Racism In Things Fall Apart

1550 Words4 Pages

From an early age, students in the United States learn the rhyme “In fourteen hundred ninety-two Columbus sailed the ocean blue” to memorize the date when the widely celebrated Italian colonizer, Christopher Columbus, landed off the coast of America. However, what the school poem does not mention about Christopher Columbus is that is 1492, after sailing the ocean blue, he committed genocide. After his arrival in their home country, Columbus forced American Indians into slavery and utilized barbaric punishment against them, including amputation, and dismemberment by dogs. In his legacy, disease carried by settlers and warfare with colonialists killed millions of native individuals. Yet, despite Columbus ' crimes, history largely remembers him
A single story is told of American Indian groups that portrays them as “savage” people who, if not for benevolent white colonizers, would have gone bereft of virtue or civilisation. Single stories, like those told about pre-columbian America, are dangerous. When a place is given only a single story, a a perspective becomes a definition and creates incomplete prejudices about many people and many, vastly different, stories. The folly of the single story are not limited to the West, for example, history shows pre-colonial Africa in a solely negative light as an unaccountable, primitive land saved from its inherent darkness by European colonizers In his novel, Things Fall Apart, Achebe challenges history’s single story of Africa by telling the tale of Okonkwo, a strong tribesman living in the the Igbo clan of Umuofia whose complex life and culture are stereotyped and stigmatized by European Colonizers. Throughout Things Fall Apart, the novel disputes the single story of early Africa by representing the complexities and advancements that existed without European influence of an indigenous African group called the Igbo, including the Igbo people’s advanced conversation skills, their ordered justice system and their strong
When the egwugwu, or spirits that act as justices in the clans’ court cases, hear a domestic abuse case between a man and his in-laws, they explain their role in the Umuofian legal system: “We have heard both sides of the case… our duty is not to blame this man or to praise that but to settle this dispute” (93). When the author writes the word “settle”, he illustrates that Umuofia 's justice system is an example of a contradiction to the single story of Africa because it shows that Umuofians possess the ability to self govern, function through disputes nonviolently and mete out justice within their clan. While historydepicts precolonial Africa as violent and full of upheaval, the egwugwu’s desire to “settle” the case indicates they possess civilally minded intentions not possible under the single story of Africa and can effectively handle their clan’s government. In a similar manner, the word “duty” underscores the idea of a complex society in precolonial Africa because it indicates that Umuofians can carry responsibilities. That the Umuofians have a concept of “duty” indicates they can rely upon each other and so can function as a working society with active members. By using the term “both sides” to describe the egwugwu case, Achebe reminds the reader that there is

Open Document