Public Speaking Discourses

As years have passed by, many new and some continued conflicts have become relevant and significant. Those conflicts cause people who are concerned to desire to speak up and stand up for what they believe in. The debate is whether these people should be able to speak up on a public setting and state their case. Whether they should possess the ability to freely protest or not, depends on if their argument will be detrimental or beneficial to the minds of a multitude of the population. This process of deciding the worth of a speech should consist of a group of experts who are concerned with the topic at hand. Now, I insist that experts of the subjects of speeches should decide the fate of these discourses, because they understand better than any other person whether that speech will be harmful or helpful to

First off, if a speech receives derogatory feedback, then the organization or group that allows for the deliverance of this speech will most likely be held accountable and oppressed by those who were provoked by the message. Secondly, there are a great amount of human beings who listen to the first thing they hear or are easily swayed towards a point, and if what they witness from a discourse indoctrinates them, then that could affect their lives forever. This affect could and has proven to be negative as we can observe through protests and uprisings of sorts. Lastly, if these negative ideas are dispersed and become popular, then followers of these concepts could begin to act radically and irrationally, which leads to disarray and pandemonium amongst innocent bystanders. This disorder can be witnessed in today’s world on various accounts. For these reasons we require people who understand specific subjects to a great extent to decide whether that respective subject is worth the risk of being heard by the