Racial Segregation And The United States

1095 Words3 Pages

Throughout the 21st century, our perspectives on inequality have drastically changed. African Americans and Whites can attend the same school, walk the same street, even use the same bathroom facilities. Same-sex marriage has even been legalized in the United States. America now has a different outlook on inequality but even though laws have been passed, discrimination still exists against African Americans and also homosexuals.
A major concern of Dr. King Jr. was racial segregation. Racial segregation is the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment. On August 28th of 1955, a fourteen year old African American boy, Emmett Till was brutally murdered for flirting with a white woman. Emmett Till was from Chicago where segregation was a different level than in the South. Emmett had been visiting family in Mississippi at the time of his murder. Emmett had been beaten so bad the only way his family could identify him was by his initialed ring. Less than two weeks after Emmett’s body was buried, his killers, Roy Bryant and J.W. Milam were put on trial in a segregated courthouse in Sumner, Mississippi. On September 23rd, an all-white jury delivered a “not guilty” verdict because they believed the state had been unsuccessful in proving the identity of the body. The Emmett Till trial was a early form of motivation for the civil rights movement. Some may argue the Emmett Till case wasn 't a form of discrimination because Emmett should have known better than to interact with a white woman during a time like that. I disagree, because of Emmett’s race he was mutilated, tortured and murdered. The was no law back then stating Emmett could not interact with a white women. The Jim Crow Laws, separate ...

... middle of paper ...

...w York state law. Thea Spyer left her estate to her spouse, and because their marriage was not recognized by federal law, the government imposed $363,000 in taxes. Had their marriage been recognized, the estate would have qualified for a marital exemption, and no taxes would have been imposed. On November 9, 2010, Windsor filed suit in district court seeking a declaration that the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional. At the time the suit was filed, the government 's position was that DOMA must be defended. On February 23, 2011, the President and the Attorney General announced that they would not defend DOMA. On April 18, 2011, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives filed a petition to intervene in defense of DOMA and motioned to dismiss the case. The district court denied the motion, and later held that DOMA was unconstitutional.

Open Document