islam: a short history (Modern Library ed.). New York: Modern Library.
Carpenter, T. G. (2001, November 16). Terrorist Sponsors: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China. Retrieved May 2, 2014. from http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/terrorist- sponsors-saudi-arabia-pakistan-china
Vukovic, P., & James, L. (2010, February) Potential Iranian hegemony in oil producing Islamic countries: Implications for oil geopolitics. Medjunarodni Problemi,Vol. LXII, 7-36.
Bakar, I. A. (2013, December 5). Islam dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia: Peran Gerakan Sosial Baru dalam Islam.Retrieved May 2, 2014, from http://www.csrc.or.id/berita-264-islam-dan-masa-depan-demokrasi-di-indonesia-peran-gerakan-sosial-baru-dalam-islam.html