Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
racial profiling of muslims after 9/11
essays about islamophobia in the media
racial profiling of muslims after 9/11
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: racial profiling of muslims after 9/11
TSA would save money if they opted to train personal to racially profile Middle Easterners. They would not need to randomly search old disabled ladies. Security lines be shorter, and screening would require less personal.
Another proposed cause of the racial profiling in U.S. airports is Islamophobia. The Oxford Dictionary defines Islamophobia as the, “Dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.” This irrational fear of Islamic people not only cause discrimination in airports but all over the world. People are Islamophobic because of a multitude of reasons. Professor Scott Appleby of the University of Notre Dame states that misinformation in the media badly displays the minority of extremists who do not
…show more content…
He believes that the media either does this out of ignorance or simply because they set to gain something, politically or financially, for portraying Islam as a violent religion (Appleby). Appleby claims that another cause of anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. is the economy. He concludes that people who feel like they are being displaced conveniently use Muslims as scapegoats (Appleby). He says, “the very threatening, easy target, the Muslim…suddenly becomes the Muslim terrorist who is undermining our way of life, from within” (Appleby). The tensions involved with crises also causes Islamophobia. Appleby points out that events like 9/11, the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan makes people believe that the U.S. is losing their sovereignty and, “their interests are being threatened by outsiders”. A combination of these reason is the formula in making a person Islamophobic. This fear causes people to turn against one another and produces lots of hate. Hate is the fuel in which foolhardy decisions are made on, decisions like supporting presidential candidate, …show more content…
programs, security personal are cheaper to accommodate and are more expendable. Even so, the cost associated with airport security and its personal does not have the biggest effect on the problem of racial profiling. After the crisis of 9/11, “airlines can no longer use independent contractors to supply their security personnel, all of the screeners currently employed in U.S. airports are federal employees” (Kleiner 107). A recent report from the Department of Homeland Security shows that many T.S.A employees have not completed any comprehensive training program and the “T.S.A. cannot ‘show that the program is cost-effective, or reasonably justify the program’s expansion’” (qtd. in Schmidt). Reports in 2011 has revealed that the T.S.A was profiling passengers at airports in Newark and Hawaii (Schmidt). The Times magazine has reported that more than, “30 officers at Logan International Airport in Boston had said that the program was being used to profile passengers like Hispanics traveling to Florida or blacks wearing baseball caps backward,” (Schmidt). Yevgenia Kleiner, a New York City lawyer, states that
In the United States of America today, racial profiling is a deeply troubling national problem. Many people, usually minorities, experience it every day, as they suffer the humiliation of being stopped by police while driving, flying, or even walking for no other reason than their color, religion, or ethnicity. Racial profiling is a law enforcement practice steeped in racial stereotypes and different assumptions about the inclination of African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American or Arab people to commit particular types of crimes. The idea that people stay silent because they live in fear of being judged based on their race, allows racial profiling to live on.
“What time should we leave? Two hours in advance? Three? Four?” Millions of people ask these questions each year before boarding a plane. Between driving, security, walking to the gate, and getting settled, boarding a plane exhausts travelers. But out of all of these different activities, one frustrates and restrains travelers the most: TSA security. People ask why they need all this security, complain about the inconvenience it causes, and ultimately annoys people to no end. Created after 9/11, Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, nationalized airport security, increased screening duration, and supposedly increases security on flights. However, statistics say these added security measures never come to fruition and potentially cost more lives than they save.
After the American tragedy of September 11, 2001, airport security became a heated debate that continues today. America must protect itself from terrorist attacks, but some homeland security methods are better than others. In January of 2010, the Obama administration declared that airport passengers from 14 countries, including Pakistan, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia, would be subjected to rigorous screening before flights into the United States (Schneier). Basically, airport security employees would have the right to discriminate against passengers of Arab descent because of the country they were born in. Attempts to improve airport security through racial profiling are unjust, unwarranted, and completely unnecessary. Innocent passengers do not deserve harassment at airport security simply because of their race. Although supporters of these measures argue that they will greatly reduce the chances of terrorist attacks, not all terrorists are of Arab descent. There are also simple strategies in recruitment that terrorist organizations can take to outmaneuver these airport security measures. Airport security can certainly be improved to protect the country, but racial profiling in airports is not the answer.
Chuck Goodwin explains, “TSA, which stands for Transportation Security Administration, is an agency in the Department of Homeland Security and is responsible for screening all travelers and their luggage, as well as the screening of all air and rail transportation in the US.” Many travelers know of the them for their increased presence in all airports in the U.S and other major American airports worldwide. After the terrorist attack that took place in September 2001, President Bush and his advisors implemented The Patriot Act. Tracey DiLascio explains, “The Patriot Act is complex, but its major provisions act to improve coordination and communication between government intelligence agencies, removing unwieldy and unnecessary legal barriers between different federal offices and allowing vital investigations to proceed with greater ease and efficiency.” Their idea was to ensure that all intelligence agencies would communicate in a way that would keep America safe. “Steps to prevent events of the scale of those that took place at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, began to fall into place almost immediately...The first outline of a proposal for what would eventually become the USA Patriot Act was drafted just days after the attacks.” (DiLascio) Due to past terrorist attacks, the TSA has implemented security measures in the airports they occupy. “Following September 11, 2001, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was created to strengthen the security of the nation’s transportation systems and ensure the freedom of movement for people and commerce.” (TSA website) These measures include full body scanners and pat downs.
One of the foremost not-so-shocking consequences that have unusually become a trend in today’s society as a result of the events of September 11th is the issue of racial profiling. Racial profiling is the unjust method used by certain police officials to gather suspects for a variety of crimes; it is used to target certain individuals based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion (“Racial Profiling”). Citizens and authorities alike have developed an attitude towards people from the Middle East. When a person sees a Middle Eastern male enter a plane before it takes flight, people usually began to feel extreme paranoia. Since we are assuming that the attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001 were both done by the same nationality, citizens have established the mindset that all Middle Eastern individuals are inevitably terrorists. It is true that both masterminds for each of the attacks were of Middle Eastern descent. However, the paranoia is not rational; it is only rooted in an irrational fear birthed out of ignorance. The only conclusion th...
Most people in todays world think profiling people is a good idea, people at airports think that anyone is or looks like a muslim, is a terrorists. Sometimes profiling works and other times profiling does not work and point out terrorists but instead it offends people because they been profiled just because who they are and where they come from. Most people nowadays think that all Muslims are Arabs, but thats not true they are black, white, asian, and all other types of races. Because the numbers of actual terrorists is so low, most of everyone selected by the profile will be innocent, but because of that only certain people from different places will be profiled.
Hessian Abbess’s resentment is shared by many Arab and Arab-American fliers who say racial and ethnic bias is playing a bigger part in who gets pulled aside for questioning and a thorough baggage check by airport security. Complaints like Hassan Abbass's have soared since the September 11 incident prompted stricter airport security nationwide.
Have you ever been followed by store officials or security while shopping in a department store? At first, all of the attention can be flattering but quickly becomes insulting once you realize they’re not following you to offer any assistance. Instead because of how you look you fit a certain profile that causes store officials to think you’ve come to their store to steal. This type of behavior is called racial profiling. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, racial profiling refers to the discrimination practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Citizens need to be more aware of racial profiling and make laws that racial profiling should be illegal. Racial profiling is carried out by law enforcement airport security, and other security personnel that look to profile the minorities for no reason. Heather Sally Newton Driscoll ebscohost.com stated “The practice of profiling is rooted in centuries of discrimination and is based on stereotypes that have long been disproved. Profiling holds on entire population accountable for the committed by a small minority”.
Racial profiling occurs because people are scared. The Department of Transportation’s sub-committee Air Traffic Control could be at fault here as well because three people were detained, which threw off the flight plan, times of landing and departure for other fights and inconvenientince the other passengers on board. The Department of Home Land Security let’s immigrants in without proper back round cheeks, but the department lets good people get treated like dirt like in the airline case here because said persons skin color is suspicious looking. The department has a priority to the American people, but I think they forgot that they have a priority for immigrants as
In the past few years, racial profiling has become a very prominent issue in American society. In “Racial Profiling,” “Racial Profiling is a controversial and illegal discriminatory practice in which individuals are targeted for suspicion of crimes based on their ethnicity, race, or religion rather than on evidence-based suspicious behavior” (Para. 11). Many people are wronged because of this phenomenon and effects many of them in multiple ways. Racial profiling is effecting many people and it needs to be addressed.
They are a reminder of America’s long and deeply ambivalent history with Islam, Arabs, and the Middle East.” (Makdisi 1). Makdisi feels that the fear of Muslims was not always there; stating that Thomas Jefferson read the Quran and was very interested in the religion. Protestant missionaries wanted to save and convert the people that practiced Islam; the missionaries did not fear Muslims or Arabs (Makdisi 1). Makdisi goes on to say that the fear of Muslims did not start until the end of the 20th century mainly because the new wave of Immigration in the 1960’s. Makdisi says, “rather, the stigmatization of Arabs and Muslims occurred principally because of the politics in the Middle East and because of the enormously consequential United States role in the region” (Makdisi 1). Makdisi blames the United States ' involvement and support in Israel and states that the Iranian hostage situation was "similarly a direct response to the United States support for t he Shah of Iran” (Makdisi 1). Makdisi argues that the people of the United States were hurt by the policies our own country had in place. Both Lyre and Makdisi agree that the attacks on September 11th, 2001 only reinforced the stigma that was there and make it easier for the world to view all Muslims, Arabs, and all people from the Middle East in a negative
In this poll, involving telephone interviews from 2,250 adults in America, Gallup(2004) investigated the public opinion on racial profiling with two methods. Gallup (2004) first method of approach was asking the respondents “how widespread they think the practice of racial profiling is when: motorists are stopped on roads and highways, passengers are stopped at airport security checkpoints, and shoppers are questioned in malls and stores about possible theft.” Results showed that a considerable amount of Americans believe racial profiling is widespread in all three circumstances. 53% of respondents think the practice of stopping motorists due to their race or ethnicity is widespread. 49% of respondents think racial profiling is used widely by those attempting to prevent theft in shopping malls and stores, and 42% of respondents think the practice is widespread at security checkpoints in airports. Needless to say, perceptions about the occurrence of racial profiling differ by racial and ethnic group. Blacks and Hispanics generally believe it is more common than whites. For instance, 67% of blacks and 63% of Hispanics felt that racial profiling is widespread in traffic stops compared to the 50% of whites that felt the practice is widespread. Furthermore, blacks at 54% and Hispanics at 48% were nearly just as likely to believe that profiling is widespread in airports compared to the 40% of whites. Moreover, when asked about malls and stores, 65% of blacks and 56% of Hispanics believed the practice is widespread in that context, compared to only 45% of whites. Furthermore, Gallup (2004) second method of approach was asking the respondents “whether they think racial profiling is justified when: motorists are stopped on roads and highways, when passengers are stopped at airport security checkpoints, and when shoppers are questioned in malls and stores about possible theft.” Most of Americans
Islamophobia is a newly coined term that is used to describe the growing fear of Muslims or specific groups that are considered to be associated with Islam. As a new term, the validity of Islamophobia is still a subject of huge debate even as its causes and characteristics are also controversial. This term was coined to refer to the events in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks in light of people’s attitudes towards Muslims and those associated with Islam. Actually, after the dust settled following the attacks, a new gesture of nationalism was witnessed across the United States and racism soon followed, which are usually faces to the same coin (Rose, 2013). In light of these developments on the question on whether Islamophobia is a form of racism has generated arguments and counter-arguments in support and opposition to the claim. People who consider Islamophobia as a form of racism have supported their argument through various reasons including the division and exclusion associated with the fear of Muslims. On the contrary, opponents have argued that Islamophobia is not a form of racism because of lack of a clear link between the term and racism as well as the fact that Islam is not a race but religion. An analysis of these arguments and counter-arguments reveals that Islamophobia is a form of racism, particularly cultural racism.
After 9/11 has induced negative attitudes towards Muslim peoples who tend to be strongly associated with any act of terrorism. The media has played a colossal role in developing such negative association wherein it constantly portrays Muslim people in combination with violent terrorist acts. It does so in a way that they both go hand-and-hand. In other words, it has made it as though the Islamic religion is synonymous with terrorism. The media has perpetuated Muslim stereotypes over the years that followed the 9/11 incident. Because of this, society has developed, and still has developed, this prejudiced mindset about the Islamic religion and the Muslim communities around the world. People immediately assume that any violent act being depicted through the media is the direct result of Muslims. They automatically generate this idea that the act was performed by a Muslim terrorist even when they were not involved whatsoever. Regardless of whether it was true or not, Islamic religion and its Muslim adherents are at the top of societies’ agenda just waiting for the evidence to be generated so that they can then safely blame them for such world affairs. Again, this has led to the attack on the Islamic religion itself wherein people have come to postulate Islam as an act of oppression, violence and hatred towards non-Muslims. Anti-Muslim sentiments and campaigns have resulted from such misinformation the media has been generating and feeding its viewers.
People of different ethnicity, such as Muslims and even Blacks, are the ones being subjective to the racism within the air lines. But why? Simple answer, were playing along with our fears. With the new media giving us over exaggerated perspective on current events, our minds feed into those emotions, which causes us to adapt those perceptions in a negative way, thus giving us our racist stereotype views. New laws and regulations post nine eleven are actually encouraging these behaviors. For people being racially profiled are mainly men of the Muslim region, they feel embarrassed when they have to get a pat down because the TSA agent are giving into their fears. But think about this, the United States has only had two terrorist threats since nine eleven, the underwear bomber and the shoe bomber, neither of whom were Muslim. With recent trends for terrorist groups trying to recruit non- Arab of any gender race and religion for plots, the airlines still continue to harass males of the Muslim region (Schneier). In fact according to a static published in Barbara Mantel article “Far- right extremism”, seventy -three percent of threats being made are from anti-government activates and only thirty six are inspired from Al Qaeda . Banning the no flight list as Chapman descried, may not be the best answer. If anything it would cause more mayhem, think about it, getting rid of a plan, that is intended to recognize terrorist, would be giving those people a free pass. Might as well put out a sign that says, “Terrorist you are now welcome to travel with our husbands, wives, sons and