Psychoanatic Criticism In Shakespeare's The Tempest

757 Words2 Pages

During the course of the play The Tempest, the psychoanalytical criticism can be applied while reading these scenes. As Freud argues that all humans have a dark side to them, we tend to hide this side of us as we get older. This can be shown by the character, Caliban with his uncontrolled side, which is reflected as the dark side in a human. Caliban is seen to be the superego in the play, which is evident when he does not wish to receive Prospero’s physical punishments. Despite the punishments he receives, his desires fail to remain within him. Caliban is also missing his mother in this play, which leads him to feel inadequate. Prospero is one of the only obstacles between him and Miranda. Prospero’s desire for power and control over the characters in the play, shows Freud’s theory coming into play, if one craves power, it is possible because one has lacked in its childhood. …show more content…

One of the symbols often shown or spoken throughout the play is water. The image of water is shown to be deadly. This is shown by Ferdinand losing his father at sea and he deems to think that his father drowned as they were involved in a shipwreck. Water is a huge symbol and image in the play, as the setting takes place on an Island near the Bermuda Triangle and portrays the image if anything is lost in the water, it is lost or gone forever. The song by Ariel, leads Ferdinand to think that his father drowned at sea and is gone forever. Ariel’s song puts in our minds that his body will not be found as a body, but as something else. The symbol of water gives us the impression that once something is lost at sea, it’s never coming back. This is shown in the movie Titanic when Rose drops the heart of the sea necklace into the ocean, never to be seen

Open Document