Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Milgram's study of obedience summary
Milgram's study of obedience summary
Negative features of obedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Milgram's study of obedience summary
Psychological Processes that May Be Involved in Obedience to Authority
Obedience is the following of someone else's instructions or orders to
do something. The instructions are usually from someone who has
authority such as a parent or teacher. Milgram proposed the agentic
state theory; this is where we act as an agent of someone who has
authority, it means that we find it easy to deny personal
responsibility for our actions because we have just been following
orders or doing our job. In 1950 Adorno expressed his beliefs that
personality was a better explanation of obedience. Adorno believed
that some people have an 'Authoritarian Personality', this means that
they are likely to be obedient yet prejudiced. Adorno believed that
your childhood experiences play a key role in the growth of an
authoritarian personality. Individuals with this type of personality
often have certain characteristics such as; rigid beliefs in
conventional values, general opposition to other groups,
discrimination to uncertainty or vagueness and obedient attitudes to
authority figures.
b) Outline the findings of one study of minority influence and give
one criticism of this study.
Moscovici undertook a study of minority influence in 1969. He wanted
to find out whether a minority could influence a majority of naïve
participants, reversing the usual direction of social influence.
Moscovici found that 32% of the majority conformed at least once,
showing a yielding to minority influence. However Moscovici focused on
the difference between the majority and the minority. In everyday
life, the difference is more complicated, as minorities typically have
l...
... middle of paper ...
...ce for
some. She also criticised Milgram for the great distress caused to
most if not all of his participants during and after the study.
Baumrind also expressed that Milgram's participants were not aware
that the study could cause conflict and distress, and therefore were
not in a position to give their cognisant consent. She also commented
on the fact that participants who asked to withdraw were told that
they had no choice but to go on. As shown by my examples a large
number of the studies carried out for social psychology have good and
bad points, they all show what they were aiming to for example
Zimbado's prison experiment showed conformity to social roles and
Milligram's experiment showed obedience. However it is rare that there
is an experiment without negative criticism about the way that it was
conducted.
Upon analyzing his experiment, Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, concludes that people will drive to great lengths to obey orders given by a higher authority. The experiment, which included ordinary people delivering “shocks” to an unknown subject, has raised many questions in the psychological world. Diana Baumrind, a psychologist at the University of California and one of Milgram’s colleagues, attacks Milgram’s ethics after he completes his experiment in her review. She deems Milgram as being unethical towards the subjects he uses for testing and claims that his experiment is irrelevant to obedience. In contrast, Ian Parker, a writer for New Yorker and Human Sciences, asserts Milgram’s experiments hold validity in the psychological world. While Baumrind focuses on Milgram’s ethics, Parker concentrates more on the reactions, both immediate and long-term, to his experiments.
In the present case there are two possible prosecutions to discuss. Jerome may be guilty of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’ under section 76 of the Serious Crime Act 2015. While Talia may be guilty of assault under section 20 or section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act (OAPA) 1861.
In a series of experiments conducted from 1960 to 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram, sought to examine the relationship between obedience and authority in order to understand how Nazi doctors were able to carry out experiments on prisoners during WWII. While there are several theories about Milgram’s results, philosopher Ruwen Ogien uses the experiment as grounds for criticizing virtue ethics as a moral theory. In chapter 9 of Human Kindness and The Smell of Warm Croissant, Ogien claims that “what determines behavior is not character but other factors tied to situation” (Ogien 120). The purpose of this essay is not to interpret the results of the Milgram experiments. Instead this essay serves to argue why I am not persuaded by Ogien’s
The first thing I found to be extremely fascinating was the Milgram Study. This study in particular explains in dept how an average person will obey to an authority figure even though the orders could be terrible. I think it’s a fascinating study because typically individuals will not complete an order if it makes them feel uncomfortable. However, once you place someone with higher power they forget about the discomfort and instantly obey to the orders given to them. This topic is important in psychology because it shows the relationship of obedience. It goes to show the factors that have to be put in place for a person to obey to someone else’s orders. This helps psychologist understand how a person with higher power can ultimately control the decisions of a person with lower power.
The book Obedience to authority by Stanley Milgram is about a series of experiments performed by Milgram himself, on unsuspecting participants. The experiments were performed to answer the question if people had a tendency to comply with authority figures. Milgram drew inspiration from Adolf Eichmann’s trial, to create a study to explain the actions of the Nazis. As quoted “The point of the experiment is to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim.” (pg. 5) The experiment involved a learner, whom was strapped to a chair and connected with electrodes, an experimenter who lead and gave instructions about the experiment and a teacher whom asked
Loweistein, K. (1953). The Role Of Ideologies in Political Change. New York: International Social Science Bulletin.
When pondering about what an individual thinks of you, people have varying views. Some people are not concerned; to others it is the most critical matter on their mind. The feeling of being judged is a very potent emotion. Likewise, conformity is one of the largest controversies in today’s society; the behavior of someone in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. So if someone personally made his or her expectations on what you should be like evident, would you change? In Matthew Quick’s The Silver Linings Playbook, he illustrates that judgment and expectations conform a person into someone they are not due to their personal identity. This can be seen through a character’s loyalty to another, dominance and the vulnerability it includes, and a character’s love and devotion. Conformity and the reasons for its appearance will be analyzed through samples from Matthew Quick’s bestselling novel.
Hitler and Mussolini were both individuals that used social influences throughout history . Each of these evil villains used authority and social pressure to persuade and manipulate people into performing acts that they wouldn’t normally do . Hitler and Mussolini legitimized their authority through immoral actions and fear and abused their authority. This is important because authority and social pressures are one of the most dangerous combinations there are. The use of these two socially accepted tools have resulted in the deaths of more people, and lead to atrocities such as more genocides than any other social force. . In the 1950s a psychologist Solomon Asch at Rutgers University decided to test group and individuals against in peer pressure. Later on 1963 Ache’s student a Yale psychologist named Stanley Milgram studied social obedience. Each particular study which was 13 years apart would reveal the same answers and types of results. Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram recognized these events and decided to do their own experiments in social influences and authority. Each one of their studies is equally important, because they reinforce each other in characteristics and results.
In a seminal work, Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford (1950) coined the term authoritarian personality and stated that it was characterised by strong adherence to externally imposed conventional norms, as well as submission or obedience to the authorities that promote those norms. According to Adorno and colleagues, these behaviours are attempts to deal with various personal insecurities. Specifically, authoritar- ian individuals displace their own anxieties onto weak minority groups in their culture (e.g., ethnic and/or religious minorities) or onto people who deviate from social norms (e.g., homosexuals). Displacement is often accompanied by associated beliefs that are highly evaluative and rigid. Other characteristics of the authoritarian personality include a cynical view of mankind, cognitive and emotional inflexibility. A belief in the need for power and toughness, the tendency to act harshly towards nonconformists, opposition to subjective or imaginative tendencies, and an exaggerated concern with promiscuity. Adler (1965) re-examined the personality char- acteristics described by Adorno and colleagues and noted that the central trait of the authoritarian personality is the ‘‘will to power over others’’, which results in aggressive overcompensation for feelings of inferiority and insignificance. Contemporary research continues to rely on many of the conceptualisations and measures originated by Adorno and colleagues (Martin, 2001; Stone, Lederer, & Christie, 1993).
Intolerance of Authority Versus Individual Freedom and Integrity. “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller is a play, about the Salem Witch. Trials. The.
Introduction Individuals often yield to conformity when they are forced to discard their individual freedom in order to benefit the larger group. Despite the fact that it is important to obey the authority, obeying the authority can sometimes be hazardous, especially when morals and autonomous thought are suppressed to an extent that the other person is harmed. Obedience usually involves doing what a rule or a person tells you to, but negative consequences can result from displaying obedience to authority; for example, the people who obeyed the orders of Adolph Hitler ended up killing innocent people during the Holocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience, reflecting how this can be destructive in real life experiences. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid, hence useless.
Authority cannot exist without obedience. Society is built on this small, but important concept. Without authority and its required obedience, there would only be anarchy and chaos. But how much is too much, or too little? There is a fine line between following blindly and irrational refusal to obey those in a meaningful position of authority. Obedience to authority is a real and powerful force that should be understood and respected in order to handle each situation in the best possible manner.
Through several of the concepts found within social psychology, there are explanations as to why I reacted and handled the situation of leaving Western Kentucky University the way that I did. However, for the purpose of this paper I will focus on the concepts of compliancy, affective forecasting, focalism, and immune neglect in order to explain my social situation.
Does anyone under the age of 25 show any respect to police officers? It’s a question that has been coming up in political debates everywhere as of late. Most people have been saying that the police are to blame for the problems. However, in this article, William Grigg shows how the true problem lies in the lack of respect for authority. As a result, everyone has turned against the police and only the image the public wants see has been shown on the news.
last resort by these men in the end it was the only sensible thing to