Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
scarlet letter novel analysis
essay on the impact of shame
scarlet letter novel analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: scarlet letter novel analysis
What is public shaming? Well, public shaming is known as when a person in a society is singled out and criticized publicly for something they did and are often isolated from society. Public Shame can have massive effects on a person’s life and reputation. This point can be greatly shown in three sources that were examined in class this year. Source A is The Scarlet Letter , a novel written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. In this novel, a woman named Hester Prynne is publicly shamed for committing adultery. Source B is a speech made by Monica Lewinski at a TED Talk entitled, “The Price of Public Shame.” This speech details Monica’s experience of public shame when she had relations with President Clinton. Source C is an article from The New York Times …show more content…
Source C, however, is different because it is about a woman who is slandered online for making a comment. What all three have in common, however, is that they all involve a woman being publicly shamed. These sources show many of the effects of public shame. Hence, public shame can have a tremendous effect on the social life, professional life, and the personal life of the individual being shamed. First off, public shame can have a huge effect on the social life of the individual being shamed. In Source A, The Scarlet Letter , Hester Prynne was publicly shamed for adultery and her social life suffered effects for it. She was pretty much isolated from society and did not interact with many people. In Source B, Monica Lewinsky states that, “...the attention and judgement that I received, not the story, but that I personally received was unprecedented. I was branded as a tramp, tart, slut, whore, bimbo, and, of course, that woman. I was seen by many but actually known by few” (Lewinsky). This quote is about how public shame can affect your …show more content…
For example, in Source C it can be quoted that Ms. Sacco was, “...fired from her job…” (Bilton). The article gives another example of the professional lives of people being damaged by public shame. “Pax Dickinson, a chief technology officer for Business Insider, was forced to resign this year after tweeting comments that people found sexist” (Bilton). The article also then makes a great point that, “ Yet the people who threatened to rape and murder Ms. Sacco, who attacked her family and friends, aren’t held in contempt or fired from their jobs” (Bilton). To include Source A in this, but to contrast from the two other sources, Hester was not really affected in her professional life, unlike with Source A and especially in Source C. By explaining Source B and Source C in detail and providing this evidence of these bullied and publicly shamed individuals losing their jobs and their chances to support themselves, it can be concluded that public shame has a tremendous and terrible effect on the professional life of those shamed. Finally, onto how the personal lives of people who are publicly shamed are affected. To provide a little background, the personal life of someone includes how they feel inside, their
Such cases may force people to keep quiet instead, due to fear. Shame / embarrassment = = = =
...ses a threat of humiliation and maltreating from other individuals that can have a detrimental effect on their lives. A person can go from being a normal school student to a laughing stock on a popular social network or even trend from a emotionally stable individual to a deranged, depressed critter who now hides in the shadows of society hoping never to be revealed. The informative thought of the re-occurrence of public shaming throughout history from Bennett allows the reader to question if this is an issue that is perpetual and something that will never go away. Furthermore, the author conveys the idea that publicizing oneself can be a burden; the darkside of Internet fame. Wrapping up her article, Bennett portrays a warning to the reader stating, “Shame...will always be with you”(115). Harassment from Internet fame can alter a person's life-forever.
On August 17, 1998, exactly one year after making the statement above, President Bill Clinton prepared to deliver a speech concerning a scandal that had gripped the nation for months. It is needless to say that this was an important moment during the Clinton administration. After accusations of sexual harassment, Clinton addressed the nation and admitted to having a relationship with Monica Lewinsky. In this critical speech Clinton set out to admit to wrong-doings, provide a few reasons for his action, and ultimately persuade the audience into moving on and forgetting the scandal. This essay will break down his speech into sections and examine the most and least effective strategies that Clinton employed and how well he executed those strategies. This is an interesting speech given under rare circumstances. Not since Watergate had an American president been under such harsh moral criticism from the public. By looking critically at this speech we are able to gain valuable insight into Clinton's motives.
Bruckner, Sally. "The Scarlet Letter: Critical Evaluation." Masterplots. Ed. Frank N. Magill. Pasadena: Salem, 1996. 5847-5851.
Lewinski states in her heartfelt speech, “Not a day goes by that I’m not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply.” (Lewinski 2:36-248). To begin, Monica Lewinsky is already in enough sorrow from her terrible mistake, but instead has the entire world to comment on what she did. For some people, there are only a select few that will publicly shame the individual, but for Monica Lewinsky, the entire world gets to say whatever they want about her. Since she fell in love with a past President, more people have the opportunity to judge her; Monica even said that she is in just about forty rap songs that mention her mistake. This shaming has left such an everlasting impression that it took such a long time to even face the rest of the world head on. Furthermore, even though both individuals grow to be strong, the emotional impact still scars. For Hester Prynne, she soon develops pride in wearing her sin, but can never get rid of what has been said. The novel states, “She had wandered, without rule or guidance, in a moral wilderness; as vast, as intricate and shadowy, as the untamed forest, amid the gloom of which they were now holding a colloquy that was to decide their
In the piece Shame on You by Paul A. Trout, he discusses the value and disrespect involved in shaming and how this has changed our academia values in our current society. In this work, he both discusses how shame has changed the interactions between professor and students and also the backlash if a teacher goes too far in their shaming.
Many people think that publically humiliating people will reduce the act of crimes. According to Tangney that “shamed individuals are no less likely to repeat their transgression” (Tangney 525). This shows that when a crime happen big or small saying it publically will bring more crimes, because everywhere the person goes people see him as a bad person not as a person who made a mistake. Often, it will lead to the person to actually do a crime worse than the one they have already done because they see themselves as bad people as a result of the societies view on them. Often, they will be unable to accept the fact that they have made a mistake. Because the government usually involve by giving them a punishment that only make them feel worse about themselves. Which will lead them to deny their criminal act. Because the shameful punishment the government give them will make them become “Irrationally angry withers” (Tangney 525). Therefore, is better to give criminals punishments that will make theme behave better than to shame them in front of everyone’s
Burney and Irwin (2000) say that some of the symptoms of eating disorders lead one to believe that shame plays a key role in them. Fodor ...
Public shaming is much more than just a punishment for people, they either learn nothing from it or hate themselves because if it. It should not be considered appropriate under any circumstances. A crime is a crime no matter how big or how small, people should do the time for what they did. They should not be placed in public and made a fool of. They should be placed somewhere where they can learn from their mistakes and get the help they need to better themselves as a human being.
Shame is like a dark shadow that follows us around, making us second guess what we are about to do, and always something we refuse to talk about. As Brown puts it, shame “derives its power from being unspeakable.” If we recognize our shame and speak about it, it’s like shining a flashlight on it; it dies. This is why vulnerability and shame go hand in hand. We must embrace our vulnerability in order to talk about shame, and once we talk about shame and release ourselves from its bonds, we can fully feel vulnerable and use that vulnerability to find courage and dare greatly. In order to reach this level of wholeheartedness, we must “mind the gap,” as Brown says, between where we are and where we want to end up. We must be conscious of our practiced values and the space between those and our aspirational values, what Brown calls the “disengagement divide.” We have to keep our aspirations achievable, or disengagement is inevitable. Minding this gap is quite a daring strategy, and one that requires us to embrace our own vulnerability as well as cultivate shame resilience. Accomplishing our goals is not impossible if we simply cultivate the courage to dare to take action. We can’t let this culture of “never enough” get in our way, and we have to use our vulnerability and shame resilience to take that step over the
A recent study reveals that when someone we categorize as "other" endures pain, pleasure hormones are released, similar to those released while eating a delicious meal. (Anthes 2010). Before we knew any of the science behind why we ostracize, public shaming was a routine form of punishment. In The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne‒set in mid-1600’s Boston‒ adulteress Hester Prynne navigates the outskirts of Puritan society. As punishment for her sin, Hester must wear a scarlet letter ‘A’. Likewise, in Monica Lewinsky’s Ted Talk, she discusses the astounding degree of public humiliation she was subjected to. When Lewinsky’s affair with President Bill Clinton leaked online in 1998, she found it was impossible to escape the bullying inflicted
There are many cognitive and emotional consequences of SO. Among these consequences are increased body shame, increased appearance anxiety, and a decreased ability to reach high states of motivation. Many studies have shown that there is a positive relation between SO, body shame, and eating disorders (Mercurio & Landry, 2008). It can also be argued that depression, sexual dysfunction, and eating disorders are additional consequences. Depression is most often caused due to body shame an...
There are people that believe public shaming is the answer for disciplining and proving a point to their children. The truth is, public shaming is not the answer. Humiliating a person in public for various reasons is unethical. Public shaming can lead to self-esteem issues, suicide, and in regards to punishment parents should do so privately.
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter offers the reader an inside look at public shaming as a punishment. Throughout the book, Hester Prynne’s punishment requires her to wear a scarlet “A” on her bosom because she committed adultery and ultimately got caught. Similar to Hester Prynne and her community, judges today sentence criminals to public shaming as a reprimand for committing crimes. However, public shaming is unfair and should not be used in the United States court system.
It seems that everyday we are confronted with some kind of situation that we feel leaves us with some form of embarrassment, or we play out how embarrassing an imagined moment will be for us in a public setting. Carey B. (2003). It’s not all about you. Los Angeles Times. Article focuses on this trait that most of us exhibit. The article focus on how we believe people perceive us when we do things in which we believe draws attention, and how we believe that all eyes are always on us, the spotlight effect. The degree to which this effect plays a level in shaping our self esteem, and our self schemas is not directly addressed in this article, but it is what is brought to mind while reading it.