Compare And Contrast Reagan And Obama

897 Words2 Pages

Reagan vs Obama Back in 1980, Republican president nominee Ronald Reagan pledged throughout his campaign that it was his goal to “restore the great, confident roar of American progress, growth and optimism”. Restoration, reinvigoration, and reclamation of values believed to be lost by the presidential treachery he was succeeding. Fast forward to 2008, Democratic president nominee Barack Obama did not see a need for restoration, he saw a need for new waves with his slogan “change we can believe in” after the economic destruction by W. Bush. Being such dramatic foils, the two men represent different eras of American politics. The unprecedented election of Obama severed Reagan’s seemingly everlasting legacy, signaling real changes coming to the presidency. The “Reagan Revolution” is remembered as an era of conservatism and economic peace, while Obama’s terms are viewed with mixed emotions. Obama’s impact can definitely be argued, as political information was more readily accessible in his presidency than any other in history; thanks to new technology and social communications, but since time has passed, so can Reagan’s. The use of their presidential powers is what a president is remembered for. Assessing the ranges in their backgrounds, motivations, policy creation and execution, and overall achievements, one can determine …show more content…

Pushing forth a beneficial agenda addressing the issues of their times can be seen necessary and important, and making those decisions on the country’s behalf is the president’s job. Based on the eras of both presidents and their positive impacts that have everlasting effects, neither men subjected an imperial presidency. Faults can be found in almost every successful achievement made by every president in history, and success for another can be found in one’s failure as well. It just depends on who you

Open Document