Labaree discusses how the United State’s education is in a school syndrome, as people in America want schools to teach society’s ideals as well as let people express their individuality. These two demands are polar opposites that cannot be achieved. As the focus goes towards balancing these in hopes of improving society as a whole, the bettering of actual student learning is put on pause. Labaree talks about the beginning of education reform, in the 19th century, being the most successful in developing society; however, as education reform continued throughout time, its effectiveness wore off. He then addresses how the desire for education reform is more about improving society than it is about learning. He finishes his argument by providing possible solutions to fixing this problem, but states that fixing this problem will never happen because no one is willing to give up both demands. Overall, Labaree goes in wonderful detail explaining the problems of education reform. What made me choose this article was that he addressed the desire that people have on school systems in promoting both society normality and individuality. This correlates well with my topic in whether public school systems promote conformist ideals or individuality.
Ideally, the education system in the United States aims to serve as the great equalizer in the constant struggle to counter decades and centuries of historical oppression against those of non-European descent. The ideology of education as a great equalizer purports a pedagogy as a starting point for those oppressed and separated by such forces as race and class to have access to a quality education, and hence an equal chance at all the US has to offer. It attempts to bring children from disparate realms in a place that serves them all equitably. This ideal constantly challenges the broader values of equality, liberty and democracy considered to be at the core of American ideology. In interpreting this conception, two questions are indirectly answered by examining our educational practices: Does equality in education simply foresee that all students are treated the same, despite their different needs? Or, does it intend to challenge and rectify past inequalities for a truly equitable educational system?
Education in the United States is necessary for a good quality of life and the ability to have a good job to support yourself and your family. Through the history of the United States, however, equality and even equity in education has been a bit difficult for everyone to achieve. For example, the case of Brown vs. Board of Education, people were fighting for schools to be integrated because the white and affluent children got to go to the more prestigious schools and got the better education and therefore had a better way of life. On the other hand, African American children weren’t given such good advantages in education and way of life. Parallel to then, today, schools are integrated but some schools aren’t given as much attention as some
What’s the effect of compulsory education in China
Children are important because they are the future of a country. So, education for children is necessary and compulsory education can make sure most of children can be educated. In the past, Chinese didn’t have enough money to execute compulsory education. After doing much effort, compulsory education was executed in 1986. The compulsory education system causes many effect and issues.
After much consideration I’d venture to say that three things that we do really well in the U.S. Education System are as follows: our responses to differences in the classroom, the fact that we have a free and accessible public education for all individuals regardless of religion, race, or economic status, and our ability to pursue a higher education. While I trust that as educators we could all benefit from a more extensive training in particular areas-- I do believe it is commendable how well we respond to the varying aspects of our classrooms including: inclusion, multicultural education, multiple intelligences, and differentiated instruction (Sapon-Shevin, 2013).
In Jonathan Kozol’s article, Still Separate, Still Unequal, he states that segregation is still present in today’s schools. Not in the sense that the government requires black and white children to be in separate facilities, but in the fact that black children come from different socioeconomic backgrounds than white children causing them to live in separate areas, go to separate schools, and get a eduction that differs in quality. While visiting a few inner city minority schools, Kozol came across a classroom where the mission statement which states values and priorities of the school is “to develop productive citizens” (Kozol 466). There was a signal that the teacher would give to the classroom, and the students would repeat the signal back to the teacher. The teacher turned and looked at Kozol and said “I can do this with my dog.” (Kozol 466). Kozol and Anyon have the same opinion on what curriculum quality is like in differ...
While social class may have some effect on how one may view schooling and formal education, it would not be fair to say that growing up or being in a lower class living situation depreciates the value that one has for school. In many instances, it is assumed that because a person comes from a lower-class background that not only are their values for school lower, than those of higher class, but their education levels and ability to handle and process situations are placed on a lower level as well. While these are indeed horrific stereotypes and generalizations, the idea is perpetuated throughout, primarily, Western culture. It is just simply illogical to believe that one 's education will be taken for granted due to their socio-economic class
Tyack, David B. Seeking Common Ground: Public Schools in a Diverse Society. President and fellows of Harvard College, 2003.
Tracking in school allows for students below the line of average to be pushed from one grade to the next without meeting the standards. This has been happening in school all over the nation since integration has begun. Oakes wrote her article for the reader to understand the background of tracking but as well to understand the harm it can do for the student. The student, in the end, is getting an inadequate education because they are never challenged. The schools know that “ability differences among students were a legitimate basis for educational and social sorting” (Oakes, 2009, p. 5). These schools are the ones that are less likely to support Detracking because tracking allows for their system to operate.With the system the school has put into place minority students have learned that need to “act white” (Oakes, 2009, p. 6) in order to be perceived as intelligent otherwise they are written off. These minority students have to fit into a mold to reach a high level of education which eventually widens the achievement gap. In Oakes article, teacher state that within four days without an assignment they can tell who will succeed and who will be passed along. Less than a week into school teachers already know the fate of their students and many don 't do anything to help change their
Politics and business influence have been a long term problem for the establishment of a free and fair education opportunity. America has been called ?the melting pot? of the world, meaning that within the nation live such an abundance of individuals from different aspects of life. Within the world, we find some societies less fortunate than other societies. Economic diversity is present within the United States as well. It is commonly understood that the wealthy are becoming better educated than the poor, and similarly that the wealthy have a better chance to survive in the economic growth of today?s society.