Racial Diversity In The Bell Curve

793 Words2 Pages

The Bell Curve argues that intelligent and ignorant individuals are becoming more divided because opportunities are given based on achievement, and that there needs to be governmental intervention “for the sake of general welfare” because this unintelligent group was reproducing at rapid rates. They attributed this difference in intelligence levels to genetics, which also was presumed to determine race. While these authors were not the first to publish works that attempted to justify racial segregation with “science,” such as the use of phrenology, other scholars discredited their claims as utilizing faulty and biased testing. However, culture is more likely to blame, as well as peoples’ enjoyment of prejudicial segregation as a form of exclusion …show more content…

Racial discrimination is also explained as employers may unintentionally favor other whites because they are more connected to this group, which results in stereotype perpetuations of certain groups. This then results in stereotype threat, where the stereotyped group senses they are being judged and generalized, and thus act in accordance to these assumptions, a dangerous, but continuous cycle. Monopoly may also be to blame for discrimination in the workplace because, “it could control wages and discriminate without threat of competition,” while market would slow down temporarily. When applications were sent to employers, those with “white sounding” names were more likely to be called for an interview. Even when house hunting, those of color get less assistance, or are shown houses in less desirable neighborhoods than whites were. Some theorists even think that discrimination of all races may be higher at certain times than others, such as when competition is high, and thus racial explanations or excuses are more …show more content…

These biases are not innate, but are instead developed and shaped by racist culture. This study also reminded me of the book by Claude Steele, entitled Whistling Vivaldi which ultimately describes a black student being targeted as dangerous or a “thug” while walking down the street, except when he whistles Vivaldi. This act alone defies black stereotypes, because it shows that he is instead educated, in which black men are not presumed to be. These implicit acts are also performed in other ways, such as when whites clutch their wallets or purses tighter when around black bodies, or when sales associates are more watchful over their black customers to make sure they do not steal. Also, because the west is an individualistic culture, it tends to want to blame people for their own misfortunes, as part of the meritocracy myth, and thus believe that “cultural practices” affect their “structural conditions,” when it is actually the other way around. The way western society is structured racially, socioeconomically, as well as by gender, determines the outcome of one’s livelihood. An example of this is when blacks are paid less than their white counterparts than they are more likely to experience poverty

Open Document