Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
academic diversity in the classroom
research on diversity in education
academic diversity in the classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: academic diversity in the classroom
The issue of whether charter or public schools are more beneficial for students has been an ongoing debate. The question that arise is which type provides a better education. Having gone to a charter high school myself, I got to see and experience first-hand the benefits of going to a charter school as well as realizing the issues charter schools face here in Oklahoma. These problems need to address in order to guarantee that students are getting the best education that they can get. We are facing an epidemic today with our education system and charter schools could be the solution. There may be opponents to the idea of having charter schools, but they have been wildly successful lately and are quickly expanded throughout the states. This …show more content…
In some communities, charter schools have a higher concentration of minority students than traditional public schools. In addition, they also accept students with special needs and learning disabilities. When I attended Harding, I definitely noticed the diversity that was occurring there that I did not notice at the other public schools. This is due to the small population of the school as well as the diversity of the school. Whenever I needed help on anything I knew that I could depend on the teachers and faculty because they were always available and knew every student by name. The diversity meant that there weren’t cliques or groups, but that the whole school was a community of students that could rely on each other for support. I saw the same people that I knew every time I went to school and not new faces every day. The diversity shows that there are no discrimination and very few bullying. Everyone knew each other and this built a stronger relationship between the students and the faculty that does not exist in big public schools. With the small class room sizes, students had an intimate relationships with the teachers and this allowed them to able to open up and ask for help when needed. Charter schools are able to provide students resources that are not easy gotten at bigger public schools to the size of the student population. This is was charter schools emphasize: improving equality of outcomes for disadvantaged students, providing strong education as a solution for poverty, and providing the necessary preparation for all students no matter the background (Raymond, 2014). The diverseness and close relationships of charter schools allow students to build as a person with the help of the school having high expectations and encouraging personal responsibility and dignity. Because of this, many people can see charter schools as being more liberal
In Meira Levinson’s case study, she asks if the reader would approve a legislation that intended to limit charter school expansion based on the attrition rates of that charter school. Both Pedro Noguera and Patricia Jehlen responded to Levinson’s case study. Noguera and Jehlen shared many views about this legislation such as the need for equity in the American education system, the role of charter schools as innovators and laboratories, and the effect charter schools have had on the students and the public schools near them. However, when drawing their final conclusions about charter schools and this legislation, they reach different solutions.
247). Ravitch contends for-profit charter schools should be banned, and if charter schools are allowed, there need to be direct lines of communication with public schools to support better educational opportunities for all. (2013, p. 247). A Gallup Poll conducted between August 9 – 12, 2012, indicated 60% of Americans believe charter schools are superior to public schools. Research shows the rigor of charter schools vary from institution to institution and state to state. In actuality, charter schools as a whole, student outcomes are equal the results of public schools (Jones, 2012,
Although about 2 million American students now attend around 5,600 charter schools, I do not think this as beneficial to American students as charter school proponents claim. Despite all of the “perks” charters schools boast of and attract parents with, these schools do not necessarily perform better than average schools. Charter schools give an unfair advantage to stronger students, leaving students who struggle in weaker schools with fewer resources to help them. Perhaps most importantly, they are not available to all students, even though they are funded by public tax dollars. Although the motivations behind charter schools are admirable, they are not worth it. Our efforts in improving education are better spent investing in the public schools we already have.
Charter schools are gaining more support every year. President Obama said: “These learning laboratories give educators the chance to try new models and methods. That can encourage excellence in the classroom and prepare more of our children for college and careers,” during his Presidential Proclamation of National Charter Schools Week. But this kind of education doesn’t have the same sort of support from everyone. There is negativity that...
Are charter schools the right choice to the educational needs of our children? Charter schools are tuition free public schools created and operated by parents, organizations, and community groups to fill student’s educational needs. Charter schools consider educating their students as the priority, and identify how children’s learning needs are different from each other, so they came up with different ways on educating their students such as learning in small groups, or by participating in hands on learning. Along with their unique programs such as art, math, and science, charter schools are also the stronger academic choice for students. Parents should consider charter schools for their children’s education. “Charter schools are independent public schools allowed to innovate while being held accountable for improving student achievements” (Edie, 2012, p.1). Charter schools are the best choice for a child’s education.
To understand the actual differences of charter and public school quality of education, it is important to emphasize a fact often lost in the debate; namely, charter schools are public schools, which simply operate under different guidelines. This reality is more critical because of how perception clouds it. Charter schools are perceived as private institutions, supporters of them tend to be conservatives who feel the schools represent the value of competition in education, while opponents typically express the need for public school reform as more crucial in promoting educational equality (Rofes, 159). This political and ideological compone...
In a nation dominated by capitalism and free trade, steps are being taken to turn the ability to learn and other education rights into commodities that can be manipulated and controlled by companies. Charter schools are public schools funded by state money, but not unionized; they also can be in the form of a traditional brick and mortar schoolhouse or an online school (Ravitch)(Molnar)(“Preface to 'Are Charter and Magnet Schools Good Alternatives for Students?’”). According to their proponents, charter schools allow parents more sway over their child’s education (Jacoby 77). A charter school proponent Jeff Jacoby states, “Their goal: to build the kind of school that used to be commonplace in America-one providing a rigorous, traditional, fact-based
Charter schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families choose them for their children. They operate with freedom from some of the regulations that are imposed upon school districts. Charter schools are accountable for academic results and upholding the promises made in their charters.
While private invested charter schools may seem to be the right choice for some children,
Under NCLB policy, if a public school in the state standard exams results in consecutive unqualified scores, the school will be closed soon. Although the government gives parents more choices to accept the way of education, the students just can go to school in poor communities where the environment is bad. When there are charter schools, the public schools are going to be closed, the company or person can take it with permission, the foundation all comes from the government. The biggest difference between charter schools and public schools is that the charter schools have it own operating system, foundation and teachers.(Ravitch, Reign of Error, chapter 16, p157-160) There also are some disadvantages in charter schools, first is the quality gap, due to the quality of teaching which almost depends on teachers and principals. The second one is differentiation between races and classes. Some charter schools’ mission is serve minorities, such as African-American and Hispanic, because they want to save the nations’ culture. However, this limit of communication with other communities will result in a big gap objectively. Charter schools only pay attention to the scores and do not share their strategies to collaborate with public school, because they want more students to get high scores so they can enter to famous schools more than public
A peer reviewed article that includes a wealth of information about charter schools including who is involved, who is affected and how. The article starts with the very basics about charter schools and continues throughout the entire process of explaining them to the readers
Since President Clinton signed into law, H. R. 2616, the “Charter School Expansion Act of 1998” charter schools have been providing an alternative for parents of public school students (Lin, Q., 2001, p.2). To date, charter schools enroll over 500,000 students (Fusarelli, 2002, p. 1). Charter schools have been favorable because it is believed that they can provide for a way to enhance student achievement by serving students who have been under-served by the public schools (Fusarelli, 2002). There is a belief that by creating a competitive educational system, public schools will undergo significant reforms in response to the threat (Franklin, 2002). Because parents of charter school students have made the choice for their children to attend a charter school, it is believed that parents will become more “involved” in their child’s education (Hammer, 2003). Charter schools in many states are “exempt from many state mandates” (Fusarelli, 2002, p. 2). As a result of these exemptions, charter schools also have more flexibility for the administrators when hiring teachers and running a school. They are able to provide higher salaries for teachers working in hard to fill teaching positions (Finn, Kanstoroom, 2002).
One of the more recent policy issues that has arisen in Florida is the amount of funding that Charter school should receive from the state. There are those on the Republican side that believe that they should fund Charter schools equally to how they fund public schools. Raplh Arza, who is a Republican legislator and a lobbyist for charter schools believe that it is discriminatory if the state does not fund both tradition public school and charter schools. He said, “lawmakers shouldn’t discriminate against kids because their parents choose an alternative to traditional public schools and it would be unfair to give traditional schools more money, even though they still vastly outnumber charter schools” (Clark, 2016). On the flip side Joanne McCall,
“ Charter schools are held ideologically as a vehicle for resurrecting, at once, public education and the economic dominance of American business” ( Fabricant and Fine, 12). Charter schools were and are placed as innovative institutions responding to the apparent failing traditional school system. The charter school I observed did not seem to be practicing innovative ways of instruction, nor did it seem to be academically different than a public traditional school in Chicago. Although, researching their website, the partnerships this charter school system has are propelling and financially rewarding American businesses. It also provides the “image” of giving parents an additional “different” choice, specific to serving the Latino community.
That will include assessing faculty development, retention and experience, quality of program within the charters, support systems for low performing students, the impacts that charter school authorizers have on the program, mathematical and reading student scores, and overall satisfaction. Some very intriguing evidence suggest that some charter schools push out low performing students due to accountability pressures (Zimmer & Guarino, 2010, p. 462-4630. This goes against the notion that charter schools are meant to provide support services for all of their students. Even more, the specific reason for charter schools is to provide the kinds of support not available in their public local schools. This study will survey students and parents to gauge overall satisfaction, and this kinds of behavior from charter school will yield negative scores on their performance and effectiveness. For example, in Greene et al. (2006) they found that on survey for parents, students and teachers, they were asked how they felt about the academic performance and satisfaction within the school and why they chose to attend a charter school rather than a public school (Green, et al. 2006,p. 6). It is important to survey all stakeholders of charter schools, because we also want to know if there is any correlation between who authorizes the charter and how effective their programs tend to be. As this study continues with the examination we also found that charters authorized by school districts were more consistent than those governed by private and nonprofit organizations (Carlson et al, 2012, p. 265). All of these factors and findings suggest a need for especial consideration of studies. Charters may generally outperform local schools, by they do so by specifically targeting populations, creating their own rules for governance, and creating the