preview

Rajiv's Story

analytical Essay
534 words
534 words
bookmark

In this instance the government regulation to keep the school safe is interfering with Rajiv’s fundamental freedom of conscience and religion stated in section 2 of the charter, and it is doing so unjustly. While the information given in the story was scarce, there were no reports of a Kirpan being used a weapon before, any problems with weapons, or any attempt to find an alternative instead of disallowing the Kirpan completely . In the case Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys The Supreme Court of Canada decided that the decision to prohibit the wearing of a Kirpan to be a violation of one’s fundamental freedom. This is important because a precedent has been set by the Supreme Court of Canada. After the Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys case the court decided that if that given the premise a student has not used the Kirpan as a weapon before, and sincerely believes that a metal Kirpan is essential in paying respects to their religion, it is within their rights to wear one. This important as it proves that the government regulation seized Rajiv’s Kir...

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the government regulation to keep the school safe is interfering with rajiv's fundamental freedom of conscience and religion, and it is doing so unjustly.
  • Explains that harvey's freedom of expression is able to be restricted because of the reasonable limits clause. rajiv claimed harvey was "promoting hate through his jokes".
  • Analyzes how the supreme court of canada ruled that a vice-principal's search of 13-year-old boy was not only reasonable, but encouraged.
Continue ReadingCheck Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

  • Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Continue Reading