Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cause and effects of fear in our society essay
How 9/11 affected the world
Impact of the 9/11 attack
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cause and effects of fear in our society essay
Introduction
The tragedy of 9/11 has heightened the fear of people as well as their concerns over the growing threats like organized crimes and terrorism. It is undeniable that these negative influences accompany the development of the human society. Hence, there is a strong need for us to employ the fruits of technological products to deter these menaces from happening. Western governments have relied substantially on surveillance-oriented security technologies to foster a proactive attitude towards terror and crime (Pavone and Esposti, 2010). However, despite their prospects on the public safety, these advanced types of machinery, in fact, expose civilians to federal monitoring, diminishing their privacy and constraining civil rights. As
…show more content…
Installing surveillance cameras in public places such as shopping malls and libraries would capture the movements of streetwalkers at every moment, leaving little to private spaces. Moreover, it is likely that the personals obtained from monitoring may be manipulated for wicked intentions, primarily political. Hiran (2005) cited the example of the data-aggregation company ChoicePoint revealed that since February 2005, scammers had tricked it into providing them with the private financial records of 163000 people, at least 88 million individual records held by the government or private companies have been exposed to possible theft. “People were getting worried that the government could spy on us anytime and easily control us,” Pavone and Esposti pointed out …show more content…
It has been a long-term unsolved problem that preservation of privacy and personal data is not conveyed within the current legal schemes imposed on the surveillance-oriented practices. Having full access to a vast scale of personals make civilians vulnerable to illegal exploitation. The expansion of databases gives rise to the issue on which a customer could be mistakenly identified as ‘potential suspect,’ leading to its unique treatment and restriction on specific services. Hence, a more organized form of administration and supervision is required to protect the civil rights of
The pros of electronic surveillance are extensive. The ability for agents of the United States Intelligence Community (IC) to intercept and process communications and information from foreign powers, agents of foreign powers, international terrorist organizations, and others who seek to engage in activities with such groups, provides the ...
Richards, Neil M. "The Dangers Of Surveillance." Harvard Law Review 126.7 (2013): 1934-1965. Academic Search Elite. Web. 8 Feb. 2014.
The government is always watching to ensure safety of their country, including everything and everyone in it. Camera surveillance has become an accepted and almost expected addition to modern safety and crime prevention (“Where” para 1). Many people willingly give authorization to companies like Google and Facebook to make billions selling their personal preferences, interests, and data. Canada participates with the United States and other countries in monitoring national and even global communications (“Where” para 2). Many question the usefulness of this kind of surveillance (Hier, Let, and Walby 1).However, surveillance, used non-discriminatorily, is, arguably, the key technology to preventing terrorist plots (Eijkman 1). Government surveillance is a rising global controversy; and, although minimal coverage could possibly result in safer communities, too much surveillance will result in the violation of citizen’s privacy.
Whether the U.S. government should strongly keep monitoring U.S. citizens or not still is a long and fierce dispute. Recently, the debate became more brutal when technology, an indispensable tool for modern live, has been used by the law enforcement and national security officials to spy into American people’s domestic.
Andrew Guthrie Ferguson thinks that people should be able to choose what areas they want to be secure from “physical and sense-enhancing invasion.” Another scholar, Joel Reidenbuerg, believes that current views of privacy do not fit well with the current technology, instead surveillance is dependent on “the nature of the acts being surveilled.” One more scholar, Chris Slobogin, believes that “the justification for a search should be roughly proportional to the intrusiveness of the search” (Hartzog, 2015). Point is, legal issues surrounding government surveillance is a complex topic without a perfect all-encompassing solution; each situation is different and should be treated
Adam Penenberg’s “The Surveillance Society” reminds Americans of the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and the instant effects the that attacks on the World Trade Center had on security in the United States. Penenberg discusses how the airports were shut down and federal officials began to plot a military response. Although those were necessary actions, they were not as long lasting as some of the other safety precautions that were taken. The Patriot Act, which makes it easier for the government to access cell phones and pagers and monitor email and web browsing, was proposed. Politicians agreed that during a war civil liberties are treated differently.
Domestic Surveillance Citizens feeling protected in their own nation is a crucial factor for the development and advancement of that nation. The United States’ government has been able to provide this service for a small tax and for the most part it is money well spent. Due to events leading up to the terrifying attacks on September 11, 2001 and following these attacks, the Unites States’ government has begun enacting certain laws and regulations that ensure the safety of its citizens. From the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 to the most recent National Security Agency scandal, the government has attempted and for the most part succeeded in keeping domestic safety under control. Making sure that the balance between obtaining enough intelligence to protect the safety of the nation and the preservation of basic human rights is not extremely skewed, Congress has set forth requisites in FISA which aim to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and security; but the timeline preceding this act has been anything but honorable for the United States government.
Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place. ”(“5 Myths about Privacy”). The fight for privacy rights is by no means a recent conflict.
One of the many details shown is that mass surveillance has not had an apparent impact on the prevention of terrorism (Greenwald, 2013). Most of the information gathered has not been used to impede a terrorist attack. Surveillance does not protect the rights to life, property and so on from being violated by terrorists. However it gives the citizen...
The world erupted in outrage following revelations by Edward Snowden regarding the extent of surveillance perform by the National Security Agency. Privacy becomes one of the hottest topic of 2013 and was chosen by the world’s most popular online dictionary, Dictionary.com, as the Word of the Year. However, the government is not the only one that conduct data gathering and surveillance. Employers often monitor their employees, and businesses collect data on theirs customer. The morality of these practices is a topic that generates heated debate.
However, just as the efficiency and effectiveness of surveillance technologies has been on the rise, so has the invasiveness of such measures as they creep closer and closer into our private lives, and increasingly prevalent Internet usage has allowed governments to prove
Privacy is not just a fundamental right, it is also important to maintain a truly democratic society where all citizens are able to exist with relative comfort. Therefore, “[Monitoring citizens without their knowledge] is a major threat to democracies all around the world.” (William Binney.) This is a logical opinion because without freedom of expression and privacy, every dictatorship in history has implemented some form of surveillance upon its citizens as a method of control.
Consequently, surveillance practises have primarily been used to monitor the suspect, the criminal, the abnormal or even those seen as a threat to those in power. Marx (2002) argues traditional definitions of surveillance (such as the above) are not appropriate to define ‘new’ surveillance, indicating this is due to the rapid change in which surveillance has undergone, facilitated through technological developments. Accordingly, I will identify how contemporary surveillance techniques differ from previous
Public safety covers a wide variety of people and organizations, but carries one common theme and that is, the public’s safety. This course has broadened my knowledge on the many roles that make the public safety sector go around and the role the public plays in it as well. My thoughts before the course were close minded and to the point. I quickly realized that policing is not as cut and dry as I once portrayed it to be. Society is always changing and adapting, and it is the job of the those in public safety to adapt and change with it. The mindset that I grew up with, in rural Saskatchewan, was the police are good people and you will only need to deal with them if you break the law or see someone break the law. My answers in the module 1 survey reflected my upbringing. My first thought for
A security guard works in any building or area that needs protection from theft, fire, vandalism, and illegal entry. For every security guards job it depends on where they live and work. Every security guard has a different task. Some work in airports. If you work in an airport you might have to search travelers for weapons, explosives, or drugs. They may have also check cargo for illegal items. There are security guards that work museums and art galleries. These security guards have to make sure no one steals, damages, or touches artwork or historical artifacts. They also help people if they have questions and bring people to safety in case if there is a fire or an earthquake. In office buildings and factories, security guards have to make