Punishment and Self-Persuasion in Adam and Eve

1119 Words3 Pages

Using Punishment and Self-Persuasion to Explain Adam and Eve The Book of Genesis tells the story of how God created man and woman. He permitted Adam and Eve to eat from any tree in his garden except the Tree of Knowledge, and they faced death if they did. They were handed out a severe threat; that of death. As we all know, Adam and Eve did eat from the tree of knowledge and were banished from the Garden of Eden. Looking at the situation from a social psychology perspective, I will examine why that was the case, and what God could have theoretically done to be obeyed. In other words, I will discuss why a mild threat might have worked better in this case.

What is forbidden is desired. This age-old adage is the source of Adam and Eve’s demise. So it is only natural to conclude that the only way to redeem the two besides walling up the Tree of Knowledge, is to make the desired fruit somehow less desirable. One possible solution to that conundrum is by threatening them with a milder form of punishment; say if they were threatened with an hour’s worth of manual labor. One might ask what makes it different from severe punishment. In both circumstances, they will experience dissonance. Adam and Eve would be aware that they are resisting the urge to taste that delicious fruit. Under severe threat, when they ask themselves why they still haven’t tried it, they are reminded of the threat of death. In other words, they have sufficient external justification; they’d rather stay alive. This reduces their dissonance.

Dissonance is also experienced under a mild threat, but the difference is crucial. When they ask themselves that same question, they cannot come up with a convincing answer since the threat is so lenient that it does not provide t...

... middle of paper ...

...desirable. However, since this is not what happened in the story, it is still worth examining what did.

As we established, Adam and Eve, after some time, had reduced their dissonance to the point where eating the fruit was not longer an issue; they decided it was time. The snake serves to facilitate or speed up their decision and nothing else. It seduces them into doing it, but they would never have done it if they devalued the fruit. The snake simply coaxes them, assures them that they are making the correct decision.

In conclusion, a less severe threat might have worked better for Adam and Eve than the one they were handed for all the reasons discussed. It could have made all the difference in the world for the two. Although the story is not typical, I have tried to prove that modern social psychology can be applied and used to understand even the oldest of tales.

More about Punishment and Self-Persuasion in Adam and Eve

Open Document