An Example Of The Smiley Face Questionnaire

889 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Group dynamics in schools essay

The “Smiley Face” Questionnaire Here is an example of a “Smiley Face” Questionnaire. Notice how the questions are constructed in a positive statement, and how the responses are structure so that responses can be categorized and ordered. Now, read and respond to the following survey questions: Think about a group that you have participated in, but that has ended. Please describe the group. A group that I have participated in is a poetry and writing group in high school. This group was formed to help collect students work of poems and short stories for publication into the school Saga. The school Saga than would be sold to students and others to raise money for items the school might need …show more content…

In addition, every school year there would be a new group started, but it did not always have the same members because people would graduate and new members would join. However, some of the same people might be in the group from ninth grade until they graduated from high school, however, the leaders would be different from year to year also. Complete the “Smiley Face” Questionnaire about the group you described in the preceding prompt by placing an “X” in the box that corresponds to your …show more content…

I was very satisfied with the facilitator of the group. Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree X Please share any comments or thoughts: For this question I disagree because the facilitator or group leader was not always qualified to be running the group such as students that no idea what they were doing. However, when teachers or teacher assistants were in charge of the groups then things would run smoothly. You cannot expect a student that knows nothing about running a group to be a leader unless they are going to have help when running the group, otherwise, things end up being unsuccessful and do not get done right. Of course, that was not always the case, however, when the group leader or facilitator is qualified and knows what they are doing it does make a difference because things get done, tasks get completed, and deadlines that are established get met and the goals of the group get accomplished because things run smoother and the issues get resolved and so forth. D. I felt very satisfied about my relationship with the other members of the group? Strongly Agree X Agree Somewhat Agree

Show More
Related

  • Conformity: High School Students and Cliques

    1986 Words  | 4 Pages

    Group formation or formation of cliques is typically seen as the stereotypical jocks, cheerleaders, geeks, or nerds. But what most do not necessarily take into consideration is that members of each group have an existing commonality between them even if most of the members do not know what that common trait is. Being a part of a group can have an impact on an individual. Through group discussion, individuals only strengthen their beliefs due to the fact that they know that they are not alone in those beliefs since they have friends

    Read More

  • aaaa

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ndly, group performance can be hindered by social loathing and groupthink, however these problems can be overcome by openly discussing these issues. Finally, groups pass through different stages of development and it is unlikely that groups will perform well initially.

    Read More

  • Personality Assessment: Personality Assessment

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?

    Read More

  • Self Disclosure Experiment

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    These student were placed into four groups. In each group, they were asked to fill out what their impressions and feelings were of the experimenter and to answer eight questions. The subject had a choice to answer the questions while being interviewed by the experimenter. Each group had the same task, however in group one, the subject was the control who had to answer the questions. In group two, the subject would answer the question and the experimenter would touch the subjects back. The third group had to answer the questions, but the experimenter would reveal information about himself and self-disclose before the subject would answer the questions. On the fourth group, the experimenter would self-disclose and proceed with the same procedures as group three, but for this group, the experimenter would touch the subject in the back. After the experiment, the subjects were asked to fill out their impressions and feelings. The independent variable for experiment two was the touching and the self-disclosure of the experimenter. The dependent variable was the time spent and duration of the subject’s self-disclosure.

    Read More

  • Nursing Leadership Philosophy

    1685 Words  | 4 Pages

    I believe that leadership was put in place to help othes to do their best

    Read More

  • Social Influence Conformity

    757 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, something happens to individuals when they collect in a group, they act differently to the way they would on their own, regardless of whether the group has gathered to solve problems, make decisions or have fun, and regardless of whether the members know each other. (Psychology in perspective, third edition, Tavris and Wade, 2001)

    Read More

  • Level 2 Certificate Of Leadership And Team Skills

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is important to distinguish the difference between teams and groups. The main difference is that teams work altogether toward a common goal whereas groups can work altogether but for their own objective. It is important to highlight that a group does not necessary need a leader to follow but a team does and this leader will set directions to achieve the goal. In teams people are more committed as they share their ideas, they know the purpose of what they are doing and what the others are doing, they understand better individual objectives and team objectives whereas in groups, generally people are just told what they have to do without further explanations. Because in a team people get to know each other, it builds trust and enhances communication but in groups, people do not really know each other, do not trust or communicate effectively with each other. In teams it is frequent to see constructive conflict as people talk more openly and more honestly but in group it is quite rare. Eventually, people in teams are more involv...

    Read More

  • The Importance of Facilitation in Group Decision-making

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    A facilitator is not allowed to advocate for a specific view point during the process. The facilitator could be from within the organisation as well from outside the organisation (Schwarz, 2002), nevertheless the chosen facilitator needs to be accepted by all parties involved in the meeting. Literature also suggests that facilitators are only there to lead the process, where the process refers to the dynamics of group work like communication, making decisions, solving problems and handling conflict and that the facilitators do not contribute to the meeting in terms of substance. The literature also suggests that facilitators need to improve the structure of the setting in which they operate, where structure can be seen as the makeup of the group and group roles and this leads to an improve...

    Read More

  • Maxwell's Levels Of Leadership By George Maxwell

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is unquestionably true; leadership is start from personal discipline and growth. A leader cannot lean his leadership onto other people, he must do what he believes well and benefit for his followers. One of good statements in this book says, “Winning teams have great leaders.” A great leader develops a team of people who increase production. A great leader creates the right environment because he believes in his team. A great leader leads to a winning team. A winning team keeps improving. As a result, this kind of leadership will lead an organization to accomplish

    Read More

  • Group Leaders: Focus on Charismatic Authority

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Groups are an essential component of society as they allow individuals to affiliate themselves with certain people, typically those who are most similar to themselves. Groups also provide social support and a greater sense of belonging for the individual, which is not provided by crowds. Due to the significance of groups, it is important that groups are maintained in organized structures that encourages group harmony and group cohesion. It is essentially the leader’s task to maintain these ideals since the leader has authority over the members of the group.

    Read More

  • Groupthink

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Team Cohesion

    981 Words  | 2 Pages

    Team leader tend to participate more at this stage than in the early stages. Team members can be expected to assume greater responsibility for decision-making and their professional behaviour.

    Read More

  • Groups in a Society

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    Groups are the essence of life in a society for the reason that everyone is born into one, such as to a mother and father. Your family, church congregation, faculty at a university, and sports teams whether professional or not are all examples of groups. In a general sense, " Groups are people who have something in common and who believe that what they have in common is significant." Societies are the largest and most difficult groups that are studied by social scientists. They are people who share a culture and a territory; they also contain smaller groups within itself. " The types of groups within a society are primary groups, secondary groups, reference groups, social networks, in-groups and out-groups."

    Read More

  • Group Reflection: The Roles Of Working In A Group

    839 Words  | 2 Pages

    This turned out to be the positive group experience for me and other group members. The team was sufficiently strong from the very beginning through the development phase to the end without any incident of conflict and disagreement. Every group member is reliable and understands their roles working in a group. They also understand the significance of progressing collectively towards the shared and common goal. In other words, our group reflected the synergy by the association we held with each other as a team and, thus, reflecting an example of being a successful

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Group Dynamics

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Several experiments and researches have been conducted that have focused on how people behave in groups. The findings have revealed that groups affect peoples’ attitudes, behavior and perceptions. Groups are essential for personal life, as well as in work life.

    Read More

More about An Example Of The Smiley Face Questionnaire

Open Document