Pseudoscience Essay

Pseudoscience, containing the Greek prefix of “pseudo,” which means fake, can be simply defined as “fake science.” A more concise definition of pseudoscience is, “a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method” (Oxford Dictionary). The claims made in pseudoscience are not supported by evidence found in scientific experiments, and according to Rory Coker, a professor at the University of Texas, pseudoscience shows a complete disregard to actual scientific results yielded from experiments (para 7). Pseudoscience, instead, makes use of witness testimonials, photographs, and ambiguous works of ancient religion or mythology as evidence for the claims made (para 7.) Unlike science, which provides an objective

Unlike pseudoscience, which are baseless claims, the theories in junk science are based on legitimate scientific evidence. However, these theories have yet to be proven, and this inability to prove it may be due to the lack of knowledge or advance technology necessary. The unproven nature of these theories should not undermine the validity of the theories themselves. Junk science is vastly different from pseudoscience, one is based on scientific facts and evidence whereas the other is based on individuals’ beliefs,

One attempt at disproving polygenic inheritance may involve the findings made by Gregor Mendel in his pea plants experiment. Critics may argue that since Mendel had discovered the law of independent assortment, stating that one allele is inherited from each parent, and this is the source of trait inheritance from parent to offspring, there cannot be multiple alleles impacting one trait. However, Mendel only studied specific, simple traits of the pea plants, and his results cannot be applied to complex human traits such as skin