Question 2

815 Words2 Pages

At first when you think of a criminal, you may think of someone out to harm another human or humans. The category of what kind of criminal, conventional versus non-conventional, may not occur to you. At least, that was my experience when I first started to learn more about these types of criminals. In regards to a psychopath, both have characteristics that fit into that category. However, non-conventional criminals include corporations that are harder to classify because you cannot apply relationships, emotions, or view their history as you could one person such as a conventional criminal. Yet these two categories have many similarities, but of course differences as well to make them unique.
One aspect that both conventional and non-conventional criminals share is their lack of empathy and remorse. It does not matter what kind of crime you commit, there has to be a sense of disregard for those around you in order to commit it. In the Enron case, they did what they could to gain the most money, but they did it in the shortest amount of time. They did not care for the law and continued to do what they could that affected stockholders as a result. They thought of themselves before everyone else and wanted their needs benefited without even taking a second look at who they were troubling (Fersch 126-127). Enron’s lack of empathy and remorse lead them to keep going as far as they could before they had to file bankruptcy.
Conventional criminals also have that lack of remorse in order to commit the crimes they do. Many, if not all, the conventional criminals we studied this semester had this disregard for those around them. One case that really stuck out was that of Velma Barfield. Her case was quite unique because she would have few...

... middle of paper ...

... committed such heart wrenching murder. Some conventional criminals are involved in raping, others like to be involved in arson, either way it is not the organized white-color crime that non-conventional criminals are involved in.
Another difference between the two types of criminals as Stephanie Knox has pointed out in her discussion post from week 6, is a conventional criminal uses more violence than the non-conventional criminal. Not only are they committing a murder, but they are doing so in a sadistic way. Devin Moore was a fan of using guns and pretending he was in a video game murdering people, specifically cops, while driving recklessly. Non-conventional criminal would rather steal your money without you knowing. However, a non-conventional criminal could cause more crime than the conventional criminal because they tend to target a larger group of people.

More about Question 2

Open Document