Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the 9/11 attack
Impact of the September 11
Impact of the September 11
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the 9/11 attack
According to Ratzel a nation had to grow and especially expand in order to establish living borders that could be subjected to changes over time. This in fact goes back to Ratzel’s Organic theory of nation whereas according to him the nation is a living body that grows and has to be subject at changes in order to sustain itself and compete in the international economy. (Anissimov, 2013)
No geographical dimensions are the limit because Ratzel argued that even though there are boundaries; states succeed in enlarging their life space by incorporating the life-space of defeated or underdeveloped, economically and politically. (Foreign Affairs, 2014) This is exactly what Germany did during the period of the wars that tear the world apart, trying to enlarge its territories by subjugating the geographical neighbours.
The geographical dimension is important because it is through this that a country seeking to ally with one another for personal interests including, for example, primary resources or for power etc..After the 9/11 a lot of things changed because the terrorist attack by members of al Qaeda breach every sort of barriers that could possibly exist between nation-states.
The relevance of the United States was much more enhanced, and the presence of America in world politics gained much more importance.
Ratzel during his studies was much more concentrating just on the land power as opposed to the sea and underestimating the impact of air power in geopolitics, the same fundamental impact that in 2001 changed all with the attack at the World trade centre.
One of the scholars who focused on the relevance of the geographical dimension and on how it shapes the international relations among states was Kaplan.
Kaplan in his article, T...
... middle of paper ...
...s Sir Halford Mackinder who was not just a great geographer but the father of modern geography.
He in his article, “The Geographical Pivot of History” set and explained the importance that geography has in shaping international relations.
The famous quote that determines the nature of his ideals is: “Man and not nature initiates, but nature in large measures control” (Kaplan, 2009)
According to Mackinder therefore nature understood as geography is thus relevant because even though men are the ones that initiate wars and conflict is still nature that controls everything.
It’s still nature that regulates the decision of one state to take any action; for example focusing on the issue of the sea and the land power. Men set military installations around all the port of the world because the geographical dimension in which they are living could be dangerous for their own
After the Second World War, America came out of the war with the responsibility of being the “superpower” of the world. In the past America would never get involved in foreign affairs however after World War Two things had changed. Since America was considered the most powerful natio...
...here has been a slow transformation process of the American foreign policy. It moved away from seeing the threat of the "Evil Empire" towards the approach to promote American democracy all over the world.
The study of the geopolitics around the globe and over time is a complex task. Numerous factors influence the causal chain of events that determine the course of a state’s history. Geography in its broadest sense limits the ability of a state to become a superpower, but it also allows certain states to thrive with relative ease compared to lesser developed countries. Location, terrain, technology, and demographics work in conjunction to affect the power of certain states, and it is through the effective use of these elements states attempt to raise or maintain their power. It is the fundamental goal of states to seek relative power over other states and regions, and states will act in ways they believe will maintain or increase their power. However, whiles sometimes states may act irrationally or in ways contrary to their own best interest, ultimately what is fundamental to the actions of a state is the belief that their actions will maintain or increase the state’s power.
What effect did this have on America’s role in the world during the 1920s and 1930s?
The international setting is home to 196 countries and many international organizations in the world today. The number of countries and organizations in the world is a malleable figure that is constantly fluctuating. Over history, we have learned about countries conquering others, colonies forming their own countries, and countries forming their own colonies. Keeping track of the ever-changing states in the international system has been an overwhelming process. To make life simpler, over the past couple hundreds of years, in an effort to organize the states motivations to make bold decisions, we have developed theories to explain the process. These theories are backed with hard evidence and reaffirmation by other scholars over time. The main
Furthermore, Weber also seems to assume a closed state system. As the world began to globalize more in the 20th century, interaction between States was simply unavoidable. For example, the spread of Communism during the Cold War began to blur the lines between Statehood and non-Statehood—some “States” held less power than separate parties within them (invading Communist powers). This discrepancy makes it difficult to distinguish who can be classified as a real State and who cannot, even decades before conflict arose in Syria.
...nt variables. It can deal with the interests within a country and interests out of it. It can occur due to ideological differences or religious differences. It can occur due to a power grab, and in the cases of a failed brinkmanship, can be a complete accident. Each war throughout history has its own unique set of reasoning for occurring, which makes studying the causation of war so fascinating: in every war you study, you are guaranteed to find so many unique characteristics that it possesses.
The chosen level of analysis and international relation theory to explain this event are the individual-level of analysis and realism. This level of analysis focuses on the individuals that make decisions, the impact of human nature, the behavior of individuals acting in an organization, and how personality and individual experiences impact foreign policy...
There's always something new to research in geography: new nation-states are created, natural disasters strike populated areas, the world's climate changes, and the Internet brings millions of people closer together. Knowing where countries and oceans are on a map is important but geography is much more than the answers to trivia questions. Having the ability to geographically analyze allows us to understand the world in which we live.
Geopolitics is defined as the study of the effect geography has on international politics and relations. Following the Yalta Conference and the formal surrender of Germany, the geopolitical relationships amongst nations once controlled by Hitler’s army were up in the air. Would they fall into the hands of the communist force of Stalin’s regime or would they embrace the democratic government sweeping the world thanks to the United States and Western Bloc powers? First of all, Germany was divided in half with the western half being controlled by the allies and the eastern half under the control of the Soviet Union. By 1949, Western Germany would have a democratic government while Eastern Germany became a satellite country of the Soviet Union with a communist government. The Soviet Union would continue the spread of their brand of communist government absorbing the countries of Albani...
Level of analysis discloses three different ways of understanding international relations. The System-level analysis considers "top-down" approach to study world politics (Rourke, 2007, p. 91). It emphasises that international actors, countries, operate in a global social-political-economic-geographic environment and the explicit characteristics of the system outlines the mode of interaction among the actors. The State-level analysis stresses the national states and their domestic practices such as national interests, interest groups, government, and domestic economy as the key determinants of the state of world affairs (Mingst, 2008). The Individual-level of analysis examines human actors on the global stage. It focuses on the human nature, which defines the primary human characteristics that influence decisions; organizational behaviour that describes human interaction within organized settings, e.g. decision-making group; and personal behaviour that investigates the effect of the uniqueness of individual decision makers on foreign policy (Rourke, 2007, p. 65).
India and China however, were landlocked and were by far the greatest industrial powers in the world till the Industrial revolution. Technology, not geography, helped temperate agriculture and industry to zoom ahead. One way a country overcomes geographical isolation is to improve its transportation infrastructure. Better roads, ports, paths, and other modes of transport provide access to world markets. But a country can only derive full benefits from these investments against a backdrop of good trade and macroeconomic policies. Consequently this leads to the belief that people again control the thought of their own geography.
People’s ideas and assumptions about world politics shape and construct the theories that help explain world conflicts and events. These assumptions can be classified into various known theoretical perspectives; the most dominant is political realism. Political realism is the most common theoretical approach when it is in means of foreign policy and international issues. It is known as “realpolitik” and emphasis that the most important actor in global politics is the state, which pursues self-interests, security, and growing power (Ray and Kaarbo 3). Realists generally suggest that interstate cooperation is severely limited by each state’s need to guarantee its own security in a global condition of anarchy. Political realist view international politics as a struggle for power dominated by organized violence, “All history shows that nations active in international politics are continuously preparing for, actively involved in, or recovering from organized violence in the form of war” (Kegley 94). The downside of the political realist perspective is that their emphasis on power and self-interest is their skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states.
..., since it reinforce the perception of the surrounding states to be dealing with a country characterized by a high level of resolution and risk-taking attitude, despite its inability to confront other major power military.
Recent research into regionalism and economic geography suggests that, in addition to an increasing global flow of ideas, capital, goods and labour, geographical proximity between states may also increase their level of cooperation (Tanja, 2011; Kurian and Vinodan, 2013).