Racism And Hate Speech In College

993 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Purpose of college education

Hate speech has been a highly debated topic at colleges as of late. Many students, especially minority groups, feel threatened by the words of others. Colleges have started trying to suppress this free speech by implementing speech codes and punishing students for racially charged actions. Colleges claim they have implemented this to protect their students and make their campus a safe space. Others have protested against these rules, declaring these rules unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Although suppressing free speech will make students feel safer, it defeats the purpose of college. Many college students are protesting for administrators to restrict the free speech of others to create a safer learning environment for the students. …show more content…

Students should be allowed to wear whatever they would like, no matter how outrageously racist or culturally insensitive it is. By denying students the ability to express themselves freely, colleges do a disservice to their students and community. Silencing students doesn’t fix the root of the problems. The only way to fix problems of racism and hate speech long term is through dialogue. Robert Zimmer, president of the University of Chicago, insists, “Free speech is at risk at the very institution where it should be assured: the university.” ZImmer goes stating, “The purpose of a university education is to provide the critical pathway by which students can fulfill their potential, change the trajectory of their families, and build healthier and more inclusive societies.” (Zimmer). Basically, Zimmer is saying the reason universities exist are to help students maximize their potential and be successful in life, help their families thrive, and help shape a better society for the future. I believe the only way to help shape better societies for the future is by interacting with people of all sorts of beliefs, and either persuading each other to a certain side, or learning to tolerate other’s views. Colleges are meant to prepare the geniuses of tomorrow, not to protect them from racist of culturally insensitive costumes. In the real world there is not going to be a dean or president saving you from racial injustices. Also, the actions the students took against Nicholas Christakis were unnecessary and proved useless. The students have the right to, and should, protest, but yelling names at somebody and demanding they apologize for no specified reason will lead nowhere. The students should make their argument clear and engage in dialogue with Mr. Christakis, expressing their concerns and try to persuade him in hopes he will see their views in a new light. Once again, the purpose of college is to learn and discuss ideas through

Show More
Related

  • Charles R Lawrence On Racist Speech

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    Charles R. Lawrence intended audience in his article “On Racist Speech” is college students and universities. His sense of tone is forthcoming. Lawerence word choice sets the tone by using the words conspicuous,dissenter, and bigot. The article gives examples of how universities do not protect minority college students. Lawrence states that universities should protect their students He also gives an example of how universities have tried to have rules to ban racist speech yet they have proven ineffective in stopping racial slurs. The regulations have not stopped the verbal brutality yet it has stopped the occurrences of physical fights. He mentions how students do not have any need to be hurt verbally.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Campus Racism 101 By Nikki Giovanni

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1994, renowned college professor Nikki Giovanni published an awe-inspiring article. It contains guidance to black college students on how to academically apply themselves in college, and she teaches them how to deal with the ignorance of white people, from sharp tongued comebacks to gaining a professor’s respect. Along the way, the article “Campus Racism 101” states Giovanni has acquired a tenure, she has a teaching position for life, at the predominately white student body Virginia Tech (Giovanni 11). Nikki Giovanni’s “Campus Racism 101” uses logic when giving advice to black students on how to succeed in college, appeals to Giovanni’s credibility, and appeals to the emotions of racism all in order to educate how black college students need to deal with ignorance on a college campus.

    Read More

  • Trigger Warnings Analysis

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    College is full of new experiences, new people, and new communities, and many universities encourage the exchange of new ideas and diversity among students. This year, the University of Chicago sent out a letter to all of its incoming freshmen informing them that in keeping with their beliefs of freedom of expression and healthy discussion and debate, the school would not provide “safe spaces” or “trigger warnings”. Senior Sophie Downes found this letter to be misleading in many ways, including in the definitions of safe spaces and trigger warnings, as well as the issues it was addressing. Downes claims that the letter was misrepresenting the school, but also was using the letter as a sort

    Read More

  • First Amendment Rights of Public School Students

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is just down right wrong because it’s unwarranted to give the right to do such a thing to schools and not to government. Thesis Schools have more rights than the government to affect and restrict the 1st Amendment and freedom of speech. Annotated Bibliography Hudson, David L., JR. " First Amendment Center. "

    Read More

  • Free Speech Zones

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin once said, “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” Indeed, free speech is a large block upon which this nation was first constructed, and remains a hard staple of America today; and in few places is that freedom more often utilized than on a college campus. However, there are limitations to our constitutional liberties on campus and they, most frequently, manifest themselves in the form of free speech zones, hate speech and poor university policy. Most school codes are designed to protect students, protect educators and to promote a stable, non-disruptive and non-threatening learning environment. However, students’ verbal freedom becomes limited via “free speech zones.” Free Speech Zones are areas allocated for the purpose of free speech on campus. These zones bypass our constitutional right to freedom of speech by dictating where and when something can be said, but not what can be said.

    Read More

  • We Must Put and End to Hate Speech on Campus

    3184 Words  | 7 Pages

    And even though the First Amendment grants us the freedom of speech, including such hate speech, there are limits. The federal and all state governments, including public colleges and universities and private schools that accept federal financial aid, cannot unnecessarily regulate speech, with the following exceptions: “obscenity, figh...

    Read More

  • Campus Hate Speech Should NOT Be Regulated

    318 Words  | 1 Pages

    In recent years, a rise in verbal abuse and violence directed at people of color, lesbians, and gay men, and other historically persecuted groups has plagued the United States. Among the settings of these expressions of intolerance are college and university campuses, where bias incidents have occurred sporadically since the mid-1980's. Outrage, indignation and demands for change are the responses to these incidents - understandably, given the lack of racial and social diversity among students, faculty and administrators on most campuses. Many universities, under pressure to respond to the concerns of those who are the objects of hate, have adopted codes or olicies prhibiting speech that offends any group based on race gender, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. That's the wrong response, well-meaning or not. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects speech no matter how offensive its content.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Speech Codes

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    This occurs even when the regulations arent enforced souly because they fear being punished for what they may say. As shown in Silverglate and Lukianoffs essay, some campuses go to great extents when giving students permission to give free speeches. They claim that “as long as the policy exists, the threat of enfocement remains real and will inevitably influence some peoples speech” (636). This is a valid argument because they then proceed by saying that The First Amendment calls it a clinging effect. Another effect of these regulations would be that colleges are teaching their students that their opinions and beliefs should not be shared when they are even slightly controversial. Wasserman argues that word choice is an “essential component of free-speech protection”(640) because they allow one to express him or herself

    Read More

  • 1984 George Orwell Conflict Analysis

    1268 Words  | 3 Pages

    Earlier this month in April, student protestors rioted at Berkley University because they did not want certain Conservative guest speakers to be able to give speeches at the university due to some of the speakers comments being inappropriate. According to the nonprofit organization committed to defending civil liberties named The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), "One worrisome trend undermining open discourse in the academy is the increased push by some students and faculty to 'disinvite' speakers with whom they disagree from campus appearances" (The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education). While the protesters were practicing their first amendment right to petition, the students were infringing upon the Conservative speakers freedom of speech which is unconstitutional. Just because the protesters may have disagreed with the speakers comments, does not mean that theys hould have prevented them from being able to express them. This is similar to the novel 1984 because the protestors controlled and censored what was able to be said at Berkeley University, just like how in the novel the Thought Police controlled what citizens said just because The Party disagreed with certain perspectives and didn’t want certain information to be

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech

    1364 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States, free speech is protected by the First Amendment in which it states, “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion … or abridging the freedom of speech.” Now, nearly 250 years into the future, the exact thing that the Founding Fathers were afraid of is starting to happen. Today, our freedom of speech is being threatened through different forces, such as the tyranny of the majority, the protection of the minority, and the stability of the society. Now, colleges and universities in the United States today are also trying to institute a code upon its students that would bar them from exercising their right to speak freely in the name of protecting minorities from getting bullied. This brings us into

    Read More

  • Free Speech College Campuses

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    College campuses have always been the sites where students can express their opinions without fear. There have been many debates about the merits of allowing free speech on campus. Some students and faculties support allowing free speech on campus, while others believe that colleges should restrict free speech to make the college’s environment safer for every student. Free speeches are endangered on college campuses because of trigger warning, increasing policing of free speech, and the hypersensitivity of college students.

    Read More

  • Benefits Of Campus Hate Speech Codes

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    Is Campus Hate Speech Code the right way to give equal value to all students? In recent years, many public schools, colleges and universities have started to implement hate speech codes to combat discrimination and harassment on campuses. In Campus Hate Speech Codes, authored by Gerard Uelmen, it is explained clearly that speech code is morally just response to campus intolerance; thus, it does not solve the discriminatory problems on campuses completely and maintain the balance between individual and group rights. Nevertheless, some claims mentioned in the article about the benefits of campus hate speech code are discussed correctly, while several arguments of speech code opponents were not supported sufficiently. In Campus Hate Speech Codes, the author writes about the positive and negative aspects of hate speech code implementation on campuses.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On School Uniform

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    In America, “The World’s Melting Pot”, we are all unique and should be seen as individuals. Wearing a uniform does not allow for students to demonstrate their individuality; they have to dress conforming to the school’s uniform policy. According to Akerlof and Kranton, “...with attempting to establish a sense of community might be the loss of student’s sense of identification with the school, which could in turn yield lowered outcomes in effort and skills”. These policies leave the students questioning themselves and wondering, “Who am I?”. A survey, of 100 random students, conducted at Zapata High School showed that 72% of students reviewed felt that wearing a uniform suppresses their ability to express themselves as individuals. Forcing students to wear a uniform is also going against the first amendment, which clearly prohibits Congress from making laws that violate freedom of speech; it includes freed...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    One instance of free speech controversy was when a fraternity member of the University Of Maryland had an email leaked of which he said very derogatory and racist remarks about women and shaming them on their appearance. When this email was leaked it created a widespread of controversy and anger among the country. The difficult part in this was that by popular opinion many would want to expel the student who wrote that email but lawyers suggest that by doing so would violate the student 's constitutional rights to freedom of expression. The problem with labeling this kind of behavior as hate speech and trying to suppress vulgar language is no matter how vile the language is it is protected under the first amendment of the constitution. Universities have come together in trying to diffuse this kind of behavior by adding codes of conduct that prohibit certain forms of speech from being permitted on campus. These initiatives have been challenged by civil liberty groups who feel that by prohibiting certain forms of speech the universities are restricting students on their first amendment rights and has to be cautious on what they say as one minor joke could be taken the wrong

    Read More

  • Proposal For A Uniform Dress Code

    810 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pickerington School District should require students to have a uniform dress code. The current dress code policy is very minimal and is not adhered to by the students. Faculty overlook the students who don’t abide by the current dress code as it would take away from their teaching time. One of the main concerns that is brought up when the topic of school uniforms is discussed is freedom of expression. Many people worry that not allowing children to wear certain clothing will “stifle their creativity” (p. ) or restrict their First Amendment rights (Nevada, 2008). There are many reasons for having uniforms in public schools. School uniforms have been shown to improve test scores, raise school pride, increase attendance, reduce violence, and teaches students to dress professionally. School uniforms can also avert the wearing of gang colors (Wilson, 1998).

    Read More

More about Racism And Hate Speech In College

Open Document